Volume 14 • Issue 1 • PP: 18–22 • 2026
Demand and Acceptance in Euro-Area Retail Payments: A Country-Level Decision Analysis of the 2024 SPACE Survey
Open Access & Copyright
© 2026 The Author(s). Published by ASPG. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Abstract
Retail payment providers must decide whether to invest in consumer activation, merchant acceptance, or both. This study compares those signals using published country tables from the European Central Bank’s 2024 Study on the Payment Attitudes of Consumers in the Euro Area. Across 20 countries, the share of point-of-sale transactions paid without cash correlates with the share of respondents preferring noncash methods (r = 0.65) and with the share of transactions where noncash payment was available (r = 0.70). Leave-one-country-out prediction error falls from 11.67 percentage points for a country-mean benchmark to 9.54 with preference alone, 8.91 with acceptance alone, and 8.89 with both. Adding account ownership yields 8.58, a modest further gain. Latvia, Portugal, and Slovakia combine above-median noncash preference with above-median reports of cashless payment refusal. Germany illustrates the limits of a simple market screen: its observed noncash use exceeds the model’s held-out estimate by 26.03 points. The results support using demand and acceptance as complementary market diagnostics, followed by local transaction research before investment. The analysis describes associations among national aggregates and does not identify a causal effect of merchant acceptance.
Keywords
References
[1] European Central Bank, “Study on the payment attitudes of consumers in the euro area (SPACE) – 2024,” Report and chart data, 2024.
[2] J. Meyer and F. Teppa, “Consumers’ payment preferences and banking digitalisation in the euro area,” European Central Bank, Working Paper Series 2915, 2024.
[3] T. Q. Long, P. J. Morgan, and N. Yoshino, “Financial literacy, behavioral traits, and ePayment adoption and usage in japan,” Financial Innovation, vol. 9, p. 101, 2023.
[4] J. Arifovic, J. Duffy, and J. H. Jiang, “Adoption of a new payment method: Experimental evidence,” European Economic Review, vol. 154, p. 104410, 2023.
[5] M.-C. Broekhoff and C. van der Cruijsen, “Paying in a blink of an eye: It hurts less, but you spend more,”Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 221, pp. 110–133, 2024.
[6] L. Schomburgk, A. Belli, and A. O. I. Hoffmann, “Less cash, more splash? a meta-analysis on the cashless effect,” Journal of Retailing, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 382–403, 2024.
Cite This Article
Choose your preferred format
Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions, and data presented in this article are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of ASPG, the journal, or its editors. ASPG and the editors disclaim responsibility for any harm arising from the use of any ideas, methods, instructions, or products described in this article, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.