1
Department of Computer Sciences, University of Novi Pazar, Serbia
(muzafers@uninp.edu.rs)
2
Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun 130117, China
(ctuwangnan@126.com)
3
International University of Novi Pazar, Novi Pazar, Serbia
(g.menadzer@uninp.edu.rs )
4
International University of Novi Pazar, Novi Pazar, Serbia
(s.becirovic@uninp.edu.rs)
Abstract :
To evaluate and promote ecologically responsible practices in the sintering business, conducting a sustainability evaluation of sintering flue gas is essential. An important step in making iron and steel, sintering releases flue gas emissions that, if not controlled, may harm the environment. Reducing emissions, improving energy efficiency, managing waste, using water, utilizing resources, monitoring community effects, complying with regulations, conducting a life cycle assessment, and continuously improving are all part of the assessment's extensive scope. When these aspects are considered, stakeholders may better understand the economic, social, and environmental effects of sintering flue gas management. This paper used the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodology to evaluate the criteria. We used the DEMATEL method as an MCDM method. The DEMATEL is used to build the relation between the criteria. We collect ten criteria in this study. We compute the criteria weights to show this study’s best and worst criterion. The DEMATEL method is used to draw the effect diagram between criteria.
Keywords :
Multi-criteria Decision Making; Sustainability; Sintering Flue Gas; DEMATEL Method.
References :
[1] S. Ren, F. Guo, J. Yang, L. Yao, Q. Zhao, and M. Kong, “Selection of carbon materials and modification methods in low-temperature sintering flue gas denitrification,” Chemical Engineering Research and Design, vol. 126, pp. 278–285, 2017.
[2] T. Zhu, W. Xu, Y. Guo, and Y. Li, “Pollutants emission and control for sintering flue gas,” Ironmaking and Steelmaking Processes: Greenhouse Emissions, Control, and Reduction, pp. 59–74, 2016.
[3] S. Zhao et al., “Research of mercury removal from sintering flue gas of iron and steel by the open metal site of Mil-101 (Cr),” Journal of hazardous materials, vol. 351, pp. 301–307, 2018.
[4] J. Wang and W. Zhong, “Simultaneous desulfurization and denitrification of sintering flue gas via composite absorbent,” Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1104–1111, 2016.
[5] G. Zhou, W. Zhong, Y. Zhou, J. Wang, and T. Wang, “3D simulation of sintering flue gas desulfurization and denitration in a bubbling gas absorbing tower,” Powder Technology, vol. 314, pp. 412–426, 2017.
[6] Y. Zuo, H. Yi, and X. Tang, “Metal-modified active coke for simultaneous removal of SO2 and NO x from sintering flue gas,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 377–383, 2015.
[7] W. Chen, J. Luo, L. Qin, and J. Han, “Selective autocatalytic reduction of NO from sintering flue gas by the hot sintered ore in the presence of NH3,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 164, pp. 146–150, 2015.
[8] J. Zhou et al., “Utilization of semi-dry sintering flue gas desulfurized ash for SO2 generation during sulfuric acid production using boiling furnace,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 327, pp. 914–923, 2017.
[9] S. Wang, Q. Zhang, G. Zhang, Z. Wang, and P. Zhu, “Effects of sintering flue gas properties on simultaneous removal of SO2 and NO by ammonia-Fe (II) EDTA absorption,” Journal of the Energy Institute, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 522–527, 2017.
[10] H. Zhou, J. Chen, M. Zhou, and K. Cen, “Experimental investigation on the mixing performance of heating gas into the low temperature sintering flue gas selective catalyst reaction facilities,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 115, pp. 378–392, 2017.
[11] Z. Yu, X. Fan, M. Gan, X. Chen, Q. Chen, and Y. Huang, “Reaction behavior of SO2 in the sintering process with flue gas recirculation,” Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 687–697, 2016.
[12] X. Fan et al., “Elimination behaviors of NOx in the sintering process with flue gas recirculation,” ISIJ International, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 2074–2081, 2015.
