American Journal of Business and Operations Research

Journal DOI

https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR

Submit Your Paper

2692-2967ISSN (Online) 2770-0216ISSN (Print)

Volume 12 , Issue 2 , PP: 15-31, 2025 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article

Leveraging Time Lag-Based Diffusion Models to Predict Innovation Adoption for Optimized Product Development

Muddassar Sarfraz 1 *

  • 1 School of Management, Zhejiang Shuren University, PR China - (muddassar@zjsru.edu.cn)
  • Doi: https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.120202

    Received: June 17, 2024 Revised: September 27, 2024 Accepted: December 14, 2024
    Abstract

    The suggested models for the spread of technical breakthroughs make use of a phase structure to illustrate the steps involved in becoming familiar with the problem and making a choice. For it to portray genuine adopting conduct, a time-lag factor is included into the dispersion process. Depicts a two-step dissemination process by taking into account the reliance of adopting on the informed group of potential purchasers. Assuming that a prospective customer first becomes intrigued by an upcoming the item's availability and then accepts the novel idea at an ulterior point, a method of analysis for sales functions that incorporates time delay is proposed. The efficient propagation method for invention is shown using the various lag factors. Applying nonlinear regression modelling to worldwide shipping data of Acer PCs and Samsung smartphones experimentally validates the suggested models for mathematics. Several comparison models are used to evaluate the predicting abilities of the suggested models. By integrating a distributed time delay function into the implementation manage, a theoretical intergenerational diffusion model is created. To measure how long it takes for innovation to be eventually accepted, the distributed time lag function that follows the Erlang distributions is used. This framework incorporates switch and substituting, two forms of pragmatist shift behaviour. Using real shipping data of LCD (Liquid Crystal Display) computer monitors from consecutive generations, the predicted effectiveness of the suggested methods is examined and contrasted with well-established research. Here is the total accuracy of the approaches that have been proposed: When contrasted with more conventional models, MGDM 1 achieves a 99.33% accuracy rate, MGDM 2 a 99.81% rate, and MGDM 3 a 99.91% accuracy rate.

    Keywords :

    LCD , MGDM , OLS , NLS , OR , MSE , RMSE , MAD

    References

    [1] Lobna Osman, A PSPICE Fast Model for the Single Electron Transistor, International Journal of Wireless and Ad Hoc Communication, Vol. 0 , No. 1 , (2019) : 8-23 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/IJWAC.000101)

    [2] Ahmed A. Elngar , Salah-ddine KRIT, Performance Analysis of Machine Learning based Botnet Detection and Classification Models for Information Security, Journal of Cybersecurity and Information Management, Vol. 0 , No. 1 , (2019) : 44-53 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/JCIM.000104)

    [3] Mohamed Elsharkawy , Ahmed N. Al Masri, A Novel Image Encryption with Deep Learning Model for Secure Content based Image Retrieval, Journal of Cybersecurity and Information Management, Vol. 0 , No. 2 , (2019) : 54-64 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/JCIM.000105)

    [4] F. M. Bass, ‘‘A new product growth model for consumer durables,’’ Manage. Sci., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 215–227, 2020.

    [5] P. K. Kapur, O. Singh, and R. Mittal, ‘‘Software reliability growth and innovation diffusion models: An interface,’’ Int. J. Rel., Quality Saf. Eng., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 339–364, Dec. 2004.

    [6] K. Shankar, Recent Advances in Sensing Technologies for Smart Cities, International Journal of Wireless and Ad Hoc Communication, Vol. 1 , No. 1 , (2020) : 05-15 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/IJWAC.010101)

    [7] C. Vivek,M. Indu,N. Nandhini, Speech Recognition Using Artificial Neural Network, Journal of Journal of Cognitive Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5 , No. 2 , (2023) : 08-14 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/JCHCI.050201)

    [8] Vidyul Narayanan,Nithya P.,Sathya M., Effective lung cancer detection using deep learning network, Journal of Journal of Cognitive Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5 , No. 2 , (2023) : 15-23 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/JCHCI.050202)

    [9] S. Yang, X. Gou, M. Yang, Q. Shao, C. Bian, M. Jiang, and Y. Qiao, ‘‘Software bug number prediction based on complex network theory and panel data model,’’ IEEE Trans. Rel., vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 162–177, Mar. 2022.

