2692-4048ISSN (Online)
2770-0070ISSN (Print)
Volume 16 , Issue 2 , PP: 202-212, 2024 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article
Milena Avarez Tapia 1 * , Carlos G. Rosero Martínez 2 , Josue R. Lımaıco Mına 3 , Saidkarimova Matlyuba Ishanovna 4
Doi: https://doi.org/10.54216/FPA.160213
This paper addresses the question that is global as decision making in the scenario of ambiguity. Given the conflicting or less dependable information, it also becomes necessary to look for approaches that assist us. Conventional strategic planning approaches work relatively well with straightforward and precise information. These become inadequate with situations that are ambiguous. To address this challenge, we adopt the Neutrosophic Hierarchy Method that integrates with SWOT analysis in addressing the challenge. As such, we learn to evaluate or assess the four components of SWOT: Strengths, opportunities, weaknesses and threats in wider terms. However, we do appreciate that often what we assess is not black and white but in shades of color. The conclusion is that for complex decision-making, this approach seems more appropriate and offers better results than others offer. The key aim of this article is to put forth a novel perspective on how decisions should be made in the face of uncertainty. Most of all, we expect to be helpful to both policymakers and strategists in the sense of providing a tool, which can be useful when it comes to the practical inconsistencies that are quite frequently in excess of reasonable solutions.
, Indeterminate Likert Scale , Neutrosophic Hierarchical Method , SWOT Analysis , Decision making under uncertainty , Complexity and indeterminacy , Multicriteria strategies , Strategic planning , Neutrosophic evaluation , Data ambiguity , Uncertainty management , Analysis tools
[1] F. Smarandache, “Introduction to Neutroalgebraic and Antialgebraic Structures (Revisited),” Neutrosophic Sets Syst., vol. 31, pp. 1–17, 2020
[2] GF Acurio, FJ Caicedo, I. FBarcos and SB Esparza, “Comparison of Neutrosophic Personality Operators in Lawyers from the City of Santo Domingo”, Neutrosophic Sets Syst., vol. 52, pp. 173–182, 2022.
[3] A. Kargın, A. Dayan, and N. M. Şahin, “Generalized Hamming Similarity Measure Based on Neutrosophic Quadruple Numbers and Its Applications to Legal Sciences,” Neutrosophic Set Syst., vol. 40, pp. 45–67, 2021.
[4] Dutta, P. (2018). Human health risk assessment under uncertain environment and its SWOT analysis. The Open Public Health Journal, 11(1)..
[5] I. Deli, “Operators on single-valued trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers and SVTN group decision making,” Neutrosophic Sets Syst., vol. 22, pp. 131–150, 2018.
[6] R. Tan and W. Zhang, “Multi-attribute decision making method based on DEMATEL and fuzzy distance of trapezoidal fuzzy neutrosophic numbers and its application in typhoon disaster assessment,” J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 3413–3439, 2020.
[7] P. Biswas, S. Pramanik, and B. C. Giri, “Distance measurement based MADM strategy with interval trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers,” Neutrosophic Sets Syst., vol. 19, pp. 40–46, 2018.
[8] J. Chen, S. Zeng, and C. Zhang, “A single-valued neutrosophic linguistic topsis approach based on OWA distance for green supplier evaluation and selection in low-carbon supply chains,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 15, no. 7, p. 1439, 2018.
[9] M. Abdel-Basset, M. Mohamed, and F. Smarandache, “An extension of the AHP-SWOT neutrosophic analysis for strategic planning and decision making,” Symmetry (Basel), Vol. 10, No. 4, p. 116, 2018.
[10] MM Leonor, GS Easud and PP Fernando, “Indeterminate Likert scale in social science research”, Int. J. Neutrosophic Sci., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 289–291, 2022.
[11] Barragán-Pazmiño, B. Ordóñez, A. Echeverría, M. Toulkeridis, T. (2024). Integrating Machine Learning Models for Enhanced Soil Organic Carbon Estimation: A Multi-Model Fusion Approach. Fusion: Practice and Applications, 16(2), 22-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/FPA.160202
[12] Taghavifard, M. T., Amoozad Mahdiraji, H., Alibakhshi, A. M., Zavadskas, E. K., & Bausys, R. (2018). An extension of fuzzy SWOT analysis: An application to information technology. Information, 9(3), 46.
[13] Jdid, M. Alhabib, R. (2022). Neutrosophical dynamic programming. International Journal of Neutrosophic Science, 18(03), 157-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.1803013
[14] M., A. (2022). An advanced optimization technique for integrating IoT and cloud computing on manufacturing performance for supply chain management. Journal of Intelligent Systems and Internet of Things, 07(02), 30-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/JISIoT.070203
[15] A., D. V., I. (2022). Statistical Machine Learning Model and Commodity Futures Volatility Information for Financial Stock Market Forecasting. American Journal of Business and Operations Research, 07(02), 32-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.070203
[16] N., JG, G.O., L. Culqui , J. (2024). Fusion Data Management and Modeling Techniques in Power Quality Compensation Using SAPF. Fusion: Practice and Applications, 16(2), 08-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/FPA.160201
[17] E., J. J., A. Y., M. (2022). Compensatory Fuzzy Logic with Single Valued Neutrosophic Numbers in the Analysis of University Strategic Management. International Journal of Neutrosophic Science, 18(04), 151-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.180414
