Volume 5 , Issue 2 , PP: 22-33, 2026 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article
Safa S. Abdul-Jabbar 1 * , Faris H. Rizk 2
Doi: https://doi.org/10.54216/MOR.050202
Power quality disturbances (PQDs) have become an increasingly critical concern in modern power systems due to the rising integration of renewable energy resources, widespread use of power-electronic interfaced loads, and the growing complexity of cyber-physical grid infrastructures. These evolving conditions have introduced new sources of variability, uncertainty, and vulnerability into power networks, making it significantly more challenging to maintain voltage stability, waveform purity, and overall system reliability. Traditional deterministic methods for disturbance detection and classification are no longer sufficient to address the nonlinear, nonstationary, and high-dimensional nature of contemporary PQD phenomena. As the operational landscape grows more dynamic, there is a pressing need for analytical frameworks that can adaptively learn, generalize, and respond to diverse disturbance scenarios in real time. This study provides a comprehensive examination of recent advancements in PQD research, emphasizing the evolution toward hybrid analytical frameworks that integrate advanced signal processing, machine learning, and metaheuristic optimization. The literature demonstrates that hybrid models—such as continuous wavelet transform (CWT) combined with convolutional neural networks (CNNs), Stockwell transform integrated with kernel-based extreme learning machines (ELMs), and metaheuristic-optimized classifiers—significantly enhance detection accuracy, robustness against noise, and adaptability to varying operating conditions. These hybrid systems leverage the strengths of each component: signal transforms enrich the representational quality of PQD features, deep architectures facilitate automatic feature learning, and optimization algorithms refine model parameters to achieve optimal performance across complex and uncertain environments. Metaheuristic algorithms including Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO), Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), Differential Evolution (DE), and hybrid variants have proven particularly effective for feature selection, classifier optimization, system-level enhancement, and mitigation strategies. Their ability to handle large, multimodal, and nonlinear search spaces makes them especially suitable for modern PQD challenges, where disturbance signatures may overlap, evolve over time, or be obscured by noise introduced by renewable energy fluctuations. Furthermore, recent work demonstrates the potential of ensemble-based and deep learning models optimized with metaheuristics to outperform conventional approaches in both accuracy and computational efficiency, thereby advancing the state-of-the-art in PQD detection technologies. Additionally, the convergence of PQD analysis with cybersecurity highlights an emerging and increasingly urgent research frontier. As smart grids become more interconnected and reliant on information and communication technologies, they face heightened risks from cyber-attacks capable of inducing, masking, or mimicking PQ disturbances. Such adversarial actions pose significant threats to grid stability, integrity, and operational safety. Metaheuristic-enhanced deep learning methods have shown promise for cyber-physical intrusion detection by enabling classification models to identify subtle, intentionally disguised anomalies within PQ data streams. This hybrid approach provides a pathway toward resilient PQ monitoring frameworks that are capable of learning and adapting to evolving attack strategies. Despite notable advancements, several key challenges persist. First, the lack of standardized real-world datasets limits the generalizability and reproducibility of PQD research, particularly within renewable-dominated or cyber-physical grid environments. Second, the high computational demands of hybrid models hinder their deployment in real-time or resource-constrained settings, calling for advancements in lightweight architectures, model compression, and edge-intelligent PQD systems. Third, the field lacks unified frameworks that integrate PQ detection, classification, and mitigation with operational decision-making, economic constraints, and regulatory requirements. Finally, adaptive cyber-physical intrusion detection frameworks remain underdeveloped, especially for zero-day attacks and data-limited conditions. Overall, this review underscores the necessity of holistic, intelligent, and scalable approaches to PQD management. It identifies critical directions for future research, including real-time system integration, computationally efficient hybrid architectures, multiobjective optimization strategies, and robust cybersecurity-aware PQD analytics. These innovations are essential for achieving resilient next-generation smart grids capable of maintaining high power quality under increasingly dynamic, decentralized, and uncertain operating conditions.
