2036 944
Full Length Article
International Journal of BIM and Engineering Science
Volume 1 , Issue 1, PP: 20-41 , 2018 | Cite this article as | XML |PDF

Title

BIM Performance Improvement Framework for Syrian AEC Companies

  Sonia Ahmed 1 * ,   Petr DlasK 2 ,   Omar Selim 3 ,   Ashraf Elhendawi 4

1  Czech Technical University, Czech Republic
    (sonia@BIMarabia.com)

2  Czech Technical University, Czech Republic
    (dlask@fsv.cvut.cz)

3  BIMarabia London, UK
    (omar.selm@gmail.com)

4  Edinburgh Napier University, UK
    (ashrafelhendawi@yahoo.com)


Doi   :   https://doi.org/10.54216/IJBES.010102


Abstract :

The Architectural, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry projects in Syria struggled with myriad problems. However, Building Information Modelling (BIM) technology worldwide proves its capability to solve these issues, Syrian AEC companies are rarely using BIM. Therefore, the aim of this study is to improve the BIM performance in Syrian AEC companies which are already in the BIM zero level and to provide strategies to the companies which do not use BIM for BIM adoption in their projects. An extensive literature review has been conducted to investigate the latest strategies and frameworks to implement and improve BIM performance. In addition to, an online questionnaire analysed by SPSS software and Excel to develop the suggested framework. Furthermore, the General Company for Engineering Studies and Consultations (GCEC) is selected as a case study to validate the framework. This study assessed and enabled the company to improve its BIM performance by using BIM maturity matrix (BIM3) through three stages: 1) Identified BIM and its performance, 2) Performance measurement, 3) Performance improvement. This study provides a new and novel companies’ BIM performance improvement framework which consisted of three fields: policy, process, and technology. The results of this study assisted to identify, obtain, and improve BIM interactions between individuals and companies to enhance the collaboration between all project participants. The future research will attempt to test and validate the proposed framework for private sector companies.

Keywords :

BIM Maturity; AEC; Syria; Performance Improvement; Policy; Process; Technology

References :

[1]          Ahmed, S., Dlask, P. and Hasan, B., 2014. Deviation in the cost of projects. In Construction Macroeconomics Conference.

[2]          Ahmed, S., Dlask, P., Shaban, M. and Selim, O., 2018. The possibility of Applying BIM in Syrian Building Projects. Engineering for Rural Development. Jelgava.

[3]          Amaratunga, D. and Baldry, D., 2002. Moving from performance measurement to performance management. Facilities, 20(5/6), pp.217-223. 

[4]          Autodesk (2018). What Is BIM | Building Information Modeling | Autodesk? [online] Autodesk.com. Available at: https://www.autodesk.com/solutions/bim [Accessed 6 Jul. 2018].

[5]          Bouška, R. 2016, "Evaluation of Maturity of BIM Tools across Different Software Platforms", Procedia Engineering, pp. 481

[6]          Doumbouya, L. et al. 2016. Adoption of the Building Information Modeling (BIM) for Construction Project Effectiveness: The Review of BIM Benefits. American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2016, pp. 74-79. 

[7]          Elhendawi, A.I. (2018) “Methodology for BIM Implementation in KSA in AEC Industry.” School of Engineering and the Built Environment, Edinburgh Napier University, UK.

[8]          Gao, J., 2011. A characterization framework to document and compare BIM implementations on construction projects(Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University).

[9]          Hasan, B., Jrad, F. and Ahmed, S., 2010 Study the causes of formal change orders and analyze their impact on building projects: the case of Syria.

[10]       Jung, Y. and Joo, M., 2011. Building information modeling (BIM) framework for practical implementation. Automation in construction, 20(2), pp.126-133.

[11]       Kam, C., Senaratna, D., McKinney, B., Xiao, Y. and Song, M., 2013. The VDC scorecard: Formulation and validation. Center for Integrated Facility Engineering: Stanford University.

[12]       Koucha, A.M., Illikainena, K., and Perälä, S., 2018. Key Factors of an Initial BIM Implementation Framework for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs). International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction. ISARC.

