2692-2967ISSN (Online)
2770-0216ISSN (Print)
Volume 3 , Issue 2 , PP: 61-76, 2021 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article
Muzafer Saracevic 1 * , Nan Wang 2 , Elma Elfic Zukorlic 3 , Suad Becirovic 4
Doi: https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.030201
Blockchain technology has received more and more attention from all walks of life and has also been sought after by the market and financial institutions. More and more financial institutions and Internet companies have begun to participate in the research of blockchain technology. The application scenarios are also constantly expanding, and the landing in the financial field is the focus of all social concerns. This article takes Agricultural Bank as an example, analyzes its current advantages and disadvantages in using blockchain technology, and proposes policy recommendations based on this to provide a reference for joint-stock commercial banks to better use blockchain technology to improve business performance. Based on the theoretical analysis, this article studies the use of blockchain technology by joint-stock commercial banks, and selects Agricultural Bank, which has a well-developed financial technology in joint-stock commercial banks, as a case study. From the operating background of the agricultural bank and the cross-border payment and settlement business, the background begins with the agricultural bank's own business practices in blockchain technology and the traditional cross-border business and the innovative development of agricultural bank's blockchain technology, and then the application of event analysis to the application effects of agricultural bank's blockchain technology analysis. This paper analyzes the SWOT-PEST of the agricultural bank's use of blockchain technology, combined with the theoretical analysis of blockchain technology in this article, comprehensively analyzes the agricultural bank's use of blockchain technology in four aspects: policy, economy, society, and technology. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and challenges. Through analysis, we can have a comprehensive view on the application of blockchain technology by Agricultural Bank, and based on this, we can summarize the problems that Agricultural Bank may have in applying blockchain technology. Through the analysis of the blockchain, we can see that the growth rate of agricultural bank's net profit was higher in 2013 and 2014. Finally, the article puts forward suggestions for the development of agricultural bank under the blockchain technology.
Blockchain Technology, Sustainable Supply Chain, Financial Innovation, Agricultural Bank, Event Analysis Method, SWOT-PEST Analysis Method
[1]Fabio Bertoni, & Stefano Lugo. (2018) “Detecting abnormal changes in credit default swap spreads using matching-portfolio models”,Journal of Banking & Finance, 54(09)pp.90.
[2]Annette Mackenzie. (2015)”The fintech revolution”,London Business School Review, 26(3), pp.50-53.
[3]Gina C Pieters, & Christoffer Koch. (2017) “Blockchain Technology Disrupting Traditional Records Systems”, Social Science Electronic Publishing, 6(2),pp. 1-3.
[4]Weizhi Meng, Elmar Tischhauser, Qingju Wang, Yu Wang, & Jinguang Han. (2018) “When Intrusion Detection Meets Blockchain Technology”, a review. IEEE Access, 6(1), pp.10179-10188.
[5]Christian Esposito, Alfredo De Santis, Genny Tortora, Henry Chang, & Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo. (2018)“Blockchain: A Panacea for Healthcare Cloud-based Data Security and Privacy”, IEEE Cloud Computing, 5(1), pp.31-37.
[6]Matthew B. Hoy. (2017) “An Introduction to The Blockchain And Its Implications for Libraries And Medicine”,Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 36(3), pp.273-279.
[7]Valentina Gatteschi, Fabrizio Lamberti, Claudio Demartini, Chiara Pranteda, & Victor Santamaria. (2018) “To Blockchain or Not to Blockchain:That is The Question”, It Professional20(2), pp.62-74.
[8]Kim, Henry, & Laskowski, Marek. (2018) “A perspective on Blockchain Smart Contracts: Reducing Uncertainty And Complexity in Value Exchange”,Ssrn Electronic Journal, pp.1-6.
[9]Jong-Hyouk Lee. (2017) “Bidaas: Blockchain Based Id as A Service”,IEEE Access, (99), pp.1-1.
[10]Christian Sillaber, & Bernhard Waltl. (2017) “Life Cycle of Smart Contracts in Blockchain Ecosystems”, Datenschutz und Datensicherheit - DuD,41(8), pp.497-500.
[11]Singh, Madhusudan, & Kim, Shiho. (2017) “Intelligent Vehicle-trust Point: Reward Based Intelligent Vehicle Communication Using Blockchain”,Optical Engineering, 33(1), pp.701-709.
[12]Bert Scholtens, Pontus Cerin, & Lars Hassel. (2008) “Sustainable development and socially responsible finance and investing”,Sustainable Development, 16(3), pp.137-140.
[13]Florian Hawlitschek, Benedikt Notheisen, & Timm Teubner. (2018) “The limits of trust-free systems: a literature review on blockchain technology and trust in the sharing economy”,Electronic Commerce Research & Applications, pp.29.
[14]SINCLAIR DAVIDSON, PRIMAVERA DE FILIPPI, & JASON POTTS. (2018) “Blockchains and the economic institutions of capitalism”,Journal of Institutional Economics, 14(4), pp.1-20.
[15]M. Andrychowicz, S. Dziembowski, D. Malinowski, & Ł. Mazurek. (2016) “Secure multiparty computations on bitcoin”,Communications of the Acm,59(4),pp.76-84.
[16]David Yermack. (2017) “Corporate governance and blockchains”,Social Science Electronic Publishing, 21(1), pp.7-31.
[17]Polasik, M., Piotrowska, A., Wisniewski, T. P., Kotkowski, R., & Lightfoot, G. (2015) “Price fluctuations and the use of bitcoin”,an empirical inquiry. ,20(1), pp.9-49.
[18]LI Hui-jia, & LONG Min. (2015) “Construction of one-way hash function based on spatiotemporal chaotic system with double-pertubation”,Journal of Chinese Computer Systems, 41(2), pp.191-199.
[19]Yongzhi Wang, Yulong Shen, Hua Wang, Jinli Cao, & Xiaohong Jiang. (2016) “Mtmr: ensuring mapreduce computation integrity with merkle tree-based verifications”,IEEE Transactions on Big Data, PP(99), pp.1-1
