Galoitica: Journal of Mathematical Structures and Applications
Journal DOI
2834-5568ISSN (Online)
Volume 12 , Issue 1 , PP: 09-18, 2025 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article
Prem Kumar Singh 1 *
Doi: https://doi.org/10.54216/GJMSA.0120102
Recent time retraction analysis is considered as one of the major issues. The retraction is a regular process where some time it is true, some time happen due to conflict, some time due to indescribable parameters or last via self retraction by authors or Editor. It is happening due to pressure on academia and its quality measurement by quantitative publications and citation rather than qualitative. It forces researchers to add the co-authors for increment, promotion, or citation rather than focusing on true research. Some time the retraction happens due to self correction, genuine mistake or conflict of interest with editor. These types of genuine or self retraction happended using Turiyam awareness of authors or editor which can be considered as positive retraction. It is also noted that negative results are also part of the research as equal to positive or noble research. It is difficult to characterize these types of retraction. In this paper author has introduced a mathematical model for precise analysis of retracted paper and its characterization in true (t), false(f), indeterminant (i) and liberal (l) region for intellectual measurement. Same time the extension of work for undefined or unknown paramerters of retraction or unretraction is also discussed using the complement of Turiyam operator with an example.
Anektavad , Knowledge representation , Retraction , Scopus , Uncertainty , Turiyam set
[1] Candal-Pedreira, C., Ross, J. S., Ruano-Ravina, A., Egilman, D. S., Fernández, E., & Pérez-Ríos, M. "Retractions from paper mills: cross-sectional study," BMJ, vol. 379, 2022.
[2] Lu, S. F., Jin, G. Z., Uzzi, B., & Jones, B. "The retraction penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science," Scientific Reports, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 3146, 2013.
[3] Elango, B., Kozak, M., & Rajendran, P. "Analysis of retractions in Indian science," Scientometrics, vol. 119, no. 2, pp. 1081-1094, 2019.
[4] Worrall, J. L., & Cohn, E. G. "Citation data and analysis: limitations and shortcomings," Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 327-340, 2023.
[5] Kleinert, S. "COPE's retraction guidelines," The Lancet, vol. 374, no. 9705, pp. 1876-1877, 2009.
[6] Tian, D., Hu, X., Qian, Y., & Li, J. "Exploring the scientific impact of negative results," Journal of Informetrics, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 101481, 2024.
[7] Bik, E. M. "Publishing negative results is good for science," Access Microbiology, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 000792, 2024.
[8] Abraham, R. H. "Mysticism in the history of mathematics," Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, vol. 131, pp. 261-272, 2017.
[9] Singh, P. K. “A note on basic proof of some famous mathematical theorem and its illustration”, J Neutrosophic Fuzzy Syst, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 39-53, 2022.
[10] Xiao, Y., Chen, J., Wu, X. H., & Qiu, Q. M. “High retraction rate of Chinese articles: it is time to do something about academic misconduct,” Postgraduate Medical Journal, vol. 98, no.1163, pp. 653-654, 2022.
[11] Ameyaw-Brobbey, T. “A lost chance for what? COVID-19 and its repercussions on global public opinion of China’s development model and international leadership,” Journal of International Studies, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 172-190, 2021.
[14] Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Dobránszki, J., “Highly cited retracted papers,” Scientometrics, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 1653-1661, 2017.
[15] Bolland, M. J., Grey, A., & Avenell, A., “Citation of retracted publications: A challenging problem,” Accountability in Research, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 18-25, 2022.
[16] Singh, P. K. “Data with Turiyam set for fourth dimension quantum information processing,” Journal of Neutrosophic and Fuzzy Systems, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 9-23 2021.
[17] Singh, P. K., “Four-Way Turiyam set-based human quantum cognition analysis,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 144-151, 2022.
[18] Hirsch, J.E., “hα: An index to quantify an individual’s scientific leadership,” Scientometrics, vol. 118, pp. 673–686, 2019.
[19] Dotson, D. S., “Mega-authorship implications: How many scientists can fit into one cell?,” Accountability in Research, vol. 32, no 4, pp. 612-635, 2024.
[20] Siva, N., & Rajendran, P., “Retracted publications in BRICS countries: an analytical study,” Scientometrics, vol. 128, no 12, pp. 6313-6333, 2023.
[21] Singh, P.K. “t-index: entropy based random document and citation analysis using average h-index,” Scientometrics, vol. 127, pp. 637–660, 2022.
[22] Nath, S. B., Marcus, S. C., & Druss, B. G., “Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes?,” Medical journal of Australia, vol. 185, no. 3, pp. 152-154, 2006.
[23] Planck, M. “RETRACTED ARTICLE: Naturwissenschaft und reale Außenwelt,” Naturwissenschaften, vol. 28, pp. 778–779, 1940.
[24] Planck, M. “RETRACTED ARTICLE: Sinn und Grenzen der exakten Wissenschaft,” Naturwissenschaften, vol. 30, pp. 125–133, 1942.
[25] Oransky I. “The retraction watch leaderboard. Retraction Watch”; 2015. Available at: http:// retractionwatch.com/the-retraction-watch-leaderboard/.
[26] Shewan, L. G., & Coats, A. J. “Ethics in the authorship and publishing of scientific articles,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 144, no. 1, pp. 1-