Journal of Cybersecurity and Information Management

Journal DOI

https://doi.org/10.54216/JCIM

Submit Your Paper

2690-6775ISSN (Online) 2769-7851ISSN (Print)

Volume 6 , Issue 2 , PP: 108-117, 2021 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article

An analytical approach for evaluating sustainable supply chain solutions during the COVID-19 pandemic: Benefits and better explanations

Mahmoud Ismail 1 * , Shereen Zaki 2 , Mahmoud Ibrahim 3 *

  • 1 Faculty of computers and Informatics, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt - (mmsabe@zu.edu.eg)
  • 2 Faculty of computers and Informatics, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt - (SZSoliman@fci.zu.edu.eg)
  • 3 Faculty of computers and Informatics, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt - (mmsba@zu.edu.eg)
  • Doi: https://doi.org/10.54216/JCIM.060204

    Received: February 14, 2021 Accepted: May 10, 2021
    Abstract

    The influence of COVID-19 has been felt in many facets of personal and professional life. As a result of the international economic crisis and the pandemic's consequences, major supply chains (SCs) have been disrupted. Our study intends to examine the effect of COVID-19 on SCs and help organizations choose options depending on their relative relevance. Phase one and phase two of the investigation are the most important. As a first step in strengthening SCs' ability to withstand the pandemic, Phase 2 examines the difficulties, concerns, actions, and solutions that have been encountered so far. As part of this phase, a MARCOS method is proposed to select solutions that address the complex interrelationships that are involved in decision-making. Positive and negative solutions are considered and it is at the start of the creation of a preliminary matrix, utility degree is determined closer to both solutions, a new method of determining utility functions and their aggregates is proposed, and the method is stable enough to take into account a huge list of conditions and alternatives. Using this approach, decision-makers will be able to more properly weigh the relevance and influence of many options before making a final choice. The findings suggest that SCs should continue to rely on innovation to endure potential competition and disasters.

    Keywords :

    COVID-19 , MARCOS , Supply Chain , SC Solutions , MCDM , Decision-making

    References

    [1] B. McKenzie and O. Economics, ―Beyond COVID-19: supply chain resilience holds key to recovery,‖ Retrieved, vol. 24, p. 2020, 2020.

    [2] S. Gupta and D. Ramachandran, ―Emerging market retail: transitioning from a product-centric to a customer-centric approach,‖ Journal of Retailing, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 597–620, 2021.

    [3] B. McCrea, ―Measuring COVID-19‘s Impact on the World‘s Supply Chains,‖ SourceToday. Avaialble from https://www. sourcetoday. com/supply-chain-trends/article/21126824/measuring-covid19s-impacton- the-worlds-supply-chains, 2020.

    [4] G. M. Magableh, ―Supply chains and the COVID‐ 19 pandemic: A comprehensive framework,‖ European Management Review, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 363–382, 2021.

    [5] M. M. Queiroz, D. Ivanov, A. Dolgui, and S. Fosso Wamba, ―Impacts of epidemic outbreaks on supply chains: mapping a research agenda amid the COVID-19 pandemic through a structured literature review,‖ Annals of operations research, pp. 1–38, 2020.

    [6] D. Ivanov and A. Dolgui, ―OR-methods for coping with the ripple effect in supply chains during COVID-19 pandemic: Managerial insights and research implications,‖ International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 232, p. 107921, 2021.

    [7] O. Battaïa, L. Benyoucef, X. Delorme, A. Dolgui, and S. Thevenin, ―Sustainable and energy efficient reconfigurable manufacturing systems,‖ in Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems: From Design to Implementation, Springer, 2020, pp. 179–191.

    [8] A. Dolgui, D. Ivanov, and B. Sokolov, ―Reconfigurable supply chain: The X-network,‖ International Journal of Production Research, vol. 58, no. 13, pp. 4138–4163, 2020.

    [9] D. Ivanov, ―Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives— lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic,‖ Annals of operations research, pp. 1–21, 2020.

    [10] S. Mehrotra, H. Rahimian, M. Barah, F. Luo, and K. Schantz, ―A model of supply‐ chain decisions for resource sharing with an application to ventilator allocation to combat COVID‐ 19,‖ Naval Research Logistics (NRL), vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 303–320, 2020.

    [11] F. Gao and X. Su, ―Online and offline information for omnichannel retailing,‖ Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 84–98, 2017.

    [12] T.-M. Choi, ―Innovative ‗bring-service-near-your-home‘ operations under Corona-virus (COVID- 19/SARS-CoV-2) outbreak: Can logistics become the messiah?,‖ Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 140, p. 101961, 2020.

    [13] D. Ivanov, ―Predicting the impacts of epidemic outbreaks on global supply chains: A simulation-based analysis on the coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2) case,‖ Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 136, p. 101922, 2020.

    [14] A. Shokrani, E. G. Loukaides, E. Elias, and A. J. G. Lunt, ―Exploration of alternative supply chains and distributed manufacturing in response to COVID-19; a case study of medical face shields,‖ Materials & design, vol. 192, p. 108749, 2020.

    [15] K. Iyengar, S. Bahl, R. Vaishya, and A. Vaish, ―Challenges and solutions in meeting up the urgent requirement of ventilators for COVID-19 patients,‖ Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 499–501, 2020.

