Volume 19 , Issue 1 , PP: 350-362, 2022 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article
S. Alvarez Hernandez 1 * , P. P. Jairo Mauricio 2 , L. Vázquez Maikel 3
Doi: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.190132
Social responsibility is the most important thing to consider while working on a project. When deciding on a project or taking part in a bid, it is crucial to understand the nature and potential consequences of the risks involved. Attempting to implement projects with cutting-edge technologies appears to be necessary, necessitating up-to-date and continuous planning to implement the relevant matters in light of the ever-increasing growth of urban communities, the need to carry out tasks, and the rising standard of living. Due to the strong demand, these strategies try to improve quality while decreasing prices. In the beginning, Smarandache suggests using neutrosophic sets. These sets are an improvement above traditional fuzzy set theory in reflecting the uncertainty and fuzziness of real-world issues. Three decision-making states are considered: uncertainty, truthiness, and falseness. The fuzzy set degree in Zadeh's classic theory is merely the membership function. On the other hand, three membership functions are considered in a neutrosophic setting. An indeterminacy degree is considered, which is not the case with intuitionistic fuzzy sets. To express decision makers' perspectives on the truthiness (T), falsity (F), and indeterminacy (I) for a fuzzy set concurrently, this paper expands the usual neutrosophic TOPSIS approach to interval-valued neutrosophic. One example of how the suggested strategy might be put to use is to prioritize initiatives in the realm of corporate social responsibility using a combination of expert opinion and objective criteria.
Social Personality , Neutrosophic Sets , MCDM , TOPSIS , Interval Valued. ,
[1] S. X. Zeng, H. Y. Ma, H. Lin, R. C. Zeng, and V. W. Y. Tam, “Social responsibility of major infrastructure projects in China,” International journal of project management, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 537–548, 2015.
[2] X. Lin, C. M. F. Ho, and G. Q. P. Shen, “Who should take the responsibility? Stakeholders’ power over social responsibility issues in construction projects,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 154, pp. 318–329, 2017.
[3] M. L. Pava and J. Krausz, “Criteria for evaluating the legitimacy of corporate social responsibility,” Journal of business ethics, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 337–347, 1997.
[4] K. Li, N. R. Khalili, and W. Cheng, “Corporate social responsibility practices in China: Trends, context, and impact on company performance,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 354, 2019.
[5] X. Lin, B. McKenna, C. M. F. Ho, and G. Q. P. Shen, “Stakeholders’ influence strategies on social responsibility implementation in construction projects,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 235, pp. 348–358, 2019.
[6] D. N. Berad, “Corporate social responsibility–issues and challenges in India,” Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, ISSN, pp. 1548–6583, 2011.
[7] X. Lin, C. M.-F. Ho, and G. Q. Shen, “For the balance of stakeholders’ power and responsibility: A collaborative framework for implementing social responsibility issues in construction projects,” Management Decision, 2018.
[8] J. M. Flórez-Parra, G. Rubio Martín, and C. Rapallo Serrano, “Corporate social responsibility and crowdfunding: The experience of the colectual platform in empowering economic and sustainable projects,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 13, p. 5251, 2020.
[9] M. Al‐Marri, A. H. Pinnington, M. Karatas‐Ozkan, and K. Nicolopoulou, “The management of corporate social responsibility through projects: a more economically developed country perspective,” Business Strategy & Development, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 358–371, 2019.
[10] E. A. Boadi, Z. He, D. F. Darko, and E. Abrokwah, "Unlocking from community stakeholders, corporate social responsibility (CSR) projects for the effective company–community relationship," Labor History, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 746–762, 2018.
[11] P. Biswas, S. Pramanik, and B. C. Giri, “Neutrosophic TOPSIS with group decision making,” in fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making using neutrosophic sets, Springer, 2019, pp. 543–585.
[12] R. M. Zulqarnain, X. L. Xin, M. Saeed, F. Smarandache, and N. Ahmad, Generalized neutrosophic TOPSIS to solve multi-criteria decision-making problems, vol. 38. Infinite Study, 2020.
[13] R. M. Zulqarnain, X. L. Xin, M. Saqlain, F. Smarandache, and M. I. Ahamad, “An integrated model of neutrosophic TOPSIS with application in multi-criteria decision-making problem,” Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, vol. 40, pp. 253–269, 2021.
[14] M. Akram and F. Smarandache, “Decision-making with bipolar neutrosophic TOPSIS and bipolar neutrosophic ELECTRE-I,” Axioms, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 33, 2018.
[15] E. Boltürk, “AS/RS technology selection using spherical fuzzy TOPSIS and neutrosophic TOPSIS,” in International Conference on Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2019, pp. 969–976.
[16] S. Nădăban and S. Dzitac, “Neutrosophic TOPSIS: a general view,” in 2016 6th International Conference on Computers Communications and Control (ICCCC), 2016, pp. 250–253.
[17] H. Sharma, A. Tandon, P. K. Kapur, and A. G. Aggarwal, “Ranking hotels using aspect ratings based sentiment classification and interval-valued neutrosophic TOPSIS,” International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 973–983, 2019.
[18] K. Mondal, S. Pramanik, and F. Smarandache, Rough neutrosophic TOPSIS for multi-attribute group decision making. Infinite Study, 2016.
[19] M. Saqlain, M. Saeed, M. R. Ahmad, and F. Smarandache, Generalization of TOPSIS for Neutrosophic Hypersoft set using Accuracy Function and its Application. Infinite Study, 2019.
[20] İ. Otay and C. Kahraman, “Six sigma project selection using interval neutrosophic TOPSIS,” in Advances in Fuzzy Logic and Technology 2017, Springer, 2017, pp. 83–93.
[21] H. Garg, "A novel divergence measure and its based TOPSIS method for multi-criteria decision-making under single-valued neutrosophic environment," Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 101–115, 2019.
[22] R. Şahin and M. Yiğider, "A Multi-criteria neutrosophic group decision-making method based TOPSIS for supplier selection," arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.5077, 2014.
[23] P. Biswas, S. Pramanik, and B. C. Giri, “TOPSIS method for multi-attribute group decision-making under single-valued neutrosophic environment,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 727–737, 2016.
[24] P. Chi and P. Liu, "An extended TOPSIS method for the multiple attribute decision-making problems based on interval neutrosophic set," Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 63–70, 2013.
[25] X. Peng and J. Dai, “Approaches to single-valued neutrosophic MADM based on MABAC, TOPSIS and new similarity measure with score function,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 939–954, 2018.
[26] A. Karaşan, C. Kahraman, and E. Boltürk, “Interval-valued neutrosophic EDAS method: an application to prioritization of social responsibility projects,” in Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-Making Using Neutrosophic Sets, Springer, 2019, pp. 455–485.