Power quality disturbances , Continuous wavelet transform , Extreme learning machines , Particle swarm optimization , Grey wolf optimization
[1] Chee-Wooi Ten and Yunhe Hou. Modern power system analysis. CRC Press, 2024.
[2] Jianbing Feng, Tao Yu, Kuozhen Zhang, and Lefeng Cheng. Integration of multi-agent systems and artificial intelligence in self-healing subway power supply systems: Advancements in fault diagnosis, isolation, and recovery. Processes, 13(4):1144, 2025.
[3] Steven W Blume. Electric power system basics for the nonelectrical professional. John Wiley & Sons, 2025.
[4] Mustafa R Ismael, Haider J Abd, and Raad Z Homod. An algorithm for the classification of power quality disturbance signals using a tunable-q-factor wavelet transform and ensemble learning methodology. Electrical Engineering, 106(4):5253–5265, 2024.
[5] Anshuman Bhuyan, Basanta K Panigrahi, Jyoti Shukla, and Kumaresh Pal. A comprehensive survey on detection and classification of power quality. Future Power Network and Smart Energy Systems, Volume 2: Proceedings of FPNSES 2023, 2:215, 2025.
[6] Rajendra Mahla and Man Mohan Garg. Power quality disturbances and detection methods: A brief review. In 2024 IEEE 11th Power India International Conference (PIICON), pages 1–6, 2024.
[7] Kishor V Bhadane, Mohan Thakre, and Rohit Devikar. Measurement and analysis of voltage sag and swell in large penetrated grid-connected wind farm. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series B, 105(3):713–732, 2024.
[8] Ziad M. Ali, Martin Calasan, Francisco Jurado, and Shady H. E. Abdel Aleem. Complexities of power ´ quality and harmonic-induced overheating in modern power grids studies: Challenges and solutions. IEEE Access, 12:151554–151597, 2024.
[9] Gaurav Kumar Chaturvedi, Nitin Gupta, Kapil Shukla, and Ajay Kumar. A comprehensive review on dynamic voltage restorer technologies: architecture, topologies, control strategies, and deployment. International Journal of Ambient Energy, 46(1):2571870, 2025.
[10] Elias Kyriakides, Siddharth Suryanarayanan, and Vijay Vittal, editors. Electric Power Engineering Research and Education: A festschrift for Gerald T. Heydt. Power Electronics and Power Systems. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2015. [11] Tatireddy Ravi and K. Sathish Kumar. Detection and classification of power quality disturbances using stock well transform and improved grey wolf optimization-based kernel extreme learning machine. IEEE Access, 11:61710–61727, 2023. Publisher: IEEE.
[12] Muddu Chethan and Ravi Kuppan. A review of facts device implementation in power systems using optimization techniques. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 71(1):18, 2024.
[13] C.R. Rajesh, P. Meenalochini, Sathish Kumar Kannaiah, and A. Bindu. A hybrid control topology for cascaded h-bridge multilevel inverter to improve the power quality of smart grid connected system: Nborernn approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 238:122054, 2024.
[14] Afifa Akter, Ehsanul Islam Zafir, Nazia Hasan Dana, Rahul Joysoyal, Subrata K. Sarker, Li Li, S M Muyeen, Sajal K. Das, and Innocent Kamwa. A review on microgrid optimization with meta-heuristic techniques: Scopes, trends and recommendation. Energy Strategy Reviews, 51:101298, 2024.
[15] Jisheng Huang, Shanshan Zhou, Guangming Li, and Qiang Shen. Real-time monitoring and optimization methods for user-side energy management based on edge computing. Scientific Reports, 15(1):24890, 2025.
[16] Seçkin Karasu and Zehra Saraç. The effects on classifier performance of 2D discrete wavelet transform analysis and whale optimization algorithm for recognition of power quality disturbances. Cognitive Systems Research, 75:1–15, 2022. Publisher: Elsevier.
