Volume 4 , Issue 2 , PP: 11–18, 2025 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article
Nahla Moussa 1 * , Low Hon Loon Alfred 2
Student-success analytics has moved from experimental prediction toward an institutional capability for reducing attrition, allocating support resources, and improving digital learning governance. This paper develops a business oriented early-warning model for education technology environments in which predictive performance, interpretability, intervention priority, and governance are treated as joint design requirements. The study uses a public student-success dataset from a higher education institution and evaluates decisive outcome prediction for dropout and graduation, while preserving a wider discussion of the enrolled group as an unresolved operational state. The proposed model combines a transparent predictive layer, a risk-to-action prioritization layer, and a governance layer that restricts how predictions are translated into student support decisions. The results show that a parsimonious logistic specification can provide competitive performance compared with more complex tree based models, while producing clearer accountability for academic advising and digital student-success units. The discussion argues that student-success technology should not be judged by accuracy alone, but by whether the analytics pipeline produces timely, explainable, privacy-aware, and operationally usable support signals.
Education technology , Student success , Learning analytics , Dropout prediction , Early-warning systems , Higher education , Predictive governance
[1] V. Realinho, M. Vieira Martins, J. Machado, and L. Baptista, “Predict Students’ Dropout and Academic Success,” UCI Machine Learning Repository, 2021, doi: 10.24432/C5MC89.
[2] V. Realinho, J. Machado, L. Baptista, and M. V. Martins, “Predicting student dropout and academic success,” Data, Int. J. of AI and Education Technology (IJAIET) Vol. 04, No. 02, PP. 11–18, 2025
[3] D. Ifenthaler and J. Y.-K. Yau, “Utilising learning analytics to support study success in higher education: A systematic review,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 1961–1990, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11423-020-09788-z.
[4] A. Atif, D. Richards, D. Liu, and A. A. Bilgin, “Perceived benefits and barriers of a prototype early alert system to detect engagement and support at-risk students: The teacher perspective,” Computers & Education, vol. 156, p. 103954, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103954.
[5] J. Knobbout and E. Van Der Stappen, “Where is the learning in learning analytics? A systematic literature review on the operationalization of learning-related constructs in the evaluation of learning analytics interventions,” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 631–645, 2020, doi: 10.1109/TLT.2020.2999970.
[6] M. Afzaal, J. Nouri, A. Zia, P. Papapetrou, U. Fors, Y.Wu, X. Li, and R.Weegar, “Explainable AI for data driven feedback and intelligent action recommendations to support students self-regulation,” Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4, p. 723447, 2021, doi: 10.3389/frai.2021.723447.
[7] D. Al-Shaikhli, L. Jin, A. Porter, and A. Tarczynski, “Visualizing weekly learning outcomes and the intention to continue using a learning management system: The role of cognitive absorption and perceived learning self regulation,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 2909–2937, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10639 021-10703-z.
[8] R. Jayashanka, E. Hettiarachchi, and K. P. Hewagamage, “Technology enhanced learning analytics dashboard in higher education,” The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 151–170, 2022, doi: 10.34190/ejel.20.2.2189.
[9] F. G. Karaoglan Yilmaz, “The effect of learning analytics assisted recommendations and guidance feedback on students’ metacognitive awareness and academic achievements,” Journal of Computing in Higher Education, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 396–415, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s12528-021-09304-z.
[10] F. G. Karaoglan Yilmaz, “Utilizing learning analytics to support students’ academic self-efficacy and problem-solving skills,” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 175–191, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s40299-020-00548-4.
[11] F. G. Karaoglan Yilmaz and R. Yilmaz, “Learning analytics intervention improves students’ engagement in online learning,” Technology, Knowledge and Learning, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 449–460, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10758 021-09547-w.
[12] T. K. Tan and L. Samavedham, “The learning process matters: A sequence analysis perspective of examining procrastination using learning management system,” Computers and Education Open, vol. 3, p. 100112, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100112.
[13] H. Lu, K. Huang, and T. E. Johnson, “The effects of different interventions on self-regulated learning of preservice teachers in a blended academic course,” Computers & Education, vol. 181, p. 104442, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104442.
[14] S. Kim, E. Choi, Y.-K. Jun, and S. Lee, “Student dropout prediction for university with high precision and recall,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 10, p. 6275, 2023, doi: 10.3390/app13106275.
[15] M. Francis, M. Avoseh, K. Card, L. Newland, and K. Streff, “Student privacy and learning analytics: Investigating the application of privacy within a student success information system in higher education,” Journal of Learning Analytics, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 102–114, 2023, doi: 10.18608/jla.2023.7975.
[16] M. Mukred, U. A. Mokhtar, B. Hawash, H. AlSalman, andM. Zohaib, “The adoption and use of learning analytics tools to improve decision making in higher learning institutions: An extension of technology acceptancemodel,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 4, p. e26315, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26315.
[17] Z. Pan, L. Biegley, A. Taylor, and H. Zheng, “A systematic review of learning analytics: Incorporated instructional interventions on learning management systems,” Journal of Learning Analytics, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 52–72, 2024, doi: 10.18608/jla.2023.8093.
[18] M. Vaarma and H. Li, “Predicting student dropouts with machine learning: An empirical study in Finnish higher education,” Technology in Society, vol. 76, p. 102474, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102474.
[19] A. Villar and C. R. V. de Andrade, “Supervised machine learning algorithms for predicting student dropout and academic success: A comparative study,” Discover Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4, p. 2, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s44163-023- 00079-z.
[20] O. Goren, L. Cohen, and A. Rubinstein, “Early prediction of student dropout in higher education using machinelearning models,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, 2024, pp. 349–359, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12729834.
[21] M. A. Hassan, A. H. Muse, and S. Nadarajah, “Predicting student dropout rates using supervised machine learning: Insights from the 2022 National Education Accessibility Survey in Somaliland,” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 17, p. 7593, 2024, doi: 10.3390/app14177593