Volume 23 , Issue 4 , PP: 206-223, 2024 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article
M. Palanikumar 1 , Omaima alshanqiti 2 *
Doi: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.230416
This article presents a new way of analyzing multiple attribute decision-making (MADM) using (♭1, ♭2, ♭3) sin trigonometric complex neutrosophic sets (ST-CNS). Complex neutrosophic weighted averaging (ST-CNWA), sin trigonometric complex neutrosophic weighted geometric (ST-CNWG), sin trigonometric complex generalized neutrosophic weighted averaging (ST-CGNWA), and sin trigonometric complex generalized neutrosophic weighted geometric (ST-CGNWG). During our discussion, we presented an algorithm that utilized these operators. There are extensive numerical illustrations of score values. Furthermore, we will discuss commutativity, idempotency, and monotonicity of sin trigonometric complex neutrosophic sets as part of our discussion. It is easier, faster, and more convenient to find the best option this way. Consequently, the sin trigonometric complex (♭1, ♭2, ♭3) is more closely related to precise conclusions. Also revealed by the study was an intriguing and fascinating observation.
ST-CNWA , ST-CNWG , ST-CGNWA and ST-CGNWG.
[1] L. A. Ladeh, Fuzzy sets, Information and control, 8(3), (1965), 338-353.
[2] K. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy sets and Systems, 20(1), (1986), 87-96.
[3] R. R. Yager, Pythagorean membership values in multi criteria decision-making, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems, 22, (2014), 958-965.
[4] S. Ashraf, S. Abdullah, T. Mahmood, F. Ghani and T. Mahmood, Spherical fuzzy sets and their applications in multi-attribute decision making problems, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 36, (2019), 2829-284.
[5] B.C. Cuong and V. Kreinovich, Picture fuzzy sets a new concept for computational intelligence problems, in Proceedings of 2013 Third World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies (WICT 2013), IEEE, (2013), 1-6.
[6] P. Liu, G. Shahzadi, M. Akram, Specific types of picture fuzzy Yager aggregation operators for decisionmaking, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 13(1), (2020), 1072-1091.
[7] W.F. Liu, J. Chang, X. He, Generalized Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators and applications in decision making, Control Decis. 31, (2016), 2280-2286.
[8] X. Peng, and Y. Yang, Fundamental properties of interval valued Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, (2015), 1-44.
[9] K.G. Fatmaa, K. Cengiza, Spherical fuzzy sets and spherical fuzzy TOPSIS method, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 36(1), (2019), 337-352.
[10] M Palanikumar, K Arulmozhi, MCGDM based on TOPSIS and VIKOR using Pythagorean neutrosophic soft with aggregation operators, Neutrosophic Sets and Systems,, 538-555, 2022.
[11] M Palanikumar, S Broumi, Square root Diophantine neutrosophic normal interval-valued sets and their aggregated operators in application to multiple attribute decision making, International Journal of Neutrosophic Science, 4, 2022.
[12] M Palanikumar, K Arulmozhi, Novel possibility Pythagorean interval valued fuzzy soft set method for a decision making, TWMS J. App. and Eng. Math. V.13, N.1, 2023, pp. 327-340.
[13] S. Ashraf, S. Abdullah, T. Mahmood, Spherical fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and their application in group decision making problems, J. Amb. Intell. Hum. Comput. 11, (2020), 2731-2749.
[14] K. Ullah, H. Garg, T. Mahmood, N. Jan, Z. Ali, Correlation coefficients for T-spherical fuzzy sets and their applications in clustering and multi-attribute decision making, Soft Comput. 24, (2020), 1647-1659.
[15] K. Ullah, T. Mahmood, H. Garg, Evaluation of the performance of search and rescue robots using Tspherical fuzzy hamacher aggregation operators, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 22, (2020), 570-582.
[16] Tansu Temel, Salih Berkan Aydemir,Yasar Hoscan, Power Muirhead mean in spherical normal fuzzy environment and its applications to multi-attribute decision-making, Complex and Intelligent Systems, (2022), 1-19.
[17] X. D. Peng and J. Dai, Approaches to single-valued neutrosophic MADM based on MABAC, TOPSIS and new similarity measure with score function, Neural Computing and Applications, 29(10), (2018), 939-954.
[18] X. Zhang and L. Xu, Extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision-making with Diophantine Pythagorean fuzzy sets, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 29, (2014), 1061-1078.
[19] SG Quek, H Garg, G Selvachandran, K Arulmozhi,VIKOR and TOPSIS framework with a truthfuldistance measure for the (t, s)-regulated interval-valued neutrosophic soft set, Soft Computing, 1-27, 2023.
[20] M Palanikumar, K Arulmozhi, A Iampan, Multi criteria group decision making based on VIKOR and TOPSIS methods for Fermatean fuzzy soft with aggregation operators, ICICExpress Letters 16 (10), 1129–1138, 2022.
[21] M Palanikumar, K Arulmozhi, C. Jana, Multiple attribute decision-making approach for Pythagorean neutrosophic normal interval-valued fuzzy aggregation operators, Comput. Appl. Math., 41(90), (2022), 1-22.
