Volume 26 • Issue 1 • PP: 293-310 • 2025
A Comprehensive Approach to Solid Waste Management Site Selection Using Simplified Neutrosophic Distance-Based Similarity Measures with N-Valued T-Spherical Fuzzy Neutrosophic Sets
View PDF Abstract
In a neutrosophic environment, a single-valued neutrosophic multi-set, and an intuitionistic fuzzy-valued neutrosophic multi-set are defined by sequences of acceptance, indeterminacy, and rejection grades. The structure of these sets enables the incorporation of multiple layers of information across acceptance, indeterminacy, and rejection grades, making them particularly valuable for multi-criteria decision-making processes. This paper presents the N-valued T-spherical fuzzy neutrosophic set as an advanced extension of neutrosophic sets, aimed at improving uncertainty management and imprecision in complex, real-world scenarios. Building upon previous models such as neutrosophic sets, intuitionistic fuzzy-valued neutrosophic sets, Pythagorean fuzzy neutrosophic sets, and T-spherical fuzzy neutrosophic sets, this new approach introduces greater flexibility in handling indeterminacy. The authors define N-valued T-spherical fuzzy neutrosophic sets and numbers, incorporating new mathematical operations and comparison functions. A significant contribution of the work is the development of simplified neutrosophic-valued distance-based similarity measures for N-valued T-spherical fuzzy neutrosophic sets, along with a score function to rank simplified neutrosophic values. To illustrate the practical utility of this framework, an algorithm is applied to a real-world problem of site selection for solid waste management systems, effectively addressing decision-making scenarios with disjoint criteria. The results and discussions show that the N-valued T-spherical fuzzy neutrosophic set outperforms existing methods by providing more accurate and precise results, specifically in multi-criteria decision-making contexts. The site choice example for solid waste management highlights how this new approach enhances accuracy.
Keywords
References
[1] L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Inform. Contr., vol. 8, pp. 338-353, 1965.
[2] R. R. Yager, “Pythagorean fuzzy subsets,” in Joint IFSA World Congress NAFIPS Annual Meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS), 2013, pp. 57–61. https://doi.org/10.1109/IFSA-NAFIPS.2013.6608375.
[3] K. Atanassov, “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Set. Syst., vol. 20, pp. 87-96, 1986.
[4] F. Smarandache, “Neutrosophic set - a generalization of the intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., vol. 24, pp. 287-297, 2005.
[5] J. Ye, “A multicriteria decision-making method using aggregation operators for simplified neutrosophic sets,” J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 2459-2466, 2014.
[6] B. C. Cuong, “Picture fuzzy sets,” J. Comput. Sci. Cybern., vol. 30, pp. 409-420, 2014.
[7] T. Mahmood, K. Ullah, Q. Khan, and N. Jan, “An approach toward decision-making and medical diagnosis problems using the concept of spherical fuzzy sets,” Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 31, pp. 7041–7053, 2019.
[8] A. Al-Quran, “A new multi-attribute decision-making method based on the T-spherical hesitant fuzzy sets,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 156200–156210, 2021.
[9] Z. Ali, T. Mahmood, and M. S. Yang, “TOPSIS method based on complex spherical fuzzy sets with Bonferroni mean operators,” Mathematics, vol. 8, p. 1739, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8101739.
[10] S. Ashraf, S. Abdullah, T. Mahmood, and F. Ghani, “Spherical fuzzy sets and their applications in multi-attribute decision-making problems,” J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 36, pp. 2829–2844, 2019.
[11] M. Riaz, M. R. Hashmi, D. Pamucar, and Y. Chu, “Spherical linear Diophantine fuzzy sets with modeling uncertainties in MCDM,” Comput. Model Eng. Sci., vol. 126, pp. 1125–1164, 2021.
[12] P. Liu, D. Wang, H. Zhang, L. Yan, Y. Li, and L. Rong, “Multi-attribute decision-making method based on normal T-spherical fuzzy aggregation operator,” J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 9543-9565, 2021.
[13] H. M. A. Farid, M. Riaz, and G. S. Garcia, “T-spherical fuzzy information aggregation with multi-criteria decision-making,” AIMS Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 10113–10145, 2023.