[13] S. Ren, F. Guo, Q. Zhao, J. Yang, L. Yao, and M. Kong, “Sintering flue gas desulfurization with different carbon materials modified by microwave irradiation,” Journal of Iron and Steel Research International, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 979–984, 2017.
[14] L. Yang et al., “The efficient removal of thallium from sintering flue gas desulfurization wastewater in ferrous metallurgy using emulsion liquid membrane,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 24, pp. 24214–24222, 2017.
[15] S.-B. Tsai, “Using the DEMATEL model to explore the job satisfaction of research and development professionals in china’s photovoltaic cell industry,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 81, pp. 62–68, 2018.
[16] J.-I. Shieh and H.-H. Wu, “Measures of consistency for DEMATEL method,” Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 781–790, 2016.
[17] G. Büyüközkan and S. Güleryüz, “An integrated DEMATEL-ANP approach for renewable energy resources selection in Turkey,” International journal of production economics, vol. 182, pp. 435–448, 2016.
[18] S. Gandhi, S. K. Mangla, P. Kumar, and D. Kumar, “Evaluating factors in implementation of successful green supply chain management using DEMATEL: A case study,” International strategic management review, vol. 3, no. 1–2, pp. 96–109, 2015.
[19] X. Xia, K. Govindan, and Q. Zhu, “Analyzing internal barriers for automotive parts remanufacturers in China using grey-DEMATEL approach,” Journal of cleaner production, vol. 87, pp. 811–825, 2015.
[20] A. Kumar and G. Dixit, “An analysis of barriers affecting the implementation of e-waste management practices in India: A novel ISM-DEMATEL approach,” Sustainable Production and Consumption, vol. 14, pp. 36–52, 2018.
[21] S. Luthra, K. Govindan, R. K. Kharb, and S. K. Mangla, “Evaluating the enablers in solar power developments in the current scenario using fuzzy DEMATEL: An Indian perspective,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 63, pp. 379–397, 2016.
[22] X. Zhou, Y. Shi, X. Deng, and Y. Deng, “D-DEMATEL: A new method to identify critical success factors in emergency management,” Safety science, vol. 91, pp. 93–104, 2017.
| Style | # |
|---|---|
| MLA | Muzafer Saracevic, Nan Wang, Elma Elfic Zukorlic, Suad Becirovic. "Assessment of Sintering Flue Gas Management Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methodology." American Journal of Business and Operations Research, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2020 ,PP. 84-92 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.010204) |
| APA | Muzafer Saracevic, Nan Wang, Elma Elfic Zukorlic, Suad Becirovic. (2020). Assessment of Sintering Flue Gas Management Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methodology. Journal of American Journal of Business and Operations Research, 1 ( 2 ), 84-92 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.010204) |
| Chicago | Muzafer Saracevic, Nan Wang, Elma Elfic Zukorlic, Suad Becirovic. "Assessment of Sintering Flue Gas Management Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methodology." Journal of American Journal of Business and Operations Research, 1 no. 2 (2020): 84-92 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.010204) |
| Harvard | Muzafer Saracevic, Nan Wang, Elma Elfic Zukorlic, Suad Becirovic. (2020). Assessment of Sintering Flue Gas Management Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methodology. Journal of American Journal of Business and Operations Research, 1 ( 2 ), 84-92 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.010204) |
| Vancouver | Muzafer Saracevic, Nan Wang, Elma Elfic Zukorlic, Suad Becirovic. Assessment of Sintering Flue Gas Management Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methodology. Journal of American Journal of Business and Operations Research, (2020); 1 ( 2 ): 84-92 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.010204) |
| IEEE | Muzafer Saracevic, Nan Wang, Elma Elfic Zukorlic, Suad Becirovic, Assessment of Sintering Flue Gas Management Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methodology, Journal of American Journal of Business and Operations Research, Vol. 1 , No. 2 , (2020) : 84-92 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.010204) |