[17] Bouchra Feriel KHALDI, Fatma Zohra DEKHANDJI, and Abdelmadjid RECIOUI. Power Quality Disturbances: A review of Detection, Classification, Optimization, and Mitigation Techniques. Algerian Journal of Signals and Systems, 9(4):261–286, 2024.
[18] Rajkumar Kaushik, Om Prakash Mahela, Pramod Kumar Bhatt, Baseem Khan, Sanjeevikumar Padmanaban, and Frede Blaabjerg. A hybrid algorithm for recognition of power quality disturbances. IEEE access, 8:229184–229200, 2020. Publisher: IEEE.
[19] Supakan Janthong and Pornchai Phukpattaranont. Power quality disturbance detection using improved grasshopper optimization and adaptive boosted random forest. Electrical Engineering, July 2025.
[20] Umamani Subudhi and Sambit Dash. Detection and classification of power quality disturbances using GWO ELM. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 22:100204, 2021. Publisher: Elsevier.
[21] Peeyush Kala, Puneet Joshi, Medha Joshi, Sanjay Agarwal, and Lokesh K. Yadav. Tackling Power Quality Issues Using Metaheuristics. In Hasmat Malik, Atif Iqbal, Puneet Joshi, Sanjay Agrawal, and Farhad Ilahi Bakhsh, editors, Metaheuristic and Evolutionary Computation: Algorithms and Applications, volume 916, pages 63–85. Springer Singapore, Singapore, 2021. Series Title: Studies in Computational Intelligence.
[22] Hamad Naeem, Farhan Ullah, and Gautam Srivastava. Classification of intrusion cyber-attacks in smart power grids using deep ensemble learning with metaheuristic-based optimization. Expert Systems, 42(1):e13556, January 2025.
[23] Ahmad Eid. Power Quality Enhancement of Balanced/Unbalanced Distribution Systems Using Metaheuristic Optimizations. In Ahmed F. Zobaa and Shady H.E. Abdel Aleem, editors, Modernization of Electric Power Systems, pages 235–268. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2023.
[24] Belkis Eristi and Huseyin Eristi. Classification of Power Quality Disturbances in Solar PV Integrated Power System Based on a Hybrid Deep Learning Approach. International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, 2022:1–13, June 2022. [25] R. Ahila, V. Sadasivam, and K. Manimala. PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION-BASED FEATURE SELECTION AND PARAMETER OPTIMIZATION FOR POWER SYSTEM DISTURBANCES CLASSIFICATION. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 26(9):832–861, October 2012.
[26] Touqeer Ahmed Jumani, Mohd Wazir Mustafa, Ali S. Alghamdi, Madihah Md Rasid, Arbab Alamgir, and Ahmed Bilal Awan. Swarm intelligence-based optimization techniques for dynamic response and power quality enhancement of AC microgrids: A comprehensive review. IEEE Access, 8:75986–76001, 2020. Publisher: IEEE.
[27] Birsen Gümü¸s, Melih Çoban, and Suleyman Sungur Tezcan. Metasezgisel Tabanlı Özellik Seçim Algoritmalarının Güç Kalitesi Olaylarının Sınıflandırılmasına Etkisinin ˙Incelenmesi. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 16(2):646–658, 2024. Publisher: Kirikkale University.
[28] Sayawu Yakubu Diaba, Miadreza Shafie-Khah, and Mohammed Elmusrati. Cyber security in power systems using meta-heuristic and deep learning algorithms. IEEe Access, 11:18660–18672, 2023. Publisher: IEEE.
[29] Kayode E. Adetunji, Ivan W. Hofsajer, Adnan M. Abu-Mahfouz, and Ling Cheng. A review of metaheuristic techniques for optimal integration of electrical units in distribution networks. IEEE Access, 9:5046–5068, 2020. Publisher: IEEE.
[30] K. R. Suja. Mitigation of power quality issues in smart grid using levy flight based moth flame optimization algorithm. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 12(10):9209–9228, October 2021.