Galoitica: Journal of Mathematical Structures and Applications
Journal DOI
2834-5568ISSN (Online)
Volume 12 , Issue 2 , PP: 40-50, 2025 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article
Zahraa Ahmed Sahib 1 * , Najmeh Malek Mohammadi 2
Doi: https://doi.org/10.54216/GJMSA.120203
This study focuses on the development of efficient numerical algorithms for solving nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs). The research integrates theoretical analysis and practical numerical experiments to address the challenges posed by nonlinear PDEs, which often lack closed-form solutions and exhibit sensitivity to initial and boundary conditions. Benchmark models such as Burgers’ Equation, the Korteweg–de Vries (KdV) Equation, and the Navier–Stokes Equations are highlighted due to their significance in physical and engineering applications. Traditional numerical methods—Finite Difference Method (FDM), Finite Element Method (FEM), and Finite Volume Method (FVM)—are reviewed with respect to accuracy, stability, and computational efficiency. Numerical stability concepts, including Von Neumann analysis and the CFL condition, are discussed alongside sources of error and strategies for error reduction. New algorithms were proposed by enhancing traditional schemes, incorporating adaptive mesh refinement, and integrating stability techniques. Numerical experiments on benchmark problems demonstrated improved accuracy, enhanced stability in handling nonlinear terms, and acceptable computational efficiency. The findings emphasize the importance of selecting suitable numerical methods, conducting stability analysis, and applying adaptive techniques. The study recommends higher-order schemes, conservative formulations for fluid dynamics, and double precision when necessary, ensuring reliable and reproducible computational results.
Nonlinear PDEs , Numerical Algorithm , Finite Difference , Finite Element , Stability Analysis , Computational Mathematics
[1] R. Alsharif, M. A. Alsharif, and F. A. Alzahrani, “A comparative study of numerical methods for solving nonlinear partial differential equations,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 392, p. 125661, 2021.
[2] S. Kumar, R. Kumar, M. S. Osman, and B. Samet, “A wavelet-based numerical scheme for fractional-order SEIR epidemic of measles using Genocchi polynomials,” Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 1250–1268, 2021.
[3] L. Zada and I. Aziz, “Numerical solution of fractional partial differential equations via Haar wavelet,” Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 222–242, 2022.
[4] S. L. Brunton and J. N. Kutz, “Promising directions of machine learning for partial differential equations,” Nature Computational Science, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 483–494, 2024.
[5] S. Kumar, S. Ghosh, R. Kumar, and M. Jleli, “A fractional model for population dynamics of two interacting species using spectral and Hermite wavelet methods,” Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 1652–1672, 2021.
[6] V. K. Verma and S. Mondal, “A brief review of numerical methods for heat and mass transfer of Casson fluids,” Partial Differential Equations in Applied Mathematics, vol. 3, p. 100034, 2021.
[7] K. Vuik, F. Vermolen, M. van Gijzen, and T. Vuik, Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations. Delft, The Netherlands: TU Delft Open Publishing, 2023.
[8] Z. Sabir, M. A. Z. Raja, H. A. Wahab, M. Shoaib, and J. F. G. Aguilar, “Integrated neuro-evolution heuristic with sequential quadratic programming for second-order prediction differential models,” Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, vol. 40, no. 1, p. e22692, 2024.
[9] F. Mirzaee and N. Samadyar, “Implicit meshless method for solving a two-dimensional fractional stochastic Tricomi-type equation on irregular domains in fractal transonic flow,” Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 1781–1799, 2021.
[10] V. Dwivedi, N. Parashar, and B. Srinivasan, “Distributed learning machines for solving forward and inverse problems in partial differential equations,” Neurocomputing, vol. 420, pp. 299–316, 2021.
[11] G. Delic, Guide to Numerical Algorithm Design and Development. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.12345
[12] J. Bai, G.-R. Liu, A. Gupta, L. Alzubaidi, X.-Q. Feng, and Y. Gu, “Physics-informed radial basis network (PIRBN): A local approximating neural network for solving nonlinear partial differential equations,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 415, p. 116290, 2023.
[13] Z. Mao and X. Meng, “Physics-informed neural networks with residual- and gradient-based adaptive sampling for solving partial differential equations with sharp solutions,” Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 1069–1084, 2023.
[14] J. van Kan, G. Segal, and F. Vermolen, Numerical Methods in Scientific Computing. Delft, The Netherlands: TU Delft Open Publishing, 2023.
[15] S. Jin, N. Liu, and Y. Yu, “Quantum simulation of partial differential equations: Applications and detailed analysis,” Physical Review A, vol. 108, no. 3, p. 032603, 2023.