[13]       Kreider, R. G. 2011. Organisaitonal BIM Assessment. Penn State Computer Integrated Construction.

[14]       Maya, R.A., 2016. Performance management for Syrian construction projects. International Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 5(3), pp.65-78.

[15]       McPartland, R. (2018). BIM Levels explained. [online] NBS. Available at: https://www.thenbs.com/knowledge/bim-levels-explained [Accessed 6 Jul. 2018].

[16]       NBS (2017). National BIM Report 2017. [online] National Building Specification. Available at: https://www.thenbs.com/knowledge/nbs-national-bim-report-2017 [Accessed 6 Jul. 2018].

[17]       Omar, H.S., 2015. Solutions for the UAE architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry to mandate building information modeling (BIM) (Doctoral dissertation, The British University in Dubai (BUiD)).

[18]       Penttilä, H., 2006. Describing the changes in architectural information technology to understand design complexity and free-form architectural expression. Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon), 11(29), pp.395-408.

[19]       Sinclair, S. (2012). Building Information Modelling (BIM) & English Law - Real Estate and Construction - UK. [online] Mondaq.com. Available at: http://www.mondaq.com/uk/x/195698/Building+Construction/Building+Information+Modelling+BIM+English+Law [Accessed 6 Jul. 2018].

[20]       Succar, B. (2010b). The five components of BIM performance measurement. Paper presented at the CIB World Congress. 

[21]       Succar, B., 2010a. Building information modeling maturity matrix. In Handbook of research on building information modeling and construction informatics: Concepts and technologies (pp. 65-103). IGI Global. 

[22]       Succar, B., 2010b, May. The five components of BIM performance measurement. In CIB World Congress (pp. 2-50).

[23]       Ventures (2018). Construction Projects in Syria. [Online] Ventures ONSITE. Available at: https://www.venturesonsite.com/projects/projects-in-syria/construction-projects-in-syria [Accessed 13 Jul. 2018].

 

 

 


Cite this Article as :
Style #
MLA Sonia Ahmed, Petr DlasK, Omar Selim, Ashraf Elhendawi. "BIM Performance Improvement Framework for Syrian AEC Companies." International Journal of BIM and Engineering Science, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2018 ,PP. 20-41 (Doi   :  https://doi.org/10.54216/IJBES.010102)
APA Sonia Ahmed, Petr DlasK, Omar Selim, Ashraf Elhendawi. (2018). BIM Performance Improvement Framework for Syrian AEC Companies. Journal of International Journal of BIM and Engineering Science, 1 ( 1 ), 20-41 (Doi   :  https://doi.org/10.54216/IJBES.010102)
Chicago Sonia Ahmed, Petr DlasK, Omar Selim, Ashraf Elhendawi. "BIM Performance Improvement Framework for Syrian AEC Companies." Journal of International Journal of BIM and Engineering Science, 1 no. 1 (2018): 20-41 (Doi   :  https://doi.org/10.54216/IJBES.010102)
Harvard Sonia Ahmed, Petr DlasK, Omar Selim, Ashraf Elhendawi. (2018). BIM Performance Improvement Framework for Syrian AEC Companies. Journal of International Journal of BIM and Engineering Science, 1 ( 1 ), 20-41 (Doi   :  https://doi.org/10.54216/IJBES.010102)
Vancouver Sonia Ahmed, Petr DlasK, Omar Selim, Ashraf Elhendawi. BIM Performance Improvement Framework for Syrian AEC Companies. Journal of International Journal of BIM and Engineering Science, (2018); 1 ( 1 ): 20-41 (Doi   :  https://doi.org/10.54216/IJBES.010102)
IEEE Sonia Ahmed, Petr DlasK, Omar Selim, Ashraf Elhendawi, BIM Performance Improvement Framework for Syrian AEC Companies, Journal of International Journal of BIM and Engineering Science, Vol. 1 , No. 1 , (2018) : 20-41 (Doi   :  https://doi.org/10.54216/IJBES.010102)