    [10] P. Vizarreta, K. Trivedi, B. Helvik, P. Heegaard, A. Blenk, W. Kellerer, and C. Mas Machuca, ‘‘Assessing the maturity of SDN controllers with software reliability growth models,’’ IEEE Trans. Netw. Service Manage. vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1090–1104, Sep. 2018.

    [11] A. Sariga , J. Uthayakumar, Type 2 Fuzzy Logic based Unequal Clustering algorithm for multi-hop wireless sensor networks, International Journal of Wireless and Ad Hoc Communication, Vol. 1 , No. 1 , (2020) : 33-46 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/IJWAC.010102)

    [12] P. Sheela Rani,Harini M.,Nandhitha N.,Teena A. Naahz G., A Decentralized and Cooperative Methodology For Organ Donation Management Based on Ethereum Blockchain, Journal of Cognitive Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 6 , No. 1 , (2023) : 08-17 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/JCHCI.060101)

    [13] Malini Srinivasan,Jishnu Dineshan,Gondi Surender Dhanunjay,Shamala Ramappa, Measuring the Coverage of Assembly elections and Covid 19 during the pandemic in India, Journal of Cognitive Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 6 , No. 1 , (2023) : 18-31 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/JCHCI.060102)

    [14] K. Pandey, A. Mukherjee, P. Rai, and A. Kumar, “VAEs meetdiffusion models: Efficient and high-fidelity generation,” in Pro-ceedings of NeurIPS Workshop on DGMs and Applications, 2021.

    [15] F. Bao, C. Li, J. Zhu, and B. Zhang, “Analytic-DPM: an AnalyticEstimate of the Optimal Reverse Variance in Diffusion Probabilis-tic Models,” in Proceedings of ICLR, 2022.

    [16] T. Dockhorn, A. Vahdat, and K. Kreis, “Score-based generativemodeling with critically-damped Langevin diffusion,” in Proceed-ings of ICLR, 2022.

    [17] N. Liu, S. Li, Y. Du, A. Torralba, and J. B. Tenenbaum, “Composi-tional Visual Generation with Composable Diffusion Models,” inProceedings of ECCV, 2022

    [18] I. Oguz, J. D. Malone, Y. Atay, and Y. K. Tao, “Self-fusion forOCT noise reduction,” in Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging,vol. 11313, p. 113130C, SPIE, 2020.

    [19] Khadija Shazly , Dina A. Salem , Nacereddine Hammami , Ahmed I. B. ElSeddawy, A Review on Distributed Denial of Service Detection in Software Defined Network, International Journal of Wireless

    and Ad Hoc Communication, Vol. 5 , No. 2 , (2022) : 08-18 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/IJWAC.050201)

    [20] Prabu S. , Alekhya A. , Kiran K. Chatragadda , Venkateswarlu Lingala, Secured Authentication of Node in Mobile Adhoc Network, International Journal of Wireless and Ad Hoc Communication, Vol. 5 , No. 2 , (2022) : 19-29 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/IJWAC.050202)

    [21] R. Q. Charles, H. Su, M. Kaichun, and L. J. Guibas, “PointNet:Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmenta-tion,” in Proceedings of CVPR, pp. 77–85, 2017.

    [22] G. Balakrishnan, A. Zhao, M. R. Sabuncu, J. Guttag, and A. V.Dalca, “An unsupervised learning model for deformable medicalimage registration,” in Proceedings of CVPR, pp. 9252–9260, 2018.

    [23] X. Li, T.-K. L. Wong, R. T. Chen, and D. Duvenaud, “Scalablegradients for stochastic differential equations,” in Proceedings ofAISTATS, pp. 3870–3882, 2020.

