2571-1075ISSN (Online)
Volume 12 , Issue 1 , PP: 01-20, 2026 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article
Mohammed Ali Alshamali 1 *
Doi: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJBES.120101
This study examines the architectural elements that characterize the Islamic style, such as the inner courtyard, mashrabiyas (latticework screens), windcatchers, and others, explaining their role in achieving a balance between human needs and climatic conditions. It also explores the traditional building materials used in the Damascene house and their role in providing thermal insulation and adapting to the surrounding environment. The study employs a descriptive-analytical approach, collecting data through an analysis of historical and contemporary literature on the Damascene house as a model of traditional Islamic architecture. This includes the use of sustainable materials (stone, tuff, wood, etc.) and designs that achieve energy efficiency and rely on renewable energy sources (mashrabiyas, windcatchers, and inner courtyards). These elements are then compared with their counterparts in modern architectural designs. To assess the sustainability of the Damascene house, it was evaluated using the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) system. The number of points it could receive if it met the LEED assessment criteria was calculated, and its sustainability rating was determined. The LEED system assigns several ratings that reflect the degree of sustainability achieved by a building: Standard, Silver, Gold, and Platinum. The study concluded that the high level of sustainability provided by the Damascene house makes it a successful sustainable model that combines Islamic cultural heritage with harsh and challenging climatic conditions. It received a Platinum rating with a sustainability score of (82.85%). This underscores the need to draw inspiration from the creative elements found in the Damascene house in modern building designs, achieving significant economic savings and reducing negative environmental impacts. A set of recommendations and proposals was developed to utilize the elements and components of the Damascene Islamic house in achieving the desired sustainability.
Damascene Islamic House , Sustainability , LEED System , Environmentally Friendly Materials , Thermal Comfort , Natural Ventilation
[1] O. Othman, “Traditional architecture in Damascus: Human interaction with the environment,” Journal of Studies in Architecture, 2014.
[2] F. Issa, “Evaluating the impact of architectural design on thermal comfort in Damascene houses,” Journal of Engineering Research, 2016.
[3] N. Al-Zein, “Climate design in traditional houses: A case study of the Damascene house,” Journal of Sustainable Architecture, 2019.
[4] Y. Ali, “Catches and their use in traditional houses,” Journal of Environmental Architecture, 2017.
[5] S. Abdullah, “The effect of building materials on improving the thermal performance of buildings,” Journal of Architecture and Planning, 2012.
[6] M. A. Al-Shamali, Development of an Intelligent System for the Evaluation of Green Sustainable Buildings in Syria, Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Damascus, Damascus, Syria, 2020.
[7] O. Grabar, The Formation of Islamic Art. New Haven, CT, USA: Yale Univ. Press, 1987.
[8] R. Hillenbrand, Islamic Architecture: Form, Function, and Meaning. Edinburgh, U.K.: Edinburgh Univ. Press, 1994.
[9] M. Abouelanwar, M. Aldars, Z. Alrawi, and O. Alrawi, “Formation in Islamic architecture as a tool to confront climate change: Towards a contemporary employment of sustainability principles in Islamic architecture,” Sustainable Architecture and Urbanism, 2024.
[10] S. A. Waheeb, “Environmental and cultural sustainability of the architectural elements of two historical mosques in historic Jeddah,” Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Engineering and Architecture, vol. 14, pp. 26–35, 2023.
[11] M. A. Metallaoui and A. I. Dali, “Sustainable building materials in the architecture of Saudi Arabian oases: Past and present examining AlUla,” in Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Creativity, Technology, and Sustainability (CCTS 2024), D. Berkouk et al., Eds. Singapore: Springer, 2025, doi: 10.1007/978-981-97-8588-9_42.
[12] Ibrahim, K. Al Shomely, and F. Eltarabishi, “Sustainability implications of utilizing Islamic geometric patterns in contemporary designs: A systematic analysis,” Buildings, 2023.
[13] Y. Alassaf, “Comprehensive review of the advancements, benefits, challenges, and design integration of energy-efficient materials for sustainable buildings,” Buildings, vol. 14, p. 2994, 2024.
[14] U. Berardi, “Sustainability assessment in the construction sector: Rating systems and rated buildings,” Sustainable Development, vol. 20, no. 6, 2011.
[15] Rezaallah, C. Bolognesi, and R. A. Khoraskani, “LEED and BREEAM: Comparison between policies, assessment criteria, and calculation methods,” 2014.
[16] U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), LEED 2009 for New Construction and Major Renovations, Washington, DC, USA, 2008, p. 47.
[17] E. Fernandez, Material Architecture: Emergent Materials for Innovative Buildings and Ecological Construction. Oxford, U.K.: Architectural Press, 2006, p. 75.
[18] U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), “U.S. Green Building Council,” [Online]. Available: http://www.usgbc.org. Accessed: yyyy.
[19] J. M. R. P. Silva, A. F. F. de Oliveira, and L. M. S. Santos, “Sustainable building assessment: A comparative analysis of BREEAM and LEED in different environmental contexts,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 1–15, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12124891.
