Volume 9 • Issue 2 • PP: 08-15 • 2023
Priority Direction of Modernization of The Industrial Structure Of The Economy During The Transition to A Complex Economy
Open Access & Copyright
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by ASPG. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Abstract
According to the results of the econometric analysis, a 1% increase in the output of high-tech and science-intensive industries leads to a 0.137655% increase in the GDP, and a 1% increase in the output of high-tech and science-intensive industries is 0.024673% of the GDP. , a 1% increase in high-tech production leads to a 0.030797% increase in GDP. In the future, the growth rate of the gross domestic product in Uzbekistan will have a trend of higher growth. Until 2030, the annual growth rate will be 5.1 percent, which will lead to an increase in the volume of production of the gross domestic product (1.051 10 = 1.64) by about 1.65 times.
Keywords
References
[1] Dosi G. Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories // Research Policy. - 1982. - No. 11. -P. 147-162.
[2] Glazev S. Yu. Economy budushchego. Is it a chance for Rossii? -M.: Knijnyy mir, 2016. -S. 124.
[3] Mensch G. Stalemate in Technology – Innovations Overcame the Depression. -New York: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1979. -274 p.
[4] Kun T. Structure nauchnyx revolution. -M.: Ekonomika, 1977. -S. 120.
[5] Vasilevsky E. Structural speed, dynamics and efficiency of the road economic SShA do 2020 г. // ME i MO. 2006. No. 9. S. 74.,
[6] Inozemtsev V.L. Sovremennoe postindustrialnoe obshchestvo: priroda, protivorechiya, perspective: ucheb. posobie dlya studentov vuzov. M.: Logos, 2000. S. 59.,
[7] Klimovich M. A. Seti kak struktura razvitiya convergentnyx tekhnologiiy // Fundamentalnye issledovaniya. - 2017. - No. 9. - S. 159.,
[8] Krasilnikov O. Yu. Structural and economic traffic. - Saratov: Izd-vo SGU, 2001. - S. 24.,
[9] Kondratev N.D. Problemy economic dynamic. - M. : Economics, 1989. - 526 p.,
[10] Butorina O.V. Innovative economic development in the region: analysis method in the framework of the recurrent approach // Vestnik PGU. Series: Economics. 2016. No. 3 (30). S. 105 -119.,
[11] Kravets A.V. Innovative economy of Russia: problems and perspectives of economic development // Kreativnaya ekonomika// No. 1, 2016. – S. 47-52.,
[12] Kotsyubinsky V. A. Methodological approaches sopostavleniya pokazateley razvitiya vysokotekhnologichnyx sektorov Rossii i stran OESR // Innovatsii. - 2015. - No. 4(198). - S. 21 26.,
[13] Tatarkin A.I., Romanova O.A. Promyshlennaya politika i mechanism ee realizatsii: systemic approach // Ekonomika regiona. - 2007. - No. 3. - S. 19-31.,
[14] Sukharev O. S. Strukturnaya politika v ekonomie Rossii: usloviya formirovania // Priority Rossii. -2014. - No. 3 (240). - S. 2-8.
[15] C. Freeman and L. Soete, The Economics of Industrial Innovation, 3rd ed. London, U.K.: Routledge, 1997.
[16] Perez K. Technological revolution and financial capital. - M.: Delo, 2011. - 405 p.,
[17] Margaret Sharp. The challenge of long-term structural change // Futures. - 1980-10. -T. 12, vyp. 5. -S. 370–385.
[18] Ppaid V., Medvedev D. Phenomenon NBIC -convepgentsii. Pealnost i ozhidaniya // Filosofskie nauki. -2008. - No. 1. -S. 105.
Cite This Article
Choose your preferred format
Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions, and data presented in this article are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of ASPG, the journal, or its editors. ASPG and the editors disclaim responsibility for any harm arising from the use of any ideas, methods, instructions, or products described in this article, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.