412 230
Full Length Article
Volume 7 , Issue 1, PP: 38-46 , 2020


A Short Remark on Vortex as Fluid Particle from Neutrosophic Logic perspective (Towards “fluidicle” or “vorticle” model of QED.)

Authors Names :   Victor Christianto   1 *     Florentin Smarandache   2  

1  Affiliation :  Malang Institute of Agriculture (IPM), Malang – INDONESIA

    Email :  victorchristianto@gmail.com

2  Affiliation :  Dept. Mathematics & Sciences, University of New Mexico, Gallup, USA

    Email :  smarand@unm.edu

Doi   :  10.5281/zenodo.3876241

Abstract :

In a previous paper in this journal (IJNS), it is mentioned about a possible approach to re-describe QED without renormalization route. As it is known that in literature, there are some attempts to reconcile vortex-based fluid dynamics and particle dynamics. Some attempts are not quite as fruitful as others. As a follow up to previous paper, the present paper will discuss two theorems for developing unification theories, and then point out some new proposals including by Simula (2020) on how to derive Maxwell equations in superfluid dynamics setting; this could be a new alternative approach towards “fluidicle” or “vorticle” model of QED. Further research is recommended in this new direction.

Keywords :

Neutrosophic logic , Vortex-based fluid dynamics , Fuidicle , Vorticle , QED , Renormalization , Maxwell-Proca equations.

References :

[1] Edouard B. Sonin, “Dynamics of quantised vortices in superfluids”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.

[2] Kerson Huang, “A superfluid Universe”,  Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., 2016.

[3] Fischer, U, ”Motion of quantized vortices as elementary objects”, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 278, pp.62-85,1999.

[4] Victor Christianto, Florentin Smarandache, Yunita Umniyati. A Derivation of Fluidic Maxwell-Proca Equations for Electrodynamics of Superconductors & Its Implication to Chiral Cosmology Model. Prespacetime J., Vol 9, No 7 (2018), url: https://prespacetime.com/index.php/pst/article/view/1471; see also [4a] V. Christianto, F. Smarandache & R.N. Boyd, Electron Model Based Helmholtz’s Electron Vortex & Kolmogorov’s Theory of Turbulence. Prespacetime J. vol. 10 (1), 2019. url: https://prespacetime.com/index.php/pst/article/view/1516


[5] F. Smarandache & V. Christianto,”Schrödinger Equation and the Quantization of Celestial Systems”, Prog. In Phys. Vol.2, April 2006. url: http://ptep-online.com/2006/PP-05-12.PDF 


[6] Siavash H. Sohrab,”Turbulence and quantum mechanics from cosmos to Planck Scale,” url: http://www.mech.northwestern.edu/web/people/faculty/sohrab.php


[7] T. Simula ,”Gravitational Vortex Mass in a Superfluid”, arXiv: 2001.03302 (2020), see in particular section D. Ampere–Maxwell-like law.


[8] Victor Christianto, Florentin Smarandache, Yunita Umniyati. Remark on Lehnert’s Revised Quantum Electrodynamics (RQED) as an Alternative to Francesco Celani’s et al’s Maxwell-Clifford equations: with an Outline of Chiral Cosmology model and its role to CMNS. JCMNS vol. 31 (Feb. 2020), Publication of ICMNS, http://www.iscmns.org


[9] Carl F. Krafft, “The Ether and Its vortices”,Copyright: Ken L. Wheeler, pp. 60-61, 2014.

[10] Bo Lehnert, “Mass-Radius Relations of Z and Higgs-like Bosons”, Progress in Physics, Vol. 10 Issue 1, pp. 5-7, 2014. http://ptep-online.com/2014/PP-36-02.PDF

[11] Bo Lehnert ,” A way to Revised Quantum Electrodynamics”, Progress in Physics, April 2012, Vol. 2, pp. 21-27. url: http://ptep-online.com/2012/PP-29-05.PDF

[12] Bo Lehnert,”Higgs-Like Particle due to Revised Quantum Electrodynamics”, Progress in Physics, Vol. 3, pp. 31-32, 2013. http://ptep-online.com/2013/PP-34-10.PDF

[13] Bo Lehnert, ”Potentialities of Revised Quantum Electrodynamics”, Progress in Physics, Vol. 4, pp. 48-52, 2013. http://ptep-online.com/2013/PP-35-07.PDF

[14] V. Christianto, R.N. Boyd & F. Smarandache,”Three Possible Applications of Neutrosophic Logic in Fundamental and Applied Sciences” International Journal of Neutrosophic Science, Vol. 1 no. 2, pp. 90-95, 2020.

[15] Jeff D. Eldredge, Tim Colonius, and Anthony Leonard, “A Vortex Particle Method for Two-Dimensional Compressible Flow”, Journal of Computational Physics 179, pp.371–399, 2002. doi:10.1006/jcph.2002.7060 

[16] Andrea Colagrossi, GIORGIO GRAZIANI AND MARIO PULVIRENTI., “Particles for fluids: SPH versus vortex methods”, Mathematics and Mechanics of Complex Systems 2(1):45-70, 2014. 

[17] Andrea Colagrossi, Emanuele Rossi & Salvatore Marrone. The Discrete Vortex Hydrodynamics method: similarities and differences with the SPH. 10th international SPHERIC workshop. Parma, Italy, June, pp.16-18, 2015

[18] O.S, Kotsur & G.A. Shcheglov,” VISCOUS FLUID SIMULATION WITH THE VORTEX ELEMENT METHOD”,31st Int. Council of. Aeoraut. Science, 2018. 

[19] Emanuele Rossi, Andrea Colagrossi, Benjamin Bouscasse and Giorgio Graziani,” Diffused Vortex hydrodynamics method”, Communications in Computational Physics 18(18 2), 351-379, 2015.


[21] Peter O’Malley,” Trajectories of Inertial Particles and Fluid Elements”, Haverford College, Haverford PA 19041. May 8th, 2008.

[22] William C. Daywitt,” The Anomalous Magnetic Moment of the Electron and Proton Cores According to the Planck Vacuum Theory”, EJERS, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING RESEARCH AND SCIENCE, VOL. 4, NO. 6, 2019.

[23] William C. Daywitt,” The Seven-Dimensional Spacetime in the Planck Vacuum Theory and the Structure of the Electron and Proton Cores”, EJERS, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING RESEARCH AND SCIENCE, VOL. 5, NO. 4, 2020

[24] William C. Daywitt,” The Fine Structure Constant and Radiative Corrections for the Electron and Positron Cores as Viewed in the Planck Vacuum Theory”, EJERS, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING RESEARCH AND SCIENCE, VOL. 5, NO. 5, MAY 2020