ASPG Menu
search

American Scientific Publishing Group

verified Journal

Financial Technology and Innovation

ISSN
Online: 2836-5372
Frequency

Continuous publication

Publication Model

Open access journal. All articles are freely available online with no APC.

Financial Technology and Innovation
Review Article

Volume 6Issue 2PP: 17–25 • 2026

FinTech Infrastructure and Cryptocurrency Markets in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review with Evidence from Indonesia and Malaysia

Mustafa Musa 1* ,
Raden Aur Aachman Azakiyullah 2
1Center of Research and Innovation Management, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia
2Department of Information System, Universitas Alma Ata, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
* Corresponding Author.
verified

Open Access & Copyright

© 2026 The Author(s). Published by ASPG. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Received: January 22, 2026 Revised: March 10, 2026 Accepted: May 18, 2026

Abstract

Indonesia and Malaysia are a perfect example of the global FinTech order: two of the world’s biggest Muslim-majority economies with growing and fast expanding digital financial infrastructure, with different regulatory architectures and at different stages of maturity of the cryptocurrency market. In this paper, a systematic review of 40 peer-reviewed studies on technology infrastructure for financial markets in general, the dynamics and adoption of cryptocurrencies, design of central bank digital currencies, Islamic FinTech, and comparative regulatory frameworks in both countries is presented. The review includes five thematic streams: digital payment infrastructure, connectedness of the cryptocurrency market, CBDC development, CBDC Shariah compliance, and financial inclusion enabled by FinTech. The Key findings indicate that Indonesia, under the guidance of the Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) since 2023, has more than 30 licensed exchanges and an estimated 15 million retail investors, while Malaysia’s Securities Commission (SC) prioritises investor protection over market breadth, issuing five exchanges with higher levels of integration in Islamic finance. There are three structural challenges in both jurisdictions: the lack of ASEAN-level regulatory coordination, the digital infrastructure gap that remains in rural populations and the lack of a harmonized screening mechanism for assets based on Shariah. The review pinpoints 7 high-priority research gaps and outlines a research agenda for the future, organized in 5 methodological pillars.

Keywords

FinTech Cryptocurrency Indonesia Malaysia Blockchain CBDC Islamic finance Digital payment Southeast Asia Systematic review

References

[1] P. Gomber, R. J. Kauffman, C. Parker, and B. W. Weber, “On the FinTech revolution: interpreting the forces of innovation, disruption, and transformation in financial services,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 220–265, 2018.

[2] D. A. d. N. Sant’Anna and P. N. Figueiredo, “FinTech innovation: is it beneficial or detrimental to financial inclusion and financial stability? A systematic literature review and research directions,” Emerging Markets Review, vol. 60, p. 101140, 2024.

[3] B. M. Zams, R. Indrastuti, A. G. Pangersa, N. A. Hasniawati, F. A. Zahra, and I. A. Fauziah, “Designing central bank digital currency for Indonesia: the Delphi–analytic network process,” Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 411–438, 2020.

[4] I. Trinugroho, P. Pamungkas, J. Wiwoho, S. M. Damayanti, and T. Pramono, “Adoption of digital technologies for micro and small business in Indonesia,” Finance Research Letters, vol. 45, p. 102156, 2022.

[5] Y. Affandi, M. M. Ridhwan, I. Trinugroho, and D. Hermawan, “Digital adoption, business performance, and financial literacy in ultra-micro, micro, and small enterprises in Indonesia,” Research in International Business and Finance, vol. 70, p. 102376, 2024.

[6] N. Mohd Haridan, A. F. Sheikh Hassan, S. Mohammed Shah, and H. Mustafa, “Financial innovation in Islamic banks: evidence on the interaction between Shariah board and FinTech,” Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 911–930, 2023.

[7] M. Arief Jailani and A. Muneeza, “Crypto assets: the need for Shariah screening criteria for digital assets in Malaysia,” International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Research, no. 1, pp. 27–47, 2023.

[8] N. Kshetri and E. Loukoianova, “Data privacy considerations for central bank digital currencies in Asia-Pacific countries,” Computer, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 95–100, 2022.

