Volume 10 • Issue 2 • PP: 19-25 • 2022
Coded DCO-OFDM Techniques in Intensity Modulation/Direct Detection (IM/DD) Systems
View PDF Abstract
Optical wireless communications (OWC) are among the best alternative techniques for transmitting information-laden optical radiation across a free-space channel from one place to another. DC-biased optical OFDM (DCO-OFDM) is a technique that sacrifices the power efficiency to transmit unipolar OFDM signals. The primary drawback with DCO-OFDM is its clipping noise, which causes distortion and lowers the bit error rate (BER). Thus, in this paper, we show the performance of DCO with different coded techniques to improve the BER in additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) for IM/DD systems. The experimental results show that the coded DCO-OFDM has the best performance. Furthermore, turbo coding has the best coding technique added to the DCO-OFDM system.
Keywords
References
[1] C. Xi-jun, X. Jiang-ning and C. Ke-jin1, M. Jian-guo, Analysis on the Feasibility and Application of GPS One-Way Communication Capability. In proceeding of International conference on Computer Technology and Development, Seoul, 357– 362, 2009.
[2] G. Cossu, R. Corsini E., Ciaramella, Indoor High-Speed Optical Wireless Communications: Recent Developments. In proceeding of 16th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON), Graz, 6-10 July, 1 – 4, 2014.
[3] A. C. Boucouvalas, P. Chatzimisios, Z. Ghassemlooy and M. Uysal,K. Yiannopoulos. Standard for Indoor Optical Wireless Communication", IEEE Communications Magazine, 24 – 31, 2009.
[4] C. Cao, An Integer Linear Programming Approach for Topology Design in OWC Networks. IEEE Globecom Workshops, New Orleans, LO, 1 – 5, 2008.
[5] L. Chevalier and S. Sahuguede, A. Vergonjanne , Optical Wireless Links as an alternative to Radio-Frequency for Medical Body Area Networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 33(9), 2015.
[6] A. V. T. Cartaxo, Impact of Modulation Frequency on Cross-Phase Modulation Effect in Intensity Modulation-Direct Detection WDM Systems. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 10(9), 2018.
[7] J. C. Cartledge, A. S. Karar, 100 Gb/s Intensity Modulation and Direct Detection. Journal of Light Technology, 32 (16), 2014.
[8] T. Nguyen ,S. Mhatli ,E. Giacoumidis ,L. V. Compernolle ,M. Wuilpart and P. Mégret, Fiber Nonlinearity Equalizer Based on Support Vector Classification for Coherent Optical OFDM. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 8(2), 2019.
[9] M. Chen ,X. Xiao ,J. Yu ,F. Li ,Z. R. Huang and H. Zhou, “Demonstration of SoftwareReconfigurable Real-Time FEC-Enabled 4/16/64-QAM-OFDM Signal Transmission in an XBand RoF System,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters , vol. 8, no. 2, April 2020.
[10] R. B. Nunes, A. Shahpari, J. A. L. Silva, M. Lima, P. S. de B. Andr´e, M. E. V. Segatto, Experimental Demonstration of a 33.5 Gb/s OFDM based PON with Subcarrier Pre-emphasis.Journal of Photonics Letters, 28(8)00, 860-863, 2016.
[11] S.D. Dissanayake, J. Armstrong, Comparison of ACO-OFDM, DCO OFDM and ADO-OFDM in IM/DD Systems. J. of Lightwave Technology, 31(7), 1063-1072, 2013.
[12] Ming Jiang, Direct Current Bias Optimization of the LDPC Coded DCO-OFDM Systems. IEEE PHOTONICS TECHNOLOGY LETTERS, 27(19), 2015.
[13] J. Armstrong and B. J. C. Schmidt, Comparison of asymmetrically clipped optical OFDM and DCbiased optical OFDM in AWGN. IEEE Commun. Lett., 12(5), 343–345, 2017.
[14] Y. Li, M. Safari, R. Henderson, and H. Haas, "Performance Analysis of SPAD-based OFDM," arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.06302, 2019.
Cite This Article
Choose your preferred format