ASPG Menu
search

American Scientific Publishing Group

verified Journal

International Journal of Neutrosophic Science

ISSN
Online: 2690-6805 Print: 2692-6148
Frequency

Continuous publication

Publication Model

Open access journal. All articles are freely available online with no APC.

International Journal of Neutrosophic Science
Full Length Article

Volume 19Issue 1PP: 166-176 • 2022

Agriculture Production Decision Making using Generalized q-Rung Neutrosophic Soft Set Method

G. Shanmugam 1* ,
M. Palanikumar 1 ,
K. Arulmozhi 2 ,
Aiyared Iampan 3 ,
Said Broumi 4
1Department of Advanced Mathematical Science, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha University, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai-602105, India
2Department of Mathematics, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Tamil Nadu, Chennai-600073, India
3Fuzzy Algebras and Decision-Making Problems Research Unit, Department of Mathematics, School of Science, University of Phayao, Mae Ka, Mueang, Phayao 56000, Thailand
4Laboratory of Information Processing, Faculty of Science Ben M’Sik, Universit´s Hassan II, BP 7955 Casablanca, Morocco
* Corresponding Author.
verified

Open Access & Copyright

© 2022 The Author(s). Published by ASPG. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Received: April 19, 2022 Accepted: August 13, 2022

Abstract

This paper introduces the generalized q-rung neutrosophic soft set (GqRNSSS) theory and its use to solve actual

problems. We also define a few operations that make use of the GqRNSSS. The GqRNSSS is constructed

by generalizing both the Pythagorean neutrosophic soft set (PyNSSS) and Pythagorean fuzzy soft set (PyFSS).

We give a method for agricultural output that is based on the proposed similarity measure of GqRNSSS. If two

GqRNSSS are compared, it can be determined whether or not a person produces good agricultural output. We

support a strategy for dealing with the decision-making (DM) problem that makes use of the generalized qrung

soft set model. In this article, we discuss the application of a similarity measure between two GqRNSSS

in agricultural output. Show how they can be successfully applied to challenges with uncertainty.

Keywords

GqRNSSS PyFSS decision making problem

References

[1] A. B. Al-Nafee, S. Broumi, L. A. Al Swidi, n-valued refined neutrosophic crisp sets, International Journal

of Neutrosophic Science, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 87–95, 2021.

[2] S. Alkhazaleh, A. R. Salleh, N. Hassan, Possibility fuzzy soft set, Advances in Decision Sciences, vol.

2011, Article ID 479756, 18 pages, 2011.

[3] K. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 87–96, 1986.

[4] B. C. Cuong, Picture fuzzy sets, Journal of Computer Science and Cybernetics, vol. 30, no. 4, 409–420,

2014.

[5] B. C. Cuong, V. Kreinovich, Picture fuzzy sets a new concept for computational intelligence problems,

Proceedings of 2013 Third World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies (WICT

2013), IEEE, pp. 1–6, 2013.

[6] F. Karaaslan, Possibility neutrosophic soft sets and PNS-decision making method, Applied Soft Computing,

vol. 54, 403–414, 2017.

[7] R. Jansi, K. Mohana, F. Smarandache, Correlation measure for Pythagorean neutrosophic sets with T and

F as dependent neutrosophic components, Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, vol. 30, 202–212, 2019.

[8] M. Lathamaheswari, S. Broumi, F. Smarandache, S. Sudha, Neutrosophic perspective of neutrosophic

probability distributions and its application, International Journal of Neutrosophic Science, vol. 17, no.

2, 96–109, 2021.

[9] P. K. Maji, R. Biswas, A. R. Roy, Fuzzy soft set, Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 3, 589–602,

2001.

[10] P. K. Maji, R. Biswas, A. R. Roy, On intuitionistic fuzzy soft set, Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics, vol. 9,

no. 3, 677–692, 2001.

[11] P. Majumdar, S. K. Samantab, Generalized fuzzy soft sets, Computers and Mathematics with Applications,

vol. 59, 1425–1432, 2010.

[12] D. Molodtsov, Soft set theory first results, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 37, 19–31,

1999.

[13] M. Palanikumar, K. Arulmozhi, On various ideals and its applications of bisemirings, Gedrag and Organisatie

Review, vol. 33, no, 2, pp. 522–533, 2020.

