2690-6791ISSN (Online)
2769-786XISSN (Print)
Volume 9 , Issue 2 , PP: 23-35, 2023 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article
Alber S. Aziz 1 , Moahmed Emad 2 * , Mahmoud Ismail 3 , Heba Rashad 4 , Ahmed M. Ali 5 , Ahmed Abdelhafeez 6 , Shimaa S. Mohamed 7
Doi: https://doi.org/10.54216/JISIoT.090202
For businesses that depend on reliable and secure IT systems, choosing the best location for a data center is of paramount importance. Data center accessibility, operational efficiency, cost, and security are all affected by their physical location. The procedure entails considering a wide range of elements to guarantee that the final site meets the needs of the business. This paper investigated the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model to select the best data center location based on a set of criteria. The MCDM method is integrated with the single-valued neutrosophic set (SVNS) to deal with vague and inaccurate information. A neutrosophic set with truth, indeterminacy, and falsity membership functions all in the range [0, 1] is called a SVNS. This paper used SVNS with three MCDM methods such as entropy, TOPSIS, and MABAC techniques. The entropy technique is used to compute the weights of criteria, then the TOPSIS and MABAC methods are used to rank the locations. The case study is investigated in Egypt. This paper used ten criteria and eight alternatives.
Neutrosophic Set , Data Centers , Optimal Location , MCDM , TOPSIS , MABAC , Entropy.
[1] B. Jaumard, A. Shaikh, and C. Develder, “Selecting the best locations for data centers in resilient optical grid/cloud dimensioning,” in 2012 14th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON), IEEE, 2012, pp. 1–4.
[2] M. H. Sayadnavard, A. T. Haghighat, and A. M. Rahmani, “A multi-objective approach for energy-efficient and reliable dynamic VM consolidation in cloud data centers,” Eng. Sci. Technol. an Int. J., vol. 26, p. 100995, 2022.
[3] Y. Zhang, K. Shan, X. Li, H. Li, and S. Wang, “Research and Technologies for next-generation high-temperature data centers–State-of-the-arts and future perspectives,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 171, p. 112991, 2023.
[4] K. Malathi and K. Priyadarsini, “Hybrid lion–GA optimization algorithm-based task scheduling approach in cloud computing,” Appl. Nanosci., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 2601–2610, 2023.
[5] S.-H. Lee and J.-W. Park, “Selection of optimal location and size of multiple distributed generations by using Kalman filter algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1393–1400, 2009.
[6] M.-S. Kuo, “Optimal location selection for an international distribution center by using a new hybrid method,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 7208–7221, 2011.
[7] A. R. Bakhshi Lomer et al., “Optimizing emergency shelter selection in earthquakes using a risk-driven large group decision-making support system,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 5, p. 4019, 2023.
[8] K. Balaji, P. Sai Kiran, and M. Sunil Kumar, “Power aware virtual machine placement in IaaS cloud using discrete firefly algorithm,” Appl. Nanosci., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 2003–2011, 2023.
[9] H. Rong, H. Zhang, S. Xiao, C. Li, and C. Hu, “Optimizing energy consumption for data centers,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 58, pp. 674–691, 2016.
[10] M. Mena, I. T. J. Musilli, I. T. E. Austin, J. Lee, and P. Vaccaro, “Selecting a data center site: Intel’s Approach,” Intel (white Pap. Intel IT, Intel Corp., 2014.
[11] Z. Mohamed, M. M. Ismail, and A. F. Abd El-Gawad, “Neutrosophic Model to Examine the Challenges Faced by Manufacturing Businesses in Adopting Green Supply Chain Practices and to Provide Potential Solutions,” Neutrosophic Systems With Applications, vol. 3, pp. 45–52, 2023.
[12] D. Xu, H. Xian, X. Cui, and Y. Hong, A new single-valued neutrosophic distance for TOPSIS, MABAC and new similarity measure in multi-attribute decision-Making. Infinite Study, 2020.
[13] Y. Sun and Y. Cai, “A flexible decision-making method for green supplier selection integrating TOPSIS and GRA under the single-valued neutrosophic environment,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 83025–83040, 2021.
[14] H. Xian and D. Xu, “A New Single-valued Neutrosophic Distance for MABAC, TOPSIS and New Similarity Measure in Multi-attribute Decision-Making,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Computationand Information Sciences (ICCIS 2019), Chengdu, China, 2019, pp. 681–688.
[15] S. Zeng, D. Luo, C. Zhang, and X. Li, “A correlation-based TOPSIS method for multiple attribute decision making with single-valued neutrosophic information,” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak., vol. 19, no. 01, pp. 343–358, 2020.
[16] W. Ye, J. Geng, X. Cui, and D. Xu, “A New Method for Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Based on Single-Valued Neutrosophic Sets.,” Eng. Lett., vol. 28, no. 4, 2020.