    [16] V. H. Remko, ―Research opportunities for a more resilient post-COVID-19 supply chain–closing the gap between research findings and industry practice,‖ International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 341–355, 2020.

    [17] A. Sharma, A. Adhikary, and S. B. Borah, ―Covid-19′ s impact on supply chain decisions: Strategic insights from NASDAQ 100 firms using Twitter data,‖ Journal of Business Research, vol. 117, pp. 443– 449, 2020.

    [18] J. L. Cox and S. A. Koepsell, ―3D-printing to address COVID-19 testing supply shortages,‖ Laboratory Medicine, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. e45–e46, 2020.

    [19] R. Rajesh, ―A grey-layered ANP based decision support model for analyzing strategies of resilience in electronic supply chains,‖ Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 87, p. 103338, 2020.

    [20] A. Agarwal, R. Shankar, and M. K. Tiwari, ―Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: An ANP-based approach,‖ European journal of operational research, vol. 173, no. 1, pp. 211– 225, 2006.

    [21] S. M. Masoumik, S. H. Abdul-Rashid, and E. U. Olugu, ―The development of a strategic prioritisation method for green supply chain initiatives,‖ PloS one, vol. 10, no. 11, p. e0143115, 2015.

    [22] K. Moons, G. Waeyenbergh, L. Pintelon, P. Timmermans, and D. De Ridder, ―Performance indicator selection for operating room supply chains: An application of ANP,‖ Operations Research for Health Care, vol. 23, p. 100229, 2019.

    [23] C. Liu, Z. Niu, P.-C. Chang, and B. Zhang, ―Assessment approach to stage of lean transformation cycle based on fuzzy nearness degree and TOPSIS,‖ International Journal of Production Research, vol. 55, no. 23, pp. 7223–7235, 2017.

    [24] S. Vinodh and V. Swarnakar, ―Lean Six Sigma project selection using hybrid approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL–ANP–TOPSIS,‖ International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 2015.

    [25] S. Prasad, D. Khanduja, and S. K. Sharma, ―Integration of SWOT analysis with hybrid modified TOPSIS for the lean strategy evaluation,‖ Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, vol. 232, no. 7, pp. 1295–1309, 2018.

    [26] S. Zha, Y. Guo, S. Huang, and P. Tang, ―A Hybrid MCDM Approach Based on ANP and TOPSIS for Facility Layout Selection,‖ Transactions of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1027–1037, 2018.

    [27] K. Shahroudi and H. Rouydel, ―Using a multi-criteria decision making approach (ANP-TOPSIS) to evaluate suppliers in Iran‘s auto industry,‖ International Journal of Applied Operational Research-An Open Access Journal, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 0, 2012.

    [28] K.-L. Chang, S.-K. Liao, T.-W. Tseng, and C.-Y. Liao, ―An ANP based TOPSIS approach for Taiwanese service apartment location selection,‖ Asia Pacific Management Review, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 49–55, 2015.

    [29] I. Cahyadi, ―A Combined ANP, TOPSIS and MCGP Approach to Select Knowledge Transfer Strategy: A Case Study in Indonesian SMEs ERP System Implementation,‖ in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, vol. 505, no. 1, p. 12001.

    [30] C.-N. Liao, C.-H. Lin, and Y.-K. Fu, ―Integrative model for the selection of a new product launch strategy, based on ANP, TOPSIS and MCGP: a case study,‖ Technological and Economic Development of Economy, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 715–737, 2016.

    Cite This Article As :
    Ismail, Mahmoud. , Zaki, Shereen. , Ibrahim, Mahmoud. An analytical approach for evaluating sustainable supply chain solutions during the COVID-19 pandemic: Benefits and better explanations. Journal of Cybersecurity and Information Management, vol. , no. , 2021, pp. 108-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/JCIM.060204
    Ismail, M. Zaki, S. Ibrahim, M. (2021). An analytical approach for evaluating sustainable supply chain solutions during the COVID-19 pandemic: Benefits and better explanations. Journal of Cybersecurity and Information Management, (), 108-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/JCIM.060204
    Ismail, Mahmoud. Zaki, Shereen. Ibrahim, Mahmoud. An analytical approach for evaluating sustainable supply chain solutions during the COVID-19 pandemic: Benefits and better explanations. Journal of Cybersecurity and Information Management , no. (2021): 108-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/JCIM.060204
    Ismail, M. , Zaki, S. , Ibrahim, M. (2021) . An analytical approach for evaluating sustainable supply chain solutions during the COVID-19 pandemic: Benefits and better explanations. Journal of Cybersecurity and Information Management , () , 108-117 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/JCIM.060204
    Ismail M. , Zaki S. , Ibrahim M. [2021]. An analytical approach for evaluating sustainable supply chain solutions during the COVID-19 pandemic: Benefits and better explanations. Journal of Cybersecurity and Information Management. (): 108-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/JCIM.060204
    Ismail, M. Zaki, S. Ibrahim, M. "An analytical approach for evaluating sustainable supply chain solutions during the COVID-19 pandemic: Benefits and better explanations," Journal of Cybersecurity and Information Management, vol. , no. , pp. 108-117, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/JCIM.060204