2571-1075ISSN (Online)
Volume 12 , Issue 2 , PP: 01-18, 2026 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article
Islam Ibrahim Shoheb 1 * , Sonia Ahmed 2 , Haretha Aljabr 3
Doi: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJBES.120201
Purpose: this study aims to develop a Building Information Modeling (BIM)-enabled methodology that integrates Saudi Building Code (SBC) seismic detailing provisions for reinforced concrete shear walls into a rule-based parametric modeling environment. The research seeks to enhance compliance traceability, automate code interpretation, and improve quantity accuracy for mixed-use high-rise buildings with significant vertical zoning effects. Approach, Selected SBC shear wall provisions were translated into computable IF–THEN engineering rules linked to BIM parameters. The methodology incorporated vertical zoning, axial load ratio evaluation, rule-based reinforcement detailing, and automated quantity extraction. The framework was validated using a large-scale Saudi healthcare mixed-use case study through comparison of BIM-derived quantities with independent SBC-consistent reference calculations on a zone-by-zone basis. Findings, Results indicate that axial load ratio governs boundary element activation and confinement reinforcement demand. BIM-generated reinforcement distributions aligned closely with SBC intent, showing average differences of 2–4% for concrete volume, 3–6% for longitudinal reinforcement, and 4–8% for confinement reinforcement. Boundary confinement was concentrated within the lower 30–40% of building height, while zone-based detailing reduced upper-zone reinforcement by approximately 15–25%. Practical Implications, the methodology improves automated compliance verification, reduces overdesign, enhances reproducibility, and supports efficient structural modeling for complex mixed-use buildings. Originality/Value, the study establishes a direct digital linkage between SBC provisions, parametric BIM modeling, and automated structural quantity outputs.
Parametric compliance , Rule-based modeling , Axial load interaction , Vertical zoning , Digital structural workflow
[1] ACI Committee 318, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19). Farmington Hills, MI, USA: American Concrete Institute, 2019.
[2] J. Smith and A. Johnson, “Advancements in building information modeling for sustainable construction,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 146, no. 3, p. 04020003, 2020, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001856 .
[3] S. Azhar, “Building information modeling (BIM): Trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry,” Leadership and Management in Engineering, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 241–252, 2011.
[4] L. Chen and M. Li, “Integrating AI and BIM for enhanced structural analysis,” Automation in Construction, vol. 128, p. 103759, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103759.
[5] I. Shoheb, M. Metwally, and I. R. Endut, “Parametric sensitivity of axial–flexural interaction in reinforced concrete shear walls for optimized design and structural efficiency,” International Journal of BIM and Engineering Science (IJBES), vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 75–96, 2026.
[6] J. W. Wallace and K. Orakcal, “ACI 318 requirements for seismic design of structural walls,” ACI Structural Journal, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 499–508, 2002.
[7] T. Paulay and M. J. N. Priestley, Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 1992.
[8] Bohl and P. Adebar, “Plastic hinge length in high-rise concrete shear walls,” ACI Structural Journal, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 148–157, 2011.
[9] K. Beyer, A. Dazio, and M. J. N. Priestley, “Quasi-static cyclic tests of two U-shaped reinforced concrete walls,” ACI Structural Journal, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 353–364, 2014.
[10] J. W. Baker, C. A. Cornell, and H. Krawinkler, “Probabilistic seismic performance assessment of structural systems,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1381–1400, 2018.
[11] T. H. Almusallam, Y. A. Al-Salloum, A. A. Almusallam, and S. H. Alsayed, “Performance of reinforced concrete shear walls under seismic loading,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 146, no. 4, pp. 1–13, 2020.
[12] R. Sacks, C. Eastman, G. Lee, and P. Teicholz, BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2018.
[13] W. Solihin and C. Eastman, “Classification of rule-based BIM checking processes,” Automation in Construction, vol. 53, pp. 69–82, 2015.
[14] J. Zhang and N. M. El-Gohary, “Automated extraction of construction regulatory requirements from textual documents,” Automation in Construction, vol. 69, pp. 1–14, 2016.
[15] European Committee for Standardization, Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. Brussels, Belgium: CEN, 2004.
[16] Saudi Building Code National Committee, Saudi Building Code Requirements for Concrete Structures (SBC 304). Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Saudi Building Code National Committee, 2018.