[17] D. Zhang, M. Zhao, G. Wei, and X. Chen, “Single-valued neutrosophic TODIM method based on cumulative prospect theory for multi-attribute group decision making and its application to medical emergency management evaluation,” Econ. Res. istraživanja, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 4520–4536, 2022.
[18] A. Sleem, N. Mostafa, and I. Elhenawy, “Neutrosophic CRITIC MCDM Methodology for Ranking Factors and Needs of Customers in Product’s Target Demographic in Virtual Reality Metaverse,” Neutrosophic Systems With Applications, vol. 2, pp. 55–65, 2023.
[19] X. Peng and J. Dai, “Approaches to single-valued neutrosophic MADM based on MABAC, TOPSIS and new similarity measure with score function,” Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 29, pp. 939–954, 2018.
[20] H. Ran, “MABAC method for multiple attribute group decision making under single-valued neutrosophic sets and applications to performance evaluation of sustainable microfinance groups lending,” PLoS One, vol. 18, no. 1, p. e0280239, 2023.
[21] G. N. Güğül, F. Gökçül, and U. Eicker, “Sustainability analysis of zero energy consumption data centers with free cooling, waste heat reuse and renewable energy systems: A feasibility study,” Energy, vol. 262, p. 125495, 2023.
[22] A. Javadpour et al., “An energy-optimized embedded load balancing using DVFS computing in cloud data centers,” Comput. Commun., vol. 197, pp. 255–266, 2023.
[23] A. Hammadi and L. Mhamdi, “A survey on architectures and energy efficiency in Data Center Networks,” Comput. Commun., vol. 40, pp. 1–21, 2014.
[24] A. R. Yeruva, “Monitoring Data Center Site Infrastructure Using AIOPS Architecture,” Eduvest-Journal Univers. Stud., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 265–277, 2023.
[25] H. Pi-Fang, “Applying the ANP model for selecting the optimal location for an international business office center in China,” Asia Pacific Manag. Rev., vol. 15, no. 1, 2010.
[26] Q. Tang, S. K. S. Gupta, and G. Varsamopoulos, “Energy-efficient thermal-aware task scheduling for homogeneous high-performance computing data centers: A cyber-physical approach,” IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1458–1472, 2008.
[27] A. Saha, D. Pamucar, O. F. Gorcun, and A. R. Mishra, “Warehouse site selection for the automotive industry using a fermatean fuzzy-based decision-making approach,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 211, p. 118497, 2023.
[28] Ş. Emeç and G. Akkaya, “A stochastic multi-criteria decision-making analysis for a warehouse location selection problem: a case study,” Int. J. Res., vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 133–143, 2019.
[29] F. SEZER, B. Özkan, and P. GÜROL, “Hazardous materials warehouse selection as a multiple criteria decision making problem,” J. Econ. Bibliogr., vol. 3, no. 1S, pp. 63–73, 2016.
[30] T. Demirel, N. Ç. Demirel, and C. Kahraman, “Multi-criteria warehouse location selection using Choquet integral,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 3943–3952, 2010.
[31] S. Y. Roh, Y. R. Shin, and Y. J. Seo, “The Pre-positioned warehouse location selection for international humanitarian relief logistics,” Asian J. Shipp. Logist., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 297–307, 2018.
[32] T. T. Yaman, “Pythagorean fuzzy Analytical Network Process (ANP) and its application to warehouse location selection problem,” in 2020 15th Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), IEEE, 2020, pp. 137–140.
[33] A. T. Işık and E. A. Adalı, “The decision-making approach based on the combination of entropy and ROV methods for the apple selection problem,” Eur. J. Interdiscip. Stud., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 80–86, 2017.
[34] C.-H. Chen, “A novel multi-criteria decision-making model for building material supplier selection based on entropy-AHP weighted TOPSIS,” Entropy, vol. 22, no. 2, p. 259, 2020.
[35] M. Şahin, “A comprehensive analysis of weighting and multicriteria methods in the context of sustainable energy,” Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1591–1616, 2021.
[36] P. Biswas, S. Pramanik, and B. C. Giri, “TOPSIS method for multi-attribute group decision-making under single-valued neutrosophic environment,” Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 27, pp. 727–737, 2016.
[37] J. Ye, “A multicriteria decision-making method using aggregation operators for simplified neutrosophic sets,” J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 2459–2466, 2014.
[38] N. Rahim, L. Abdullah, and B. Yusoff, “A border approximation area approach considering bipolar neutrosophic linguistic variable for sustainable energy selection,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 10, p. 3971, 2020.
[39] A. Alinezhad and J. Khalili, New methods and applications in multiple attribute decision making (MADM), vol. 277. Springer, 2019.