    [24] T. Park, M.-Y. Liu, T.-C. Wang, and J.-Y. Zhu, “Semantic imagesynthesis with spatially-adaptive normalization,” in Proceedingsof CVPR, pp. 2337–2346, 2019

    [25] I. A. Chaudhry and A. A. Khan, ‘‘A research survey: Review of flexible job shop scheduling techniques,’’ Int. Trans. Oper. Res., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 551–591, May 2016.

    [26] H. Zhou, Y. Feng, and L. Han, ‘‘the hybrid heuristic genetic algorithm for job shop scheduling,’’ Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 191–200, Jul. 2001.

    [27] J. Su, Y. Yang, and R. Duan, ‘‘A CA-based heterogeneous model for knowledge dissemination inside knowledge-based organizations,’’ J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 2087–2097, 2018.

    [28] A. V. Barenji, R. V. Barenji, D. Roudi, and M. Hashemipour, ‘‘A dynamic multi-agent-based scheduling approach for SMEs,’’ Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 89, no. 9, pp. 3123–3137, Apr. 2017.

    [29] D. Ouelhadj and S. Petrovic, ‘‘A survey of dynamic scheduling in manufacturing systems,’’ J. Scheduling, vol. 12, no. 4, p. 417, 2009.

    [30] A. H. Kashan, B. Karimi, and F. Jolai, ‘‘an effective hybrid multi-objective genetic algorithm for bi-criteria scheduling on a single batch processing machine with non-identical job sizes,’’ Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 911–922, Sep. 2010.

    [31] J. Su, M. Wei, and A. Liu, ‘‘A robust predictive–reactive allocating approach, considering random design change in complex product design processes,’’ Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1210–1228, 2018.

    [32] S. H. H. Madni, M. S. A. Latiff, Y. Coulibaly, and S. M. Abdulhamid, ‘‘Recent advancements in resource allocation techniques for cloud computing environment: A systematic review,’’ Cluster Comput., vol. 20, pp. 2489–2533, Sep. 2017.

    [33] B. Guo, Y. Liu, L. Wang, V. O. Li, C. K. Jacqueline, and Z. Yu, ‘‘Task allocation in spatial crowdsourcing: Current state and future directions,’’ IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1749–1764, Jun. 2018.

    [34] J. Yang, J. Su, and L. Song, ‘‘Selection of manufacturing enterprise innovation design project based on consumer’s green preferences,’’ Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 1375, Mar. 2019.

    [35] A. Morris, M. Halpern, R. Setchi, and P. Prikett, ‘‘Assessing the challenges of managing product design change through-life,’’ J. Eng. Des., vol. 27, nos. 1–3, pp. 25–49, 2016.

     

    Cite This Article As :
    Sarfraz, Muddassar. Leveraging Time Lag-Based Diffusion Models to Predict Innovation Adoption for Optimized Product Development. American Journal of Business and Operations Research, vol. , no. , 2025, pp. 15-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.120202
    Sarfraz, M. (2025). Leveraging Time Lag-Based Diffusion Models to Predict Innovation Adoption for Optimized Product Development. American Journal of Business and Operations Research, (), 15-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.120202
    Sarfraz, Muddassar. Leveraging Time Lag-Based Diffusion Models to Predict Innovation Adoption for Optimized Product Development. American Journal of Business and Operations Research , no. (2025): 15-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.120202
    Sarfraz, M. (2025) . Leveraging Time Lag-Based Diffusion Models to Predict Innovation Adoption for Optimized Product Development. American Journal of Business and Operations Research , () , 15-31 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.120202
    Sarfraz M. [2025]. Leveraging Time Lag-Based Diffusion Models to Predict Innovation Adoption for Optimized Product Development. American Journal of Business and Operations Research. (): 15-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.120202
    Sarfraz, M. "Leveraging Time Lag-Based Diffusion Models to Predict Innovation Adoption for Optimized Product Development," American Journal of Business and Operations Research, vol. , no. , pp. 15-31, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.120202