[14] M. Palanikumar, K. Arulmozhi, On intuitionistic fuzzy normal subbisemirings of bisemirings, Nonlinear

Studies, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 717–721, 2021.

[15] M. Palanikumar, K. Arulmozhi, On new ways of various ideals in ternary semigroups, Matrix Science

Mathematic, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 6–9, 2020.

[16] M. Palanikumar, K. Arulmozhi, (α, β)-Neutrosophic subbisemiring of bisemiring, Neutrosophic Sets

and Systems, vol. 48, pp. 368–385, 2022.

[17] M. Palanikumar, K. Arulmozhi, On various tri-ideals in ternary semirings, Bulletin of the International

Mathematical Virtual Institute, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 79–90, 2021.

[18] M. Palanikumar, K. Arulmozhi, On Pythagorean normal subbisemiring of bisemiring, Annals of Communications

in Mathematics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 63–72, 2021.

[19] M. Palanikumar, K. Arulmozhi, On various almost ideals of semirings, Annals of Communications in

Mathematics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 17–25, 2021.

[20] X. D. Peng, Y. Yang, J. P. Song, Pythagorean fuzzy soft set and its application, Computer Engineering,

vol. 41, no. 7, 224–229, 2015.

[21] S. Alkhazaleh, A. R. Salleh, Generalized interval valued fuzzy soft set, Journal of Applied Mathematics,

vol. 2012, Article ID 870504, 18 pages, 2012.

[22] F. Smarandache, A unifying field in logics. Neutrosophy: neutrosophic probability, set and logic, American

Research Press, Rehoboth, 1999.

[23] S. Dhouib, S. Broumi, M. Lathamaheswari, Single valued trapezoidal neutrosophic travelling salesman

problem with novel greedy method, the dhouib matrix TSP1, International Journal of Neutrosophic Science,

vol. 17, no. 2, 144–157, 2021.

[24] R. R. Yager, Pythagorean membership grades in multi criteria decision-making, IEEE Transactions on

Fuzzy Systems, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 958–965, 2014.

[25] Y. Yang, C. Liang, S. Ji, T. Liu, Adjustable soft discernibility matrix based on picture fuzzy soft sets and

its applications in decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, vol. 29, 1711–1722, 2015.

[26] L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Information and Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, 1965.

Cite This Article

Choose your preferred format

format_quote
Shanmugam, G., Palanikumar, M., Arulmozhi, K., Iampan, Aiyared, Broumi, Said. "Agriculture Production Decision Making using Generalized q-Rung Neutrosophic Soft Set Method." International Journal of Neutrosophic Science, vol. Volume 19, no. Issue 1, 2022, pp. 166-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.190112
Shanmugam, G., Palanikumar, M., Arulmozhi, K., Iampan, A., Broumi, S. (2022). Agriculture Production Decision Making using Generalized q-Rung Neutrosophic Soft Set Method. International Journal of Neutrosophic Science, Volume 19(Issue 1), 166-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.190112
Shanmugam, G., Palanikumar, M., Arulmozhi, K., Iampan, Aiyared, Broumi, Said. "Agriculture Production Decision Making using Generalized q-Rung Neutrosophic Soft Set Method." International Journal of Neutrosophic Science Volume 19, no. Issue 1 (2022): 166-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.190112
Shanmugam, G., Palanikumar, M., Arulmozhi, K., Iampan, A., Broumi, S. (2022) 'Agriculture Production Decision Making using Generalized q-Rung Neutrosophic Soft Set Method', International Journal of Neutrosophic Science, Volume 19(Issue 1), pp. 166-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.190112
Shanmugam G, Palanikumar M, Arulmozhi K, Iampan A, Broumi S. Agriculture Production Decision Making using Generalized q-Rung Neutrosophic Soft Set Method. International Journal of Neutrosophic Science. 2022;Volume 19(Issue 1):166-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.190112
G. Shanmugam, M. Palanikumar, K. Arulmozhi, A. Iampan, S. Broumi, "Agriculture Production Decision Making using Generalized q-Rung Neutrosophic Soft Set Method," International Journal of Neutrosophic Science, vol. Volume 19, no. Issue 1, pp. 166-176, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.190112
policy

Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions, and data presented in this article are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of ASPG, the journal, or its editors. ASPG and the editors disclaim responsibility for any harm arising from the use of any ideas, methods, instructions, or products described in this article, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.

Digital Archive Ready