Volume 6 • Issue 1 • PP: 01–06 • 2026
Spectrally Matched Fractional Sobolev Tikhonov Regularization for Periodic Deconvolution
Open Access & Copyright
© 2026 The Author(s). Published by ASPG. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Abstract
Let T = R/Z and Aβ = (I−Δ)−β/2 with β > 0. From data gδ = Aβ f †+η, ∥η∥2 ≤ δ, consider the fractional Sobolev Tikhonov family f δ λ,s = argminf∈Hs(T) Aβ f −gδ 2 2 +λ ∥ f ∥2 Hs, s ≥ 0. Writing μk = (1+4π2k2)1/2 and ρ = s+β, the estimator is diagonal in the Fourier basis, bf δ λ,s(k) = μβ k 1+λ μ2ρ k bgδ (k). If f † ∈ Hr(T) and 0 < r ≤ 2ρ, then f δ λ,s− f † 2 ≤Caδλ−a+CbMrλb, a = β 2ρ , b = r 2ρ , Mr = f † Hr . where Cq = qq(1−q)1−q for 0 < q < 1 and C1 = 1. Direct minimization gives λ∗ ≍ δ2ρ (r+β) and f δ λ∗,s− f † 2 = O δr/(r+β). Thus the pre-saturation exponent is independent of the penalty order s. When r > 2ρ, the bias saturates and the rate becomes O(δ2ρ/(2ρ+β)); hence the least order avoiding saturation is smin = max{0, r/2−β}. The balanced half-power frequency satisfies μc ≍ δ−1/(r+β), whereas its logarithmic roll-off is −ρ/2. The same exponents persist for spectrally equivalent convolution operators c−μ−β k ≤ ak ≤ c+μ−β k . Fourier experiments on N = 2048 modes, using three source regularities, four penalty orders, five noise levels, and 30 perturbations per configuration, reproduce the predicted saturation ordering and transition boundary. For the H6 benchmark at δ = 10−3, the mean L2 error decreases from 1.4013×10−2 for s = 0 to 1.2710×10−3 for s = 2; the latter is the first tested order in the non-saturated regime.
Keywords
References
[1] A. Rastogi, “Tikhonov regularization with oversmoothing penalty for nonlinear statistical inverse problems,” Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 4111–4126, 2020.
[2] A. Rastogi, G. Blanchard, and P. Mathé, “Convergence analysis of tikhonov regularization for non-linear statistical inverse problems,” Electronic Journal of Statistics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 2798–2841, 2020.
[3] B. Hofmann and R. Plato, “Convergence results and loworder rates for nonlinear tikhonov regularization with oversmoothing penalty term,” Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis, vol. 53, pp. 313–328, 2020.
[4] D.-H. Chen, B. Hofmann, and I. Yousept, “Oversmoothing tikhonov regularization in banach spaces,” Inverse Problems, vol. 37, no. 8, p. 085007, 2021.
[5] P. Miller and T. Hohage, “Convergence rates for oversmoothing banach space regularization,” Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis, vol. 57, pp. 101– 126, 2022.
[6] T. Hohage and F. Werner, “Error estimates for variational regularization of inverse problems with general noise models for data and operator,” Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis, vol. 57, pp. 127–152, 2022.
[7] F. Parzer and O. Scherzer, “On convergence rates of adaptive ensemble kalman inversion for linear ill-posed problems,” Numerische Mathematik, vol. 152, pp. 371– 409, 2022.
[8] A. Rastogi and P. Mathé, “Inverse learning in hilbert scales,” Machine Learning, vol. 112, pp. 2469–2499, 2023.
[9] S. Cipolla, M. Donatelli, and F. Durastante, “Regularization of inverse problems by an approximate matrixfunction technique,” Numerical Algorithms, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 1275–1308, 2021.
[10] K. Bredies and S. Fanzon, “An optimal transport approach for solving dynamic inverse problems in spaces of measures,” ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 2351–2382, 2020.
[11] K. Bredies, M. Carioni, S. Fanzon, and F. Romero, “A generalized conditional gradient method for dynamic inverse problems with optimal transport regularization,” Foundations of Computational Mathematics, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 833–898, 2023.
[12] J. Jiang, J. Chung, and E. de Sturler, “Hybrid projection methods with recycling for inverse problems,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. S146–S172, 2021.
[13] A. Habring and M. Holler, “A generative variational model for inverse problems in imaging,” SIAM Journal on Mathematics of Data Science, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 306– 335, 2022.
[14] R. Cohen, M. Elad, and P. Milanfar, “Regularization by denoising via fixed-point projection (RED-PRO),” SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1374–1406, 2021.
[15] S. Gazzola and M. Sabaté Landman, “Regularization by inexact krylov methods with applications to blind deblurring,” SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1528–1552, 2021.
[16] N. M. Dien, D. N. D. Hai, T. Q. Viet, and D. D. Trong, “On tikhonov’s method and optimal error bound for inverse source problem for a time-fractional diffusion equation,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 61–81, 2020.
[17] S. Lu, P. Niu, and F. Werner, “On the asymptotical regularization for linear inverse problems in presence of white noise,” SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 2021.
[18] P. Miller and T. Hohage, “Maximal spaces for approximation rates in ℓ1-regularization,” Numerische Mathematik, vol. 149, no. 2, pp. 341–374, 2021.
[19] N. K. Chada, A. M. Stuart, and X. T. Tong, “Tikhonov regularization within ensemble kalman inversion,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 1263–1294, 2020.
[20] N. K. Chada, M. A. Iglesias, S. Lu, and F. Werner, “On a dynamic variant of the iteratively regularized gauss– newton method with sequential data,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. A3020–A3046, 2023.
[21] Y. Xia, W. Wang, and B. Han, “A fast averaged kaczmarz iteration with convex penalty for inverse problems in hilbert spaces,” SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1079–1103, 2022.
Cite This Article
Choose your preferred format
Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions, and data presented in this article are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of ASPG, the journal, or its editors. ASPG and the editors disclaim responsibility for any harm arising from the use of any ideas, methods, instructions, or products described in this article, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.