2692-4048ISSN (Online)
2770-0070ISSN (Print)
Volume 15 , Issue 2 , PP: 298-312, 2024 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article
Murodjon Sultanov 1 * , Iroda Abdullayeva 2 , Botirjon Karimov 3
Doi: https://doi.org/10.54216/FPA.150225
This paper suggests a novel fusion approach of combining Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to enhance multi-criteria decision-making for energy management. In this way, by integrating the two powerful methodologies, the fusion approach is enabled that allows for dealing with the complex and highly dynamic character of energy management decisions for which there is required the careful consideration of many conflicting criteria. The method uses A to derive weightings for each decision criterion via AHP based on expert judgments, ensuring all relevant factors are systematically considered proportionately. Subsequently, TOPSIS is applied to evaluate and rank the alternatives such that the most effective energy solutions close to the ideal solution are identified. This integration of AHP with TOPSIS leads to comprehensive analysis that draws both the strengths of these techniques and provides a powerful tool to make informed and balanced decisions in the energy sector. The effectiveness of this fusion method, when applied, could then lead to the attainment of subtler findings and dependable suggestions, making it a beneficial contribution to this field of energy management.
fusion method , data mining methods , hierarchy analysis method , decision-making process , priority vectors , global priorities , analytical framework , method selection , evaluative criteria , comparative analysis , visualization techniques , regression methods.
[1] Saaty, R.W. The Analytic Hierarchy Process-What It Is and How It Is Used. Math. Model. 1987, 9, 176. [CrossRef].
[2] Harker P.T., L.G. Vargas. The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty’s Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science, 1987, Vol. 33, No. 11, pp. 1383-1403.
[3] Chen Y., Yu J., Shahbaz K., Xevi E. A GIS-Based Sensitivity Analysis of Multi-Criteria Weights, 18th World IMACS / MODSIM Congress, 2009.
[4] Stummer C.A., Kiesling E., Gutjahr W.J., Multicriteria decision support system for competence-driven project portfolio selection, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 2009, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 379-401.
[5] Packham I.S.J., Rafiq M.Y., Borthwick M.F., Denham S.L. Interactive visualization for decision support and evaluation of robustness – in theory and in practice, Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2005, Vol. 19, pp. 263-280.
[6] Marinoni O., Hoppe A. Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process to support sustainable use of geo-resources in metropolitan areas, Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2006, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 154-164.
[7] Subramanian N., Ramanathan R. A review of applications of Analytic Hierarchy Process in operations management, International Journal of Production Economics, 2012, No. 138, pp. 215-241.
[8] Forman E.H., Gass S.I. The analytic hierarchy process – an exposition, Operations Research, 2001, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 469-486.
[9] Saaty T.L. Axiomatic foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Management Science, 1986, Vol. 32, No. 7, pp. 841-855.
[10] Saaty T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980, - 290 p.
[11] Chen, Y.-C.; Yu, T.-H.; Tsui, P.-L.; Lee, C.-S. Erratum to: A Fuzzy AHP Approach to Construct International Hotel Spa Atmosphere Evaluation Model. Qual. Quant. 2014, 48, 2371. [CrossRef]
[12] Guru, S., Mahalik, D.K. A Comparative Study on Performance Measurement of Indian Public Sector Banks Using AHP-TOPSIS and AHP-Grey Relational Analysis. OPSEARCH 2019, 56, 1213-1239. [CrossRef]
[13] Yaraghi, N., Tabesh, P., Guan, P., Zhuang, J. Comparison of AHP and Monte Carlo AHP under Different Levels of Uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2015, 62, 122–132. [CrossRef]
[14] Ramík, J. Analytický Hierarchický Proces (AHP) a Jeho Využití v Malém a Stˇredním Podnikání; Slezská univerzita Obchodnˇe podnika- telská fakulta v Karviné: Karviná, Czechia, 2000, ISBN 9788072480883.
[15] Ishankhodjayev, G., Sultanov, M., Parpiyeva, R. & Norboyeva, N. 2022. Development of intelligent information decision support systems. The 6th International Conference on Future Networks & Distributed Systems has processing errors. https://doi.org/10.1145/35842023584203.
[16] Belton V., Gear A. On a shortcoming of Saaty’s method of analytical hierarchies, Omega, 1983, Vol. 11, pp. 228–230.
[17] Ishizaka A., Labib A. Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process, Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, No. 38, pp. 14336-14345.
[18] Fichtner J. On deriving priority vectors from matrices of pairwise comparisons, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 1986, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 341-345.
[19] Ishankhodjayev, G., Sultanov, M., Mirzaahmedov, D. & Azimov, D. 2021. Optimization of Information Processes of Multilevel Intelligent Systems. 1st International workshop on Communication management, Soft Computing and Digital Economy. https://doi.org/10.1145/3508072.3508212.
[20] Sultanov, M., Ishankhodjayev, G., Parpiyeva, R. & Norboyeva, N. 2023. Creation of intelligent information decision support systems. IV International Scientific Conference “Construction Mechanics, Hydraulics and Water Resources Engineering” https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202336504031.
[21] Sayyora Qulmatova, Botirjon Karimov, Munis Abdullayev, and Shirin Karimova. 2023. Crop production under different climatic conditions by analyzing agricultural data using multiple linear regression, winter holt, and artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Future Networks & Distributed Systems (ICFNDS '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1145/3584202.3584238.
[22] Sayyora Qulmatova, Botirjon Karimov, and Dilmurod Azimov. 2023. Data analysis and forecasting in agricultural enterprises. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Future Networks & Distributed Systems (ICFNDS '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 536–541. https://doi.org/10.1145/3584202.3584282
[23] Stieglitz, N., Mirbabaie, M., & Ehnis, C. (2019). Sense-making of digitalization: A methodological framework for empirical research. Journal of Business Research, 99, 365-376.
[24] Ishankhodjayev G.K., Sultanov M.B. Development of Information Support for Decision-Making in Intelligent Energy Systems, International conference on information science and communications technologies (ICISCT 2022): applications, trends and opportunities, November 3-5, 2022. DOI: 10.1109/ICISCT55600.2022.10146931.
[25] Khan, R. L., Priyanshu, D., Ather, D., & Allataifeh, H. (2022, December). An Implementation of Internet of Things-based Live Temperature and Humidity Monitoring System. In 2022 11th International Conference on System Modeling & Advancement in Research Trends (SMART) (pp. 277-281). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/SMART55829.2022.10046723.
[26] Allataifeh H., & Aziz A. (2024) Transforming Education in the Digital Age: Harnessing Technology for Enhanced Learning and Engagement ISSN: 2189-1036 – The IAFOR International Conference on Education – Hawaii 2024 Official Conference Proceedings https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2189-1036.2024.36.
[27] Allataifeh, H. A., & Moghavvemi, S. (2022). Innovation as a Management Question: Can Innovation Be Managed?. In Innovative Economic, Social, and Environmental Practices for Progressing Future Sustainability (pp. 136-155). IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-9590-9.
