Volume 12 • Issue 1 • PP: 01–09 • 2025
Optimizing Business Process through Fault-Tolerant Scheduling in Cloud Environments: A Comparative Study
Open Access & Copyright
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by ASPG. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
View PDF Abstract
The fault tolerance study carried out in this research explores Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) to improve cloud computing dependability and functionality. Being an integral part of the rage for business operations, cloud-computing fundamentals of resource provisioning and fault tolerance have a bearing on the overall cost-dynamics, ROI and OpEx. Reliability covers such issues as hardware failures, configuration problems and other network issues that may have financial implications and even lead to revenue loss, and failure to meet service level agreement (SLA). The work develops a novel GAN-BiLSTM model for the accurate prediction of faults and the enhancement of recovery management, resulting in resource efficiency and cost of capital reduction (CapEx). Evaluation criteria involve deadline guarantee ratio, average task delay, and system scalability, confirming that the proposed model has better financial performance than DPSO and ANFIS. Cutting wastage of resources and increasing energy capacity in a system, the model displays attractive cost reduction and operating effectiveness for cloud service providers. In the simulation, important results of the model are demonstrated in the business continuity, financial risk reduction as well as maintaining accurate and resourceful service in high demand situations. All these developments have placed the fault tolerant systems powered by machine learning as indispensable instruments that can also enhance profitability, resources utilisation and sustainable competitiveness in the cloud computing business.
Keywords
References
[1] X. Zhou, G. Zhang, J. Sun, J. Zhou, T. Wei, and S. Hu, “Minimizing cost and makespan for workflow scheduling in cloud using fuzzy dominance sort-based HEFT,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 93, pp. 278– 289, 2019.
[2] M. Zhao, Z. Han, and X. Du, “A survey of data center network topology structure,” in Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), 2023, pp. 303–309.
[3] C. Acevedo, P. Hernandez, A. Espinosa, and V. Mendez, “A data-aware multiworkflow scheduler for clusters on WorkflowSim,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Complexity, Future Information Systems and Risk, 2017, pp. 79–86.
[4] V. Roy and S. Shukla, “Designing efficient blind source separation methods for EEG motion artifact removal based on statistical evaluation,” Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 108, pp. 1311–1327, 2019.
[5] A. Sariga and J. Uthayakumar, “Type 2 fuzzy logic based unequal clustering algorithm for multi-hop wireless sensor networks,” International Journal of Wireless and Ad Hoc Communication, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 33–46, 2020.
[6] I. V. Pustokhina, “Blockchain technology in the international supply chains,” International Journal of Wireless and Ad Hoc Communication, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 16–25, 2020.
[7] I. Casas, J. Taheri, R. Ranjan, L. Wang, and A. Y. Zomaya, “A balanced scheduler with data reuse and replication for scientific workflows in cloud computing systems,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 74, pp. 168–178, 2017.
[8] U. K. Jena, P. K. Das, and M. R. Kabat, “Hybridization of meta-heuristic algorithm for load balancing in cloud computing environment,” Journal of King Saud University—Computer and Information Sciences, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 2332–2342, 2022.
[9] S. Sekigawa, C. Sasaki, and A. Tagami, “Toward a cloud-native telecom infrastructure: Analysis and evaluations of Kubernetes networking,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Globecom Workshops, 2022, pp. 838–843.
[10] K. Kiruthika, S. Gayathri, R. Hemalatha, and P. Menaga, “Design and development of mobile healthcare application for “ayurvedic” based clinical documents,” Journal of Cognitive Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 18–27, 2021.
[11] A. G., A. Kumar, and V. R., “Query-based image retrieval using support vector machine (SVM),” Journal of Cognitive Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 28–36, 2021.
[12] M. Ghasemzadeh, H. Arabnejad, and J. G. Barbosa, “Deadline-budget constrained scheduling algorithm for scientific workflows in a cloud environment,” in Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, vol. 70, no. 19, 2017, pp. 19.1–19.16.
[13] V. Roy and S. Shukla, “Effective EEG motion artifacts elimination based on comparative interpolation analysis,” Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 97, pp. 6441–6451, 2017.
[14] H. Elhoseny and H. El-Bakry, “Utilizing service oriented architecture (SOA) in IoT smart applications,” Journal of Cybersecurity and Information Management, vol. 0, no. 1, pp. 15–31, 2019.
[15] A. Maseleno, “Design of optimal machine learning based cybersecurity intrusion detection systems,” Journal of Cybersecurity and Information Management, vol. 0, no. 1, pp. 32–43, 2019.
[16] Z. Ahmad, B. Nazir, and A. Umer, “A fault-tolerant workflow management system with quality-of-serviceaware scheduling for scientific workflows in cloud computing,” International Journal of Communication Systems, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2021.
[17] P. Banerjee, S. Roy, A. Sinha, M. M. Hassan, S. Burje, A. Agrawal, A. K. Bairagi, S. Alshathri, and W. El-Shafai, “MTD-DHJS: Makespan-optimized task scheduling algorithm for cloud computing with dynamic computational time prediction,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 105 578–105 618, 2023.
[18] S. Basu, M. Karuppiah, K. Selvakumar, K.-C. Li, S. K. H. Islam, M. M. Hassan, and M. Z. A. Bhuiyan, “An intelligent/cognitive model of task scheduling for IoT applications in cloud computing environment,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 88, pp. 254– 261, 2018.
[19] N. Singh, Y. Hamid, S. Juneja, G. Srivastava, G. Dhiman, T. R. Gadekallu, and M. A. Shah, “Load balancing and service discovery using Docker Swarm for microservice-based big data applications,” Journal of Cloud Computing, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2023.
[20] V. Roy et al., “Network physical address based encryption technique using digital logic,” International Journalof Scientific and Technology Research, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 3119–3122, 2020.
[21] K. Vinay, S. M. D. Kumar, S. Raghavendra, and K. R. Venugopal, “Cost and fault-tolerant aware resource management for scientific workflows using hybrid instances on clouds,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 77, no. 8, pp. 10 171–10 193, 2018.
[22] H. Arabnejad, C. Pahl, G. Estrada, A. Samir, and F. Fowley, “A fuzzy load balancer for adaptive fault tolerance management in cloud platforms,” in Proceedings of the European Conference on Service-Oriented and Cloud Computing, 2017, pp. 109–124.
[23] S. Shukla, V. Roy, and A. Prakash, “Wavelet based empirical approach to mitigate the effect of motion artifacts from EEG signal,” in 2020 IEEE 9th International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies (CSNT), 2020, pp. 323–326.
[24] J. Shah and D. Dubaria, “Building modern clouds: Using Docker, Kubernetes and Google Cloud Platform,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 9th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference, 2019, pp. 184–189.
[25] B. Cai, B. Wang, M. Yang, and Q. Guo, “AutoMan: Resource-efficient provisioning with tail latency guarantees for microservices,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 143, pp. 61–75, 2023.
[26] L. Osman, O. Taiwo, A. Elashry, and A. E. Ezugwu, “Intelligent edge computing for IoT: Enhancing security and privacy,” Journal of Intelligent Systems and Internet of Things, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 55–65, 2023.
[27] O. H. Embarak and R. A. Zitar, “Securing wireless sensor networks against DoS attacks in industrial 4.0,” Journal of Intelligent Systems and Internet of Things, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 66–74, 2023.
Cite This Article
Choose your preferred format
Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions, and data presented in this article are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of ASPG, the journal, or its editors. ASPG and the editors disclaim responsibility for any harm arising from the use of any ideas, methods, instructions, or products described in this article, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.