Volume 13 • Issue 2 • PP: 01–05 • 2026
Turiyam Set Comparison with Aristotle and Belnap Four-Valued Logic
Open Access & Copyright
© 2026 The Author(s). Published by ASPG. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
View PDF Abstract
In recent times, investigating data with Turiyam attributes and its analysis has been considered one of the crucial tasks. It provides a way to characterize fuzziness in attributes in four independent ways: the true region (t), false region ( f ), indeterminate region (i), and liberal region (l). Numerous algorithms have been suggested for applications of the Turiyam set as a graph, a Turiyam matrix and algebraic properties of a Turiyam matrix. It tries to use words to calculate whenever there’s a human consciousness. One suitable example is the voting system in a democratic country like India where people vote according to their conduit metaphor or they select NOTA. There are, however, several older four valued methods, such as those of Nagarjuna (Catuskoti) and Aristotle’s logic and Belnap’s logic. The author gives an example to compare the Turiyam logic with each of these approaches in this paper.
Keywords
References
[1] P. K. Singh, “Data with Turiyam set for fourthdimension quantum information processing,” Journal of Neutrosophic and Fuzzy Systems, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 9–23, 2021.
[2] P. K. Singh, N. Surathu, and G. S. Prakash, “Turiyambased four-way unknown profile characterization on social networks,” Journal of Galoitica: Journal of Mathematical Structures and Applications, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 27–43, 2024.
[3] S., “Four-dimensional space,” Nature, vol. 31, p. 481, [4] T. Parsons and G. Ciola, “The traditional square of opposition,” 1997.
[5] S. Boffa and P. Murinova, “Aristotle’s square for mining fuzzy concepts,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 508, p. 109323, 2025.
[6] N. D. Belnap, “A useful four-valued logic,” in Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logic: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic, J. M. Dunn and G. Epstein, Eds. D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1975, pp. 8–37.
[7] G. I. Gurdjieff, In Search of Being: The Fourth Way to Consciousness. Shambhala Publications, 2021.
[8] P. D. Ouspensky, A New Model of the Universe. New York: Vintage Books, 1971, p. 378.
[9] P. C. Mahalanobis, “The Indian-Jaina dialectic of Syadvad in relation to probability (i),” Dialectica, vol. 8, pp. 95–111, 1954.
[10] G. B. Burch, “Seven-valued logic in Jain philosophy,” International Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 68–93, 1964.
[11] A. Schumann, “Nagarjunian-Yogacarian modal logic versus Aristotelian modal logic,” Journal of Indian Philosophy, vol. 49, pp. 467–498, 2021.
[12] N. Martin, R. Priya, P. K. Singh, and R. Gandhi, “Turiyam cognitive maps in optimal industrial decision making,” Big Data and Computing Visions, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 276–286, 2025.
Cite This Article
Choose your preferred format
Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions, and data presented in this article are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of ASPG, the journal, or its editors. ASPG and the editors disclaim responsibility for any harm arising from the use of any ideas, methods, instructions, or products described in this article, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.