[14] M. Palanikumar, K. Arulmozhi, and S. Acharjee, “MADM approach for Fermatean neutrosophic normal aggregation operator,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.03700, 2022.
[15] M. Bhowmik and M. Pal, “Intuitionistic neutrosophic set,” J. Inf. Comput. Sci., vol. 4, pp. 142-152, 2009.
[16] M. Unver, E. Turkarslan, N. Celik, M. Olgun, and J. Ye, “Intuitionistic fuzzy-valued neutrosophic multi-sets and numerical applications to classification,” Complex Intell. Syst., vol. 8, pp. 1703-1721, 2022.
[17] M. C. Bozyigit, M. Olgun, F. Smarandache, and M. Unver, “A new type of neutrosophic set in Pythagorean fuzzy environment and applications to multi-criteria decision making,” Infinite Study, 2023.
[18] J. Rajan and M. Krishnaswamy, “Similarity measures of Pythagorean neutrosophic sets with dependent neutrosophic components between T and F,” J. New Theory, vol. 33, pp. 85–94, 2020.
[19] D. Karabasevic, “Multiple-criteria decision-making using neutrosophic sets: A comparative study,” Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol. 400, pp. 123–145, 2022.
[20] S. Broumi and F. Smarandache, “Several similarity measures of neutrosophic sets,” Neutrosophic Sets Syst., vol. 1, no. 10, pp. 54–62, 2013.
[21] W. H. Cui and J. Ye, “Generalized distance-based entropy and dimension root entropy for simplified neutrosophic sets,” Entropy, vol. 20, no. 11, p. 844, 2018.
[22] J. Ye, “A multicriteria decision-making method using aggregation operators for simplified neutrosophic sets,” J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 2459–2466, 2014.
[23] J. Ye, “Vector similarity measures of simplified neutrosophic sets and their application in multicriteria decision making,” Int. J. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 204–211, 2014.
[24] J. Ye, “Improved cosine similarity measures of simplified neutrosophic sets for medical diagnoses,” Artif. Intell. Med., vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 171–179, 2015.
[25] J. Ye, “Single-valued neutrosophic similarity measures based on cotangent function and their application in the fault diagnosis of steam turbine,” Soft Comput., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 817–825, 2017.
[26] J. Ye and Q. S. Zhang, “Single-valued neutrosophic similarity measures for multiple attribute decision making,” Neutrosophic Sets Syst., vol. 2, pp. 48–54, Jan. 2014.
[27] J. Ye and J. Fu, “Multi-period medical diagnosis method using a single-valued neutrosophic similarity measure based on tangent function,” Comput. Methods Programs Biomed, vol. 123, pp. 142–149, Jan. 2016.
[28] P. Majumdar and S. K. Samanta, “On similarity and entropy of neutrosophic sets,” J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1245–1252, 2014.
[29] C. Liu, “New similarity measures of simplified neutrosophic sets and their applications,” J. Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 790–800, 2018.
[30] P. Biswas, S. Pramanik, and B. C. Giri, “Some distance measures of single-valued neutrosophic hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications to multiple attribute decision making,” New Trends Neutrosophic Theory Appl., pp. 27-34, 2016.
[31] R. Şahin and P. Liu, “Distance and similarity measures for multiple attribute decision making with single-valued neutrosophic hesitant fuzzy information,” New Trends Neutrosophic Theory Appl., pp. 35-54, 2016.
[32] I. Deli, “Operators on single-valued trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers and SVTN-group decision-making,” Neutrosophic Sets Syst., vol. 22, pp. 131-150, 2018.
[33] M. N. Jafar, M. Saeed, K. M. Khan, F. S. Alamri, and H. A. E. Khalifa, “Distance and similarity measures using max-min operators of neutrosophic hypersoft sets with application in site selection for solid waste management systems,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 11220-11235, 2022.
[34] H. Wang, F. Smarandache, Y. Q. Zhang, and R. Sunderraman, “Single-valued neutrosophic sets,” Multispace Multistructure, vol. 4, pp. 410-413.
Cite This Article
Choose your preferred format