Volume 4 • Issue 1 • PP: 32–45 • 2024
The FinTech Maturity Divide: Benchmarking AI Services, Open Banking, and Embedded Finance Across Financial Service Sectors
View PDF Abstract
The global financial services industry is undergoing a structural transformation driven by the convergence of artificial intelligence, open application programming interfaces, digital payment infrastructure, and embedded financial services. Despite sustained investment activity, the empirical evidence base for comparing technology adoption maturity across institutional types and capability domains remains fragmented, leaving executives and policymakers without the benchmarking evidence needed for informed strategic investment decisions. This paper addresses that gap through a systematic multi-dimensional maturity study drawing on primary survey data from financial industry professionals across multiple countries and a consumer adoption survey of retail banking customers, covering five technology dimensions: artificial intelligence services, open banking and application programming interface ecosystems, digital payment infrastructure, embedded finance, and regulatory technology. Challenger banks and FinTech startups substantially outperform traditional incumbent institutions on open banking and embedded finance, while traditional institutions retain a relative advantage in regulatory technology compliance. Payment processors dominate on digital payment maturity but show the widest capability gap in artificial intelligence and embedded finance. Consumer adoption analysis reveals pronounced age-related disparities in buy-now-pay-later, cryptocurrency, and robo-advisory services with direct implications for financial inclusion strategy. Regression analysis identifies application programming interface readiness as the single strongest predictor of overall maturity, confirming that foundational data architecture investment has compounding returns across all five technology domains. The paper contributes a validated five-dimension maturity framework, a regression model of the institutional and strategic predictors of overall FinTech maturity, and ten evidence-based strategic recommendations for executives navigating the technology transformation of financial services.
Keywords
References
[1] D. W. Arner, J. N. Barberis, and R. P. Buckley, “The evolution of FinTech: A new post-crisis paradigm?” Georgetown Journal of International Law, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 1271–1319, 2016.
[2] P. Gomber, J.-A. Koch, and M. Siering, “Digital finance and FinTech: Current research and future research directions,” Journal of Business Economics, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 537–580, 2017.
[3] I. Lee and Y. J. Shin, “FinTech: Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges,” Business Horizons, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 35–46, 2018.
[4] T. Philippon, “On FinTech and financial inclusion,” NBER Working Paper, vol. 26330, 2019.
[5] T. Puschmann, “FinTech,” Business & Information Systems Engineering, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 69–76, 2017.
[6] A.-L. Mention, “The future of FinTech,” Research- Technology Management, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 59–63, 2019.
[7] P. Gomber, R. J. Kauffman, C. Parker, and B. W. Weber, “On the FinTech revolution: Interpreting the forces of innovation, disruption, and transformation in financial services,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 220–265, 2018.
[8] I. Goldstein, W. Jiang, and G. A. Karolyi, “To Fin- Tech and beyond,” Review of Financial Studies, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1647–1661, 2019.
[9] F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989.
[10] V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425–478, 2003.
[11] E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. New York: Free Press, 2003.
[12] KPMG International, “Pulse of FinTech H2 2022,” KPMG International, Tech. Rep., 2023, available at https://kpmg.com/xx/en/home/insights/2023/02/pulseof- fintech-h2-2022.html.
[13] D. A. Zetzsche, R. P. Buckley, D. W. Arner, and J. N. Barberis, “Regulating a revolution: From regulatory sandboxes to smart regulation,” Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 31– 103, 2017.
[14] Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, “Sound practices: Implications of FinTech developments for banks and bank supervisors,” Bank for International Settlements, Tech. Rep., 2018, iSBN 978-92-9259- 120-5.
[15] A. Lagna and M. N. Ravishankar, “Making the world a better place with FinTech research,” Information Systems Journal, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 61–102, 2022.
[16] B. G. Buchanan, “Artificial intelligence in finance,” The Alan Turing Institute, Tech. Rep., 2019.
[17] J. Jagtiani and C. Lemieux, “The roles of alternative data and machine learning in FinTech lending: Evidence from the LendingClub consumer platform,” Journal of Economics and Business, vol. 100, pp. 43–53, 2019.
[18] L. Cao, “Artificial intelligence and finance: Challenges, techniques, and opportunities,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 64:1–64:37, 2022.
[19] J. W. Schindler, “FinTech and financial innovation: Drivers and depth,” Finance and Economics Discussion Series, vol. 2017-081, 2017.
[20] M. Zachariadis and P. Ozcan, “The API economy and digital transformation in financial services: The case of open banking,” SWIFT Institute Working Paper, vol. 2016-001, 2017, available via SWIFT Institute.
[21] L. Brodsky and L. Oakes, “Data sharing and open banking,” McKinsey & Company, Tech. Rep., 2017, mcKinsey Global Banking & Securities Practice.
[22] S. Nakamoto, “Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system,” 2008, available at https://bitcoin.org/ bitcoin.pdf.
[23] L. W. Cong and Z. He, “Blockchain disruption and smart contracts,” Review of Financial Studies, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1754–1797, 2019.
[24] D. Wojcik, “Financial geography I: Exploring FinTech—Maps and concepts,” Progress in Human Geography, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 600–610, 2021.
[25] N. Iman, “Is mobile payment still relevant in the FinTech era?” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, vol. 30, pp. 72–82, 2018.
[26] P. K. Ozili, “FinTech research: Current research topics and future research directions,” Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 15, no. 9, p. 404, 2022.
[27] H.-S. Ryu, “What makes users willing or reluctant to use FinTech? the moderating effect of user type,” Industrial Management & Data Systems, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 541–569, 2018.
[28] I. Anagnostopoulos, “FinTech and RegTech: Impact on regulators and banks,” Journal of Economics and Business, vol. 100, pp. 7–25, 2018.
[29] G. Baptista and T. Oliveira, “Understanding mobile banking: The unified theory of acceptance and use of
technology combined with cultural moderators,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 50, pp. 418– 430, 2015.
[30] C. M. Christensen, The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press, 1997.
[31] P. K. Ozili, “Impact of digital finance on financial inclusion and stability,” Borsa Istanbul Review, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 329–340, 2018.
[32] T. Muganyi, L. Yan, Y. Yin, H. Sun, X. Gong, and F. Taghizadeh-Hesary, “FinTech, regtech, and financial development: Evidence from China,” Financial Innovation, vol. 8, p. 29, 2022.
Cite This Article
Choose your preferred format