Volume 12 • Issue 1 • PP: 15–22 • 2025
Gorilla Troop Optimizer-Driven Fault-Tolerant Scheduling for Cloud-Based Business Workflows
Open Access & Copyright
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by ASPG. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
View PDF Abstract
The study proposes a GTO-FTASS (Gorilla Troop Optimizer-Based Fault Tolerant Aware Scheduling Scheme) for improving the reliability and performance in the cloud computing context. Cloud systems are more likely to fail due to the architecture of these layers and dependence on both the hardware and software, therefore require more sophisticated fault-tolerant solutions. The preliminary to this work is the design of an adaptive GTO-FTASS with a fitness function based on two constraints: Expected Time of Completion (ETC) and Failure probability that were derived from the gorilla value system. The approach provides resource utilization and task planning with the provision of fault recovery hence reducing exposure to time loss and operational vulnerability. MGS outperforms several state-of-the-art models, such as MTCT, MAXMIN, ACO, NSGA-II, and DCLCA in terms of makes pan, failure ratio and failure slowdown. Finally, the applicability of experimental validation with various situations and fluctuating intensities demonstrates the scalability of the model and its stability under pressure, decreased failure rates and increased effectiveness of performed tasks. Through the approaches to latency, resource, and error correction, GTO-FTASS is an investment that stewards have to make to cut costs and achieve high performance on clouds. The framework also provides competitive benefit and robustness for cloud enterprising in fluctuating and crucial strategic applications.
Keywords
References
[1] I. E. Lagaris, A. Likas, and D. I. Fotiadis, “Artificial neural networks for solving ordinary and partial differential equations,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 987–1000, Sep. 1998.
[2] J. Kennedy and R. C. Eberhart, “Particle swarm optimization,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 4, Perth, Australia, 1995, pp. 1942–1948.
[3] R. Storn and K. Price, “Differential evolution—a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces,” Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 341–359, Dec. 1997.
[4] M. Clerc and J. Kennedy, “The particle swarm— explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 58–73, Feb. 2002.
[5] S. Mirjalili, S. M. Mirjalili, and A. Lewis, “Grey wolf optimizer,” Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 69, pp. 46–61, Mar. 2014.
[6] J. Derrac, S. García, D. Molina, and F. Herrera, “A practical tutorial on the use of nonparametric statistical tests as a methodology for comparing evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms,” Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–18, Mar. 2011.
[7] M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 378, pp. 686–707, Feb. 2019.
[8] Z. Sabir, M. A. Z. Raja, M. Umar, and M. Shoaib, “Neuro-swarm intelligent computing to solve the secondorder singular functional differential model,” The European Physical Journal Plus, vol. 135, no. 6, p. 474, Jun. 2020.
[9] Z. Sabir, C. M. Khalique, M. A. Z. Raja, and D. Baleanu, “Evolutionary computing for nonlinear singular boundary value problems using neural network, genetic algorithm and active-set algorithm,” The European Physical Journal Plus, vol. 136, no. 2, p. 195, Feb. 2021.
[10] Z. Sabir, “Neuron analysis through the swarming procedures for the singular two-point boundary value problems arising in the theory of thermal explosion,” The European Physical Journal Plus, vol. 137, no. 5, p. 638, May 2022.
[11] Z. Sabir, S. B. Said, Q. Al-Mdallal et al., “A neuro swarm procedure to solve the novel second order perturbeddelay lane–emden model arising in astrophysics,” Scientific Reports, vol. 12, p. 22607, Dec. 2022.
[12] A. P. Piotrowski, J. J. Napiorkowski, and A. E. Piotrowska, “Particle swarm optimization or differential evolution—a comparison,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 121, p. 106008, May 2023.
[13] S. u. I. Ahmad, F. Faisal, M. Shoaib, and M. A. Z. Raja, “A new heuristic computational solver for nonlinear singular thomas–fermi system using evolutionary optimized cubic splines,” The European Physical Journal Plus, vol. 135, no. 1, p. 55, Jan. 2020.
[14] S. Cuomo, V. Schiano Di Cola, F. Giampaolo, G. Rozza, M. Raissi, and F. Piccialli, “Scientific machine learning through physics-informed neural networks: Where we are and what’s next,” Journal of Scientific Computing, vol. 92, p. 88, 2022.
[15] W. Gao, Y. Luo, J. Xu, and S. Zhu, “Evolutionary algorithm with multiobjective optimization technique for solving nonlinear equation systems,” Information Sciences, vol. 541, pp. 345–361, 2020.
[16] M. Kaveh and M. S. Mesgari, “Application of metaheuristic algorithms for training neural networks and deep learning architectures: A comprehensive review,” Neural Processing Letters, vol. 55, pp. 4519–4622, 2023.
[17] W. Gao, G. Li, Q. Zhang, Y. Luo, and Z.Wang, “Solving nonlinear equation systems by a two-phase evolutionary algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, andCybernetics: Systems, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 5652–5663, 2021.
[18] V. Venkatachalapathy and S. M. Mallikarjunaiah, “A deep learning neural network framework for solving singular nonlinear ordinary differential equations,” International Journal of Applied and Computational Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 68, Jun. 2023.
[19] J. Derrac, S. García, D. Molina, and F. Herrera, “A practical tutorial on the use of nonparametric statistical tests as a methodology for comparing evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms,” Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–18, Mar. 2011.
[20] M. F. Ahmad, N. A. Mat Isa, W. H. Lim, and K. M. Ang, “Differential evolution: A recent review based on state-of-the-art works,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 3831–3872, 2022.
[21] Z. Sabir, D. Baleanu, M. R. Ali, and R. Sadat, “Neuron analysis of the two-point singular boundary value problems arising in the thermal explosion’s theory,” Neural Processing Letters, vol. 54, pp. 5297–5324, 2022.
[22] K. Meidani, A. Hemmasian, S. Mirjalili, and A. Barati Farimani, “Adaptive grey wolf optimizer,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 7711–7731, 2022.
[23] J. Carrasco, S. García, M. M. Rueda, S. Das, and F. Herrera, “Recent trends in the use of statistical tests for comparing swarm and evolutionary computing algorithms: Practical guidelines and a critical review,” Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, vol. 54, p. 100665, 2020.
Cite This Article
Choose your preferred format
Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions, and data presented in this article are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of ASPG, the journal, or its editors. ASPG and the editors disclaim responsibility for any harm arising from the use of any ideas, methods, instructions, or products described in this article, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.