2692-4048ISSN (Online)
2770-0070ISSN (Print)
Volume 19 , Issue 1 , PP: 97-107, 2025 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article
Mohammed Q. Jawad 1 * , Mohammed Yousif 2 *
Doi: https://doi.org/10.54216/FPA.190109
Lately, handling big data has become challenging due to its large size and complexity. To address scalability, availability, real-time performance, flexibility, and various Quality of Service (QoS) characteristics, Data Distribution Services (DDS) middleware offers extensive integration with mission-critical, real-time, and high-performance networks. Unlike traditional client-server communication models, Data Distribution Services rely on a publish/subscribe communication model. DDS enhances the quality of video streaming through its efficient data delivery approach. On internet protocols, a significant portion of traffic is generated by content delivery applications, such as video streaming. This study examines how Data Distribution Services are well suited for streaming real-time, full-motion videos over communication networks. Several experimental studies have been conducted to compare video streaming using a VLC player with an overlay of Data Distribution Services. Our application-aware routing system enables mobile network operators to utilize their networks more efficiently, allows service providers to improve customer satisfaction, and ensures end-users experience desirable service quality across various network applications. The findings of this study demonstrate the efficiency of DDS in delivering high-quality video streams while utilizing low network bandwidth. Additionally, the results highlight that DDS offers greater flexibility and scalability, making it a highly important technology for video distribution over internet protocol networks. It achieves this by using narrower bandwidth while maintaining high-quality video stream delivery.
Quality of Service , Object Management Group , Video Streaming Support , Electronic-learning , Middleware
[1] B. White, J. Lepreau, L. Stoller, R. Ricci, S. Guruprasad, M. Newbold, M. Hibler, C. Barb, and A. Joglekar, “An integrated experimental environment for distributed systems and networks,” SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev., vol. 36, no. SI, pp. 255–270, Dec. 2002. [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/844128.844152.
[2] D. Raychaudhuri, I. Seskar, M. Ott, S. Ganu, K. Ramachandran, H. Kremo, R. Siracusa, H. Liu, and M. Singh, “Overview of the ORBIT radio grid testbed for evaluation of next-generation wireless network protocols,” in Proc. IEEE Wireless Commun. Netw. Conf. (WCNC), 2005, pp. 1664–1669.
[3] S. Yassine and A. Stanulov, “A comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for the purpose of predicting Norwegian air passenger traffic,” Int. J. Math. Stat. Comput. Sci., vol. 2, pp. 28–43, 2024. doi: 10.59543/ijmscs.v2i.7851.
[4] S. Jina, S. Tarnoi, and W. Kumwilaisak, “QoS-aware multi-rate H.264 scalable video multicast with network coding in lossy networks,” in Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Electr. Eng./Electronics, Comput., Telecommun. Inf. Technol. (ECTI-CON), May 2012, pp. 1–4.
[5] J. M. Lopez-Vega, J. Sanchez-Monedero, J. Povedano-Molina, and J. M. Lopez-Soler, “QoS policies for audio/video distribution over DDS middleware,” in Proc. Real-Time Embedded Syst. Workshop, 2008.
[6] ITU-T and ISO/IEC JTC 1, “Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services,” ITU-T Recommendation H.264 and ISO/IEC 14496-10 (MPEG-4 AVC), Version 8 (including SVC extension), July 2007.
[7] T. Wiegand, G. J. Sullivan, G. Bjontegaard, and A. Luthra, “Overview of the H.264/AVC video coding standard,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 560–576, 2003.
[8] G. J. Sullivan and T. Wiegand, “Video compression—from concepts to the H.264/AVC standard,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 18–31, 2005.
[9] D. Marpe, T. Wiegand, and G. J. Sullivan, “The H.264/MPEG-4 advanced video coding standard and its applications,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 134–142, 2006.
[10] G. J. Sullivan, H. Yu, S.-I. Sekiguchi, et al., “New standardized extensions of MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 for professional-quality video applications,” in Proc. 14th IEEE Int. Conf. Image Process. (ICIP), San Antonio, TX, USA, Sep. 2007, pp. I13–I16.
[11] J.-B. Kempf, VideoLAN project. [Online]. Available: http://www.videolan.org/.
[12] J.-S. Lee, F. De Simone, T. Ebrahimi, N. Ramzan, and E. Izquierdo, “Quality assessment of multidimensional video scalability,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 38–46, 2012.
[13] H. Kim and S.-G. Min, "Priority-based QoS MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks," in Proc. 2009 Int. Symp. Parallel Distrib. Process, IEEE Comput. Soc., 2009, pp. 1–8.
[14] I. Slama, B. Shrestha, B. Jouaber, and D. Zeghlache, “A hybrid MAC with prioritization for wireless sensor networks,” in Proc. 33rd IEEE Conf. Local Comput. Netw, 2008, pp. 274–281.
[15] I. Rhee, A. Warrier, M. Aia, and J. Min, “Z-MAC: A hybrid MAC for wireless sensor networks,” in Proc. ACM Sensys, 2005, pp. 90–101.
[16] M. A. Yigitel, O. Durmaz Incel, and C. Ersoy, “Diff-MAC: A QoS-aware MAC protocol with differentiated services and hybrid prioritization for wireless multimedia sensor networks,” in Proc. 6th ACM Workshop QoS Security Wireless Mobile Netw., 2010, pp. 62–69.
[17] Z. Shelby and C. Bormann, 6LoWPAN: The Wireless Embedded Internet. Wiley, 2009.
[18] Y. J. Li, C. S. Chen, Y.-Q. Song, and Z. Wang, “Real-time QoS support in wireless sensor networks: A survey,” in Proc. 7th IFAC Int. Conf. Fieldbuses Netw. Ind. Embedded Syst. (FeT’07), Nov. 2007.
