2571-1075ISSN (Online)
Volume 5 , Issue 1 , PP: 73-89, 2022 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article
Aya Amino 1 * , Sonia Ahmad 2
Doi: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJBES.050105
In the last decade, the projects of the Architectural, Engineering, and Construction Industry (AEC) in Syria faced endless difficulties and problems, in addition to the intense competition between the construction sector companies. This prompted many companies to want to adopt best practices to reach their goals, therefore any work organization should have a clear vision of what it wants to achieve, for what purpose, and how? Building Information Modeling (BIM) around the world has proven its ability to solve all the problems facing engineering projects. Unfortunately, AEC companies despite all that great value did not use BIM. For many reasons, mainly: there is no comprehensive descriptive approach that explains how to apply it and a mechanism that shows how to measure and develop it within companies, in addition to their fear of adopting modern technologies that push them to need new engineering competencies because of not realizing its importance. The purpose of this research is to propose a methodology to measure and develop BIM maturity in Syria in general. In addition, to assess the level of maturity of our institutional BIM through the BIMM maturity matrix in particular. This is done by applying the most important models for measuring maturity around the world on a number of Syrian AEC companies in the private and public sectors. Analyzing the performance of BIM in it, comparing the results, and assessing the level of institutional maturity. Then conducting analyses and comparisons based on these conclusions and making additional recommendations and proposals to develop the matrix in accordance with practical reality in order to reach the optimal and integrated level for construction projects
Building Information Modelin , BIM Maturity , BIM Maturity Matrix , Construction Projects , Syrian Companies
[1] Shaban, M. & Elhendawi, A., 2018. Building Information Modeling in Syria: Obstacles and Requirements for Implementation. International Journal of BIM and Engineering Science, 1(1), pp. 42-64.
[2] Ahmed, Sonia, et al. "BIM Performance Improvement Framework for Syrian AEC Companies." International Journal of BIM and Engineering Science 1.1 (2018): 21-41.
[3] Succar, B. (2010). Building information modelling maturity matrix. In Handbook of research on building information modeling and construction informatics: Concepts and technologies (pp. 65-103). IGI Global.
[4] Safour, R., Ahmed, S. & Zaarour, B., 2021. BIM Adoption around the World. International Journal of BIM and Engineering Science, 4(2), pp. 49 -63.
[5] Omar, H.S., 2015. Solutions for the UAE architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry to mandate building information modeling (BIM) (Doctoral dissertation , The British University in Dubai (BUiD))
[6] Ahmed, S., Dlask, P., Shaban, M. & Selim, O., 2018. The possibility of Applying BIM in Syrian Building Projects. Engineering for Rural Development. Jelgava.
[7] Elhendawi, A., 2018. Methodology for BIM Implementation in KSA in AEC Industry. Master of Science MSc in Construction Project Management ed. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh Napier University, UK.
[8] Evans, M., Farrell, P., Elbeltagi, E., Mashali, A. and Elhendawi, A., 2020. Influence of partnering agreements associated with BIM adoption on stakeholder's behaviour in construction mega-projects. International Journal of BIM and Engineering Science, 3(1), pp.1-20.
[9] Yusof, N., Ishak, S. & Doheim, R., 2018. An Exploratory Study of Building Information Modelling Maturity in the Construction Industry. International Journal of BIM and Engineering Science, 1(1), pp. 6-19.
[10] Lepkova, N., Maya, R., Ahmed, S. & Šarka, V., 2019. BIM Implementation Maturity Level and Proposed Approach for the Upgrade in Lithuania. International Journal of B IM and Engineering Science, 2(1), pp. 22-38.
[11] Banawi, A., Aljobaly, O. & Ahiable, C., 2019. A Comparative Review of Building Information Modeling Frameworks. International Journal of BIM and Engineering Science, 2(2), pp. 23-49.
[12] Ahmed, S., Dlask, P. & Hasan, B., 2014. Deviation in the cost of projects. Construction Macroeconomics Conference.
[13] Pavlovskis, M., Antucheviciene, J., & Migilinskas, D. (2017). Assessment of buildings redevelopment possibilities using MCDM and BIM techniques. Procedia Engineering, 172, 846-850.
[14] Al Hammoud, E., 2021. Comparing BIM Adoption Around the World, Syria’s Current Status and Furture. International Journal of BIM and Engineering Science, 4(2), pp. 64 -78.
[15] Elhendawi, A., Smith, A. & Elbeltagi, E., 2019. Methodology for BIM implementation in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of BIM and Engineering Science, 2(1), pp. 1-21.
[16] Elhendawi, A., Omar, H., Elbeltagi, E. & Smith, A., 2020. Practical approach for paving the way to motivate BIM non-users to adopt BIM. International Journal of BIM and Engineering Science, 2(2), pp. 1-22.
[17] Salami, H. & Alothman, K., 2022. Engineering Training and its Importance for Building Information Modelling. International Journal of BIM and Engineering Science, 5(1), pp. 41 -60.
[18] Hamma-adama, M., Kouider, T. & Salman, H., 2020. Analysis of barriers and drivers for BIM adoption. International journal of BIM and engineering science, 3(1), pp. 18-41.
[19] Al Hammoud, E. & Ahmed, S., 2022. Submitting BIM to the Educational Plan for the Faculty of Architecture According to NARS and ARS Standards. International Journal of BIM and Engineering Science, 5(1), pp. 20-40.
[20] Mia, R., 2016. Performance Management for Syrian Construction Projects. International Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. DOI: 10.5923/j.ijcem.20160503.0
[21] Stojanovska-Georgievska, Lihnida, et al. "BIM in the Center of Digital Transformation of the Construction Sector—The Status of BIM Adoption in North Macedonia." Buildings 12.2 (2022): 218.
[22] Amaratunga, D., & Baldry, D. (2002). Moving from performance measurement to performance management. Facilities.
[23] Paulk, Mark C., et al. "Capability maturity model, version 1.1." IEEE software 10.4 (1993): 18-27.
[24] Bew, M., & Richards, M. (2008). BIM maturity model. In Construct IT, Autumn 2008 Members’ Meeting. Brighton, UK.
[25] Azzouz, A., & Hill, P. (2017). Hunting for perfection: How Arup measures BIM maturity on projects worldwide. Construction Research and Innovation, 8(2), 49-54.
