Volume 26 • Issue 4 • PP: 57-64 • 2025
Holling Type-III Functional Response Action of Predator-Prey System with Harvested Predator Stability and Their Neutrosophic Generalized Versions
Open Access & Copyright
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by ASPG. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Abstract
This paper focuses on the stability of Descriptor Predator-Prey economic system and its related neutrosophic system of Holling type-III functional action response with harvested predator under classical real environment and neutrosophic environment. Where the solvability and dimensionless forms have been presented along with the necessary mathematical justifications and proofs with some qualitative properties have been proposed and developed with systematic illustration.
Keywords
References
[1] M. K. M. A. and R. A. Z., “Bifurcation and chaotic analysis and design of some differential-algebraic systems,” University of AL-Mustansiriy, 2019.
[2] R. K. Naji, “Order and choose in multi-species ecological systems,” Indian Institute of Technology Rookie, 2003.
[3] A. J. Lotka, Elements of Mathematical Biology, Dover Publications, 1956.
[4] A. Y. J. Almasoodi, M. K. Mohsin, S. A. AL-Ameedee, and M. A. Shanyoor, “A new SDIMSIM methods with optimized region of stability and sustainable development with applications on neutrosophic data,” Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, vol. 82, no. 1, p. 32, 2025.
[5] H. S. Gordon, “The economic theory of a common-property resource: The fishery,” in Fisheries Economics, vol. I, Routledge, 2019, pp. 3–21.
[6] A. N. Sadiq, “The dynamics and optimal control of a prey-predator system,” Global Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 5287–5298, 2017.
[7] T. K. Kar and U. K. Pahari, “Modelling and analysis of a prey–predator system with stage-structure and harvesting,” Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 601–609, 2007.
[8] Y. Feng, Q. Zhang, and C. Liu, “Dynamical behavior in a harvested differential-algebraic allelopathic phytoplankton model,” International Journal of Information & Systems Sciences, vol. 5, no. 3–4, pp. 558–571, 2009.
[9] S. L. Campbell, “Singular systems of differential equations,” 1980.
[10] L. Perko, Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, vol. 7, Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
[11] T. Kar and K. Chakraborty, “Bioeconomic modelling of a prey predator system using differential algebraic equations,” International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 13–34, 2010.
[12] A. Y. J. Almasoodi, A. Abdi, and G. Hojjati, “A GLMs-based difference-quadrature scheme for Volterra integro-differential equations,” Applied Numerical Mathematics, vol. 163, pp. 292–302, 2021.
[13] M.-C. Anisiu, “Lotka, Volterra and their model,” Didáctica Mathematica, vol. 32, no. 01, 2014.
[14] S. J. and R. A. Z., “Robust and optimal control of nonlinear descriptor dynamic systems,” University of AL-Mustansiriy, 2015.
[15] J. Sjöberg, “Some results on optimal control for nonlinear descriptor systems,” Institutionen för systemteknik, 2006.
[16] A. Ashine and D. Melese, “Mathematical modeling of a predator-prey model with modified Leslie-Gower and Holling-type II schemes,” 2017.
[17] A. Buscarino, L. Fortuna, and M. Frasca, Essentials of Nonlinear Circuit Dynamics with MATLAB® and Laboratory Experiments, CRC Press, 2017.
[18] R. A. Z. and M. K. M. Almamoori, “Solvability and transcritical bifurcation of three-dimensional harvesting differential-algebraic prey-predator model with Lotka-Volterra functional response,” Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 214–226, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://jardcs.org/abstract.php?id=1343
[19] V. W. B. Kandasamy and F. Smarandache, “Some neutrosophic algebraic structures and neutrosophic n-algebraic structures,” Hexis, Phoenix, Arizona, 2006.
[20] M. Abobala and A. Hatip, “An algebraic approach to neutrosophic Euclidean geometry,” Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 2021.
[21] F. Smarandache, A Unifying Field in Logics: Neutrosophy: Neutrosophic Probability, Set and Logic, Rehoboth: American Research Press, 1999.
Cite This Article
Choose your preferred format
Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions, and data presented in this article are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of ASPG, the journal, or its editors. ASPG and the editors disclaim responsibility for any harm arising from the use of any ideas, methods, instructions, or products described in this article, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.