Volume 5 , Issue 1 , PP: 01–12, 2026 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article
Andino Maseleno 1 * , Meinhaj Hussain 2 , Aygul Z. Ibatova 3
Doi: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJAIET.050101
Artificial intelligence is increasingly used to monitor learning processes in higher education; however, many analytics pipelines still terminate at prediction and provide limited support for instructional action. The research establishes an explainable artificial intelligence framework which utilizes digital learning environment behavioral data and contextual information to create customized instructional support solutions. The analysis uses xAPIEdu-Data dataset which contains 480 records to build engagement index and create support profiles and predict multiclass performance through rule based action allocation. The study tests three classification models using stratified cross validation. The study selects Random Forest as the most effective system because it delivers superior results across all tests. The selected model demonstrates 0.8021 accuracy and 0.8204 macro precision and 0.8010 macro recall and 0.8084 macro F1 score and 0.9140 macro area under the curve on the hold-out sample. The analysis shows that student absence and composite engagement index andgender and student guardian relationship and support profile and digital resource access arethe most important factors that determine student performance. The final decision layer manages student assignment to instructional support plans which contain attendance-first intervention and adaptive engagement support and family-engagement reinforcement and structured progression coaching and challenge-and-extend pathways. The study develops an analytical framework which connects explainable artificial intelligence to digital higher education instructional decision support systems.
Artificial intelligence in education , Learning analytics , Higher education , explainable AI , Educational technology , Student support
Alfredo, R., Echeverria, V., Jin, Y., Yan, L., Swiecki, Z., Gašević, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2024). Human-centred learning analytics and AI in education: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. caeai.2024.100215
Alalawi, K., Athauda, R., Chiong, R., & Renner, I. (2025a). Evaluating the student performance prediction and action framework through a learning analytics intervention study. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 2887–2916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12923-5
Alalawi, K., Athauda, R., & Chiong, R. (2025b). An extended learning analytics framework integratingmachine learning and pedagogical approaches for student performance prediction and intervention. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 35 (3), 1239–1287. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s40593-024-00429-7
AlGhamdi, R. (2024). Exploring the impact of ChatGPT-generated feedback on technical writing skills of computing students: A blinded study. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 18901–18926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12594-2
Bergdahl, N., Bond, M., Sjöberg, J., Dougherty, M., & Oxley, E. (2024). Unpacking student engagement in higher education learning analytics: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00493-y
Chiu, T. K. F., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. caeai.2022.100118
Deng, R., Jiang, M., Yu, X., Lu, Y., & Liu, S. (2025). Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Computers & Education, 227, Article105224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105224
Ghimire, S., Abdulla, S., Joseph, L. P., Prasad, S., Murphy, A., Devi, A., Barua, P. D., Deo, R. C., Acharya, R., & Yaseen, Z. M. (2024). Explainable artificial intelligence-machine learning models to estimate overall scores in tertiary preparatory general science course. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 100331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100331
Kim, J., Detrick, R., Yu, S., Song, Y., Bol, L., & Li, N. (2025). Socially shared regulation of learning and artificial intelligence: Opportunities to support socially shared regulation. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 11483–11521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13187-9
Kleimola, R., Hirsto, L., & Ruokamo, H. (2025). Promoting higher education students’ self-regulated learning through learning analytics: A qualitative study. Education and Information Technologies, 30 (4), 4959–4986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12978-4 Lee, D., Arnold, M., Srivastava, A., Plastow, K., Strelan, P., Ploeckl, F., Lekkas, D., & Palmer, E. (2024). The impact of generative AI on higher education learning and teaching: A study of educators’perspectives. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100221
Mumtaz, S., Carmichael, J., Weiss, M., & Nimon-Peters, A. (2025). Ethical use of artificial intelligence based tools in higher education: Are future business leaders ready? Education and Information Technologies, 30, 7293–7319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13099-8
Palanci, A., Yılmaz, R. M., & Turan, Z. (2024). Learning analytics in distance education: A systematic review study. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 22629–22650. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10639-024-12737-5
Pierrès, O., Darvishy, A., & Christen, M. (2025). Exploring the role of generative AI in higher education: Semi-structured interviews with students with disabilities. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 8923–8952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13134-8
Schmidt, D. A., Alboloushi, B., Thomas, A., & Magalhaes, R. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence in higher education: Perceptions, challenges, and strategies for academic innovation. Computers and Education Open, 9, Article 100274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100274