[9] B. Setiawan, T. D. Phan, J. Medina, M. Wieriks, R. J. Nathan, and M. Fekete-Farkas, “Quest for financial inclusion via digital financial services (FinTech) during COVID-19 pandemic: case study of women in Indonesia,” Journal of Financial Services Marketing, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 459–473, 2024.

[10] B. Setiawan, D. P. Nugraha, A. Irawan, R. J. Nathan, and Z. Zoltan, “User innovativeness and FinTech adoption in Indonesia,” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, vol. 7, no. 3, p. 188, 2021.

[11] P. Pamungkas, T. Arifin, I. Trinugroho, E. Lau, and B. S. Sergi, “COVID-19, stability and regulation: evidence from Indonesian banks,” Studies in Economics and Finance, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 741–750, 2024.

[12] N. Saputro, P. Pamungkas, I. Trinugroho, Y. C. Mahulette, B. S. Sergi, and G. L. Thye, “Google Trends, bank popularity and depositors’ fears in Indonesia,” Managerial Finance, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1089–1100, 2024.

[13] M. Ahmad, C. Xie, M. H. Ibrahim, and Y. Liu, “Fin- Tech innovation, stability and efficiency: evidence from Malaysian bank industry,” International Journal of Finance & Economics, 2025.

[14] D. B. Vukovi´c, M. K. Hassan, B. Kwakye, A. Febtinugraini, and M. Shakib, “Does FinTech matter for financial inclusion and financial stability in BRICS markets?” Emerging Markets Review, vol. 61, p. 101164, 2024.

[15] S. N. M. Daud and A. H. Ahmad, “Financial inclusion, economic growth and the role of digital technology,” Finance Research Letters, vol. 53, p. 103602, 2023.

[16] K. Ahmad, “Islamic social financing and efficient zakat distribution: impact of fintech adoption among the asnaf in Malaysia,” Journal of Islamic Marketing, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 2253–2284, 2023.

[17] F. Fang, C. Ventre, M. Basios, L. Kanthan, D. Martinez- Rego, F. Wu, and L. Li, “Cryptocurrency trading: a comprehensive survey,” Financial Innovation, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 13, 2022.

[18] S. Corbet, B. Lucey, A. Urquhart, and L. Yarovaya, “Cryptocurrencies as a financial asset: a systematic analysis,” International Review of Financial Analysis, vol. 62, pp. 182–199, 2019.

[19] E. Bouri, T. Saeed, X. V. Vo, and D. Roubaud, “Quantile connectedness in the cryptocurrency market,” Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, vol. 71, p. 101302, 2021.

[20] O. Özdemir, “Cue the volatility spillover in the cryptocurrency markets during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from DCC-GARCH and wavelet analysis,” Financial Innovation, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 12, 2022.

[21] W. Hanif, H.-U. Ko, L. Pham, and S. H. Kang, “Dynamic connectedness and network in the high moments of cryptocurrency, stock, and commodity markets,” Financial Innovation, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 84, 2023.

[22] W. M. A. Ahmed, “How do Islamic equity markets respond to good and bad volatility of cryptocurrencies? The case of Bitcoin,” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, vol. 70, p. 101667, 2021.

[23] M. R. Rabbani, S. M. Billah, M. Shaik, M. Rahman, and R. Boujlil, “Dynamic connectedness, spillover, and optimal hedging strategy among FinTech, Sukuk, and Islamic equity markets,” Global Finance Journal, vol. 58, p. 100901, 2023.

[24] I. Yousaf and L. Yarovaya, “Spillovers between the islamic gold-backed cryptocurrencies and equity markets during the COVID-19: a sectoral analysis,” Pacific- Basin Finance Journal, vol. 71, p. 101705, 2022.

[25] K.-C. Yen, W.-Y. Nie, H.-L. Chang, and L.-H. Chang, “Cryptocurrency return dependency and economic policy uncertainty,” Finance Research Letters, vol. 56, p. 104182, 2023.

[26] P. Zhang, D. Kong, K. Xu, and J. Qi, “Global economic policy uncertainty and the stability of cryptocurrency returns: the role of liquidity volatility,” Research in International Business and Finance, vol. 67, p. 102165, 2024.

