International Journal of Private Law and International Arbitration
Journal DOI
2836-5216ISSN (Online)
Volume 1 , Issue 1 , PP: 08-19, 2022 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article
Mahir Al Banna 1 *
Doi: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJPLIA.010101
The legal status of the Chagos archipelago is complex because it is of a hybrid nature: it is under the sovereignty of the United Kingdom which grants rights at sea to Mauritius, and on land to the United States (Diego Garcia). This case is also important because it is not easy to have two divergent preoccupations: the protection of the environment in the face of the rights of Chagossians and environmental sustainability in the face of equity and human rights. This case was first submitted to the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA), before the UN General Assembly had asked the International Court of Justice (ICJ) about the claims that the PCA declared it lacked jurisdiction to answer.
Archipel des Chagos , UK , Mauritius , International Court of Justice , Arbitration , Self-dé , termination , State Consent.
1.Books
[1] 1.Conforti, B., The Law and Practice of the United Nations (The Hague/London: Kluwer International
Law, 2000).
[2] 2.Lauterpacht, H., The Development of International Law by the International Court (London: Stevens
and Sons, 1958).
[3] 3. Allen, Stephen., The Chagos Islanders and International Law, Oxford, Hart, 2014
[4] 4. Vine, D., Island of Shame, Princeton-Oxford, Princeton University Press, 2009. 288. (BOOK)
2. Articles
[1] Oraison, A., „Radioscopie de la base militaire de Diego Garcia après le renouvellement pour 20
ans, le 30 décembre 2016, du bail stratégique consenti aux États-Unis par la Grande-Bretagne‟,
R.J.O.I. 2018 – n° 25 25-96
[2] Oraison, A., “La genèse de la base militaire américaine installée aux Iles Chagos, (2002-2003) 3
Revue juridique de l‟océan indien 304-314.
[3] Reghizzi, Z., « La juridiction consultative a l‟épreuve du principe consensuel : l‟affaire des Effets
juridiques de la separation de l‟archipel des Chagos de Maurice en 1965 » Questions of
International Law (QIL), Zoom-out 55 (2018) 1 15-
[4] Goodrich, L., “The Nature of the Advisory Opinions of the Permanent Court of International
Justice”, 32 AJIL. 1938, 738-758
[5] Conforti, B., “Observations on the Advisory Function of the International Court of Justice” in:
Antonio Cassese (ED.), “UN Lawful/Fundamental Rights: Two Topics in International Law
(Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff and Noordohff, 1979)
[6] Aljaghoub, M.,“The Absence of State Consent to Advisory Opinions in the International Court of
Justice: Judicial and Political Restraints”, (2010) 24 Arab Law Quaterly 191-207.
[7] Biad, A., Edynak, E., L‟arbitrage relatif à l‟aire marine protégée des Chagos (Maurice c.
Royaume-Uni) du 18 mars 2015 : une décision prudente pour un litige complexe, Revue
québécoise de droit international, 29, novembre 2016, 55-83, 58.
[8] Sarwankumar, R., « The Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice on Chagos: a
critical overview”, African Human Rights Yearbook (2019) 3 414-434
3. Websites
[1] Twyman-Ghoshal, A., How the US and the UK worked together to recolonize the Chagos Islands and
evict Chagossians, The Conversation. Published : February 24, 2022https://theconversation.com/howthe-
us-and-uk-worked-together-to-recolonise-the-chagos-islands-and-evict-chagossians-177636
Accessed on 22/6/2022.
[2] Oraison, A., La CIJ condamne le Royaume-Uni dans l‟affaire des Chagos, Temoignage, 27/2/ 2019.
https://www.temoignages.re/politique/sciences-politiques/la-cour-internationale-de-justice-condamnele-
royaume-uni-dans-l-affaire-des-chagos,95082 Accessed on 13/5/2011.
[3] Kastelli, E., The Chagos : UK refusal to hand back archipelago disregards international law and
echoes era of colonialism. The Conversation. Published: June 11 2019.
https://theconversation.com/chagos-islands-uk-refusal-to-hand-back--archipelago--disregardsinternational-
law-and-echoes-era-of-colonialism-118290 Accessed on 21/6/2022
[4] Samaranyake, N.,« The Chagos Archipelago Dispute: International Law, Diplomacy and Military
Basing. Lawfare, October 6, 2020The Chagos Archipelago Dispute: Law, Diplomacy and Military
Basing - Lawfare (lawfareblog.com). Accessed on 6/5/2022
[5] Seibt, S., Les iles Chagos, symbole du lent déclin de l‟Empire colonial britannique
http://www.france24.com/fr/20190522-iles-chagos-archipel- -britannique-contestation-onu-baseamericaine.
Publie le 22/5/2019. Accessed on 22/6/2022
[6] 34,.Questions of International Law www.qil-qdi.0rg/la-juridiction-consultative-a-lepreuve-du-principeconsensuel-
laffaire-des-effets-juridiques-de-la-separation-de-larchipel-des-chagos Accessed on
25/6/2022/.
[7] Delcroix, M., Chagos: ces iles sacrifiées sur l‟autel d‟un accord stratégique. RFI, 7/8/2020.
https://www.rfi.fr/fr/europe/20200807-chagos-%C3%AEles-sacrifi%C3%A9es-autel-accordstratégique-
maurice-royaume-uni Accessed on 4/6/2022.
[8] Akande, D., Tzanakopoulos, A., „Can the International Court of Justice Decide on the Chagos Islands
Advisory Proceedings without the UJ‟s Consent?‟EJIL: Talk! (27juin 2017) www.ejiltalk.org/can-theinternational-
court-of-justice-decide-on-the-chagos-islands-proceedings-without-uks-consent/ Accessed
on 20/6/2022.
[9] McKenna, M., Chagos Islands: UK refusal to return archipelago to Mauritius shows the limits of
international law. Published on November 26, 2019. Chagos Islands: UK refusal to return archipelago
to Mauritius show the limits of international law (theconversation.com). Accessed on 9/7/2022.
