Volume 26 , Issue 1 , PP: 181-191, 2025 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article
P. Srikanth Rao 1 , R. Balaji 2 , Nasreen kausar 3 , Tonguc Cagin 4 *
Doi: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.260116
We introduce new methods for the trigonometric Pythagorean neutrosophic set (TPNSS) via interaction aggregating operator in this study. A combination of the trigonometric operator and the Pythagorean neutrosophic set. The universal aggregation function is used to study the novel averaging and geometric interaction operations of Pythagorean neutrosophic numbers. The TPNSS are commutative, associative, idempotent, and boundedness compatible. TPNSS interaction weighted averaging, TPNSS interaction weighted geometric, generalized TPNSS interaction weighted averaging, and generalized TPNSS interaction weighted geometric are the four new interaction aggregating operators that are introduced. The Euclidean distance, Hamming distance, and score values are often assumed to represent the aggregation functions.
Aggregating operator , TPNSIWA , TPNSIWG , GTPNSIWA , GTPNSIWG
[1] L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Information and control, 8(3), (1965), 338-353.
[2] K. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy sets and Systems, 20(1), (1986), 87-96.
[3] R.R. Yager, Pythagorean membership grades in multi criteria decision making, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems, 22, (2014), 958-965.
[4] D. Liang and Z. Xu, The new extension of TOPSIS method for multiple criteria decision making with hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy sets, Applied Soft Computing, 60, (2017), 167-179.
[5] F. Smarandache, A unifying field in logics, Neutrosophy neutrosophic probability, set and logic, American Research Press, Rehoboth, (1999).
[6] T. Senapati, R.R. Yager, Fermatean, fuzzy sets. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 11, (2020), 663- 674.
[7] Cuong B.C, Kreinovich V, Picture fuzzy sets a new concept for computational intelligence problems, third world congress on information and communication technologies, WICT 2013. IEEE,1-6.
[8] Ashraf S, Abdullah S and Mahmood T, Spherical fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and their application in group decision making problems, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, (2019), 1-19.
[9] Jin, H., Ashraf, S., Abdullah, S., Qiyas, M., Bano, M. and Zeng, S, Linguistic spherical fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications in multi-attribute decision making problems, Mathematics, 7(5), 2019, 413.
[10] Rafiq, M., Ashraf, S., Abdullah, S., Mahmood, T. and Muhammad, S, The cosine similarity measures of spherical fuzzy sets and their applications in decision making. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 36(6), 2019, 6059-6073.
[11] Hatamleh, R., Heilat, A. S., Palanikumar, M., & Al-Husban, A. Different operators via weighted averaging and geometric approach using trigonometric neutrosophic interval-valued set and its extension, Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 80, 2025, 194-213.
[12] H. Wang, Y. Liu, and X. Zhang, ”A novel hybrid decision-making framework based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and VIKOR for supplier selection,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 95, pp. 106514, 2020.
[13] J. Kim, S. Lee, and M. Park, ”Multi-criteria decision-making approach for evaluating sustainable energy systems using the TOPSIS method,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 286, pp. 125354, 2021.
[14] M. Palanikumar, N. Kausar, H. Garg, A. Iampan, S. Kadry, M. Sharaf, Medical robotic engineering selection based on square root neutrosophic normal interval-valued sets and their aggregated operators, AIMS Mathematics, 8(8), (2023), 17402–17432.