[27] M. I. H. Chowdhury, M. Hasan, E. Bouri, and Y. Tang, “Emotional spillovers in the cryptocurrency market,” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, vol. 41, p. 100713, 2024.

[28] W. Mensi, M. U. Rehman, X. V. Vo, and S. H. Kang, “Spillovers and multiscale relationships among cryptocurrencies: a portfolio implication using high frequency data,” Economic Analysis and Policy, vol. 82, pp. 449–479, 2024.

[29] G. A. Abbasi, L. Y. Tiew, J. Tang, Y.-N. Goh, and R. Thurasamy, “The adoption of cryptocurrency as a disruptive force: deep learning-based dual stage structural equation modelling and artificial neural network,” PLOS ONE, vol. 16, no. 3, p. e0247582, 2021.

[30] A. Rafiuddin, J. C. T. Gaytan, and E. G. Contreras, “The influence of macro policy uncertainty on blockchain adoption, crypto economy, and digital asset infrastructure,” Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2025.

[31] M. R. Rabbani, M. K. Hassan, S. M. Billah, M. Shaik, and Z. A. Halim, “Religion vs. ethics: tail dependence between Sukuk, green bond, Islamic FinTech, and fourth industrial revolution assets,” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, vol. 90, p. 102683, 2025.

[32] Y. Trichilli, M. Boujelbene Abbes, and A. Mouna, “Hedging Islamic assets with the blockchain halal index: a regime-switching model,” Review of Financial Economics, 2025.

[33] F. Allen, X. Gu, and J. Jagtiani, “FinTech, cryptocurrencies, and CBDC: financial structural transformation in China,” Journal of International Money and Finance, vol. 124, p. 102625, 2022.

[34] S. Gupta, D. K. Pandey, A. El Ammari, and G. P. Sahu, “Do perceived risks and benefits impact trust and willingness to adopt CBDCs?” Research in International Business and Finance, vol. 66, p. 101993, 2023.

[35] G. R. Ungson and S. Soorapanth, “The ASEAN blockchain roadmap,” Asia and the Global Economy, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 100047, 2022.

Cite This Article

Choose your preferred format

format_quote
Musa, Mustafa, Azakiyullah, Raden Aur Aachman. "FinTech Infrastructure and Cryptocurrency Markets in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review with Evidence from Indonesia and Malaysia." Financial Technology and Innovation, vol. Volume 6, no. Issue 2, 2026, pp. 17–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/FinTech-I.060203
Musa, M., Azakiyullah, R. (2026). FinTech Infrastructure and Cryptocurrency Markets in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review with Evidence from Indonesia and Malaysia. Financial Technology and Innovation, Volume 6(Issue 2), 17–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/FinTech-I.060203
Musa, Mustafa, Azakiyullah, Raden Aur Aachman. "FinTech Infrastructure and Cryptocurrency Markets in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review with Evidence from Indonesia and Malaysia." Financial Technology and Innovation Volume 6, no. Issue 2 (2026): 17–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/FinTech-I.060203
Musa, M., Azakiyullah, R. (2026) 'FinTech Infrastructure and Cryptocurrency Markets in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review with Evidence from Indonesia and Malaysia', Financial Technology and Innovation, Volume 6(Issue 2), pp. 17–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/FinTech-I.060203
Musa M, Azakiyullah R. FinTech Infrastructure and Cryptocurrency Markets in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review with Evidence from Indonesia and Malaysia. Financial Technology and Innovation. 2026;Volume 6(Issue 2):17–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/FinTech-I.060203
M. Musa, R. Azakiyullah, "FinTech Infrastructure and Cryptocurrency Markets in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review with Evidence from Indonesia and Malaysia," Financial Technology and Innovation, vol. Volume 6, no. Issue 2, pp. 17–25, 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/FinTech-I.060203
policy

Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions, and data presented in this article are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of ASPG, the journal, or its editors. ASPG and the editors disclaim responsibility for any harm arising from the use of any ideas, methods, instructions, or products described in this article, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.

Digital Archive Ready