1
Department of Decision support, Faculty of computers and Informatics, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt
(rehab_argawy@zu.edu.eg)
2
Department of Decision support, Faculty of computers and Informatics, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt
(mmsabe@zu.edu.eg)
Abstract :
Several research on the topic of supply chain resilience and sustainability have been done in recent years. However, they make clear that there are various points of view when it comes to the sustainability-resilience relationship. To adapt supply chains (SC) to the needs of contemporary manufacturing processes, new trends and approaches in environmental protection and social welfare have been put into place. Even though sustainability and resilience have each been extensively examined separately, there aren't many concepts that combine them to determine supply chain performance. Therefore, this study is displaying the aspects of supply chain resilience and how it may affect sustainability triple bottom line. Moreover, this study presents an extension of analytic hierarchy process (AHP), α-Discounting multi-criteria decision-making (α-D MCDM) to evaluate the resilience aspects in more consistent manner. This study proposes an idea of utilization of α-D MCDM in different manner to solve several supply chain evaluation issues.
Keywords :
Supply chain resilience; Supply chain sustainability; α-D MCDM;
References :
[1] Pettit, T. J., Croxton, K. L., & Fiksel, J. (2019). The evolution of resilience in supply chain management: a retrospective on ensuring supply chain resilience. Journal of Business Logistics, 40(1), 56-65.
[2] El Baz, J., & Ruel, S. (2021). Can supply chain risk management practices mitigate the disruption impacts on supply chains’ resilience and robustness? Evidence from an empirical survey in a COVID-19 outbreak era. International Journal of Production Economics, 233, 107972.
[3] Li, G., Xue, J., Li, N., & Ivanov, D. (2022). Blockchain-supported business model design, supply chain resilience, and firm performance. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 163, 102773.
[4] Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of cleaner production, 16(15), 1699-1710.
[5] Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M. C. (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. The international journal of logistics management, 20(1), 124-143.
[6] Vahidi, F., Torabi, S. A., & Ramezankhani, M. J. (2018). Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 1351-1365.
[7] Glas, A. H., Meyer, M. M., & Eßig, M. (2021). Covid-19 attacks the body of purchasing and supply management: a medical check of the immune system. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 27(4), 100716.
[8] Kern, D., Moser, R., Hartmann, E., & Moder, M. (2012). Supply risk management: model development and empirical analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management.
[9] Jiang, W., Sha, E. H. M., Zhuge, Q., & Wu, L. (2017). Efficient assignment algorithms to minimize operation cost for supply chain networks in agile manufacturing. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 108, 225-239.
[10] Kusi-Sarpong, S., Gupta, H., & Sarkis, J. (2019). A supply chain sustainability innovation framework and evaluation methodology. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 1990-2008.
[11] Patil, A., Dwivedi, A., & Moktadir, M. A. (2023). Big data-Industry 4.0 readiness factors for sustainable supply chain management: Towards circularity. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 109109.
[12] Cao, S., Johnson, H., & Tulloch, A. (2023). Exploring blockchain-based Traceability for Food Supply Chain Sustainability: Towards a Better Way of Sustainability Communication with Consumers. Procedia Computer Science, 217, 1437-1445.
[13] Li, Y., & Mathiyazhagan, K. (2018). Application of DEMATEL approach to identify the influential indicators towards sustainable supply chain adoption in the auto components manufacturing sector. Journal of cleaner production, 172, 2931-2941.
[14] Gupta, H., & Barua, M. K. (2017). Supplier selection among SMEs on the basis of their green innovation ability using BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS. Journal of Cleaner Production, 152, 242-258.
[15] Tariq, A., Badir, Y. F., Tariq, W., & Bhutta, U. S. (2017). Drivers and consequences of green product and process innovation: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future outlook. Technology in Society, 51, 8-23.
[16] Amore, M. D., & Bennedsen, M. (2016). Corporate governance and green innovation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 75, 54-72.
[17] Smarandache, F. (2010, July). α-discounting method for multi-criteria decision making (α-d MCDM). In 2010 13th International Conference on Information Fusion (pp. 1-7). IEEE.
[18] Smarandache, F. (2013, May). Interval alpha-discounting method for MCDC. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium of the Institute of Solid Mechanics and Session of the Commission of Acoustics (The XXIVth SISOM), Bucharest (pp. 27-32).
[19] Smarandache, F. (2013, September). Three non-linear α-Discounting MCDM-method examples. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Advanced Mechatronic Systems (pp. 174-176). IEEE.
| Style | # |
|---|---|
| MLA | Rehab Mohamed, Mahmoud Ismail. "Assessment of the relationship between sustainability and resilience in supply chain management using α-D MCDM." American Journal of Business and Operations Research, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2023 ,PP. 08-13 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.100201) |
| APA | Rehab Mohamed, Mahmoud Ismail. (2023). Assessment of the relationship between sustainability and resilience in supply chain management using α-D MCDM. Journal of American Journal of Business and Operations Research, 10 ( 2 ), 08-13 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.100201) |
| Chicago | Rehab Mohamed, Mahmoud Ismail. "Assessment of the relationship between sustainability and resilience in supply chain management using α-D MCDM." Journal of American Journal of Business and Operations Research, 10 no. 2 (2023): 08-13 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.100201) |
| Harvard | Rehab Mohamed, Mahmoud Ismail. (2023). Assessment of the relationship between sustainability and resilience in supply chain management using α-D MCDM. Journal of American Journal of Business and Operations Research, 10 ( 2 ), 08-13 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.100201) |
| Vancouver | Rehab Mohamed, Mahmoud Ismail. Assessment of the relationship between sustainability and resilience in supply chain management using α-D MCDM. Journal of American Journal of Business and Operations Research, (2023); 10 ( 2 ): 08-13 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.100201) |
| IEEE | Rehab Mohamed, Mahmoud Ismail, Assessment of the relationship between sustainability and resilience in supply chain management using α-D MCDM, Journal of American Journal of Business and Operations Research, Vol. 10 , No. 2 , (2023) : 08-13 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/AJBOR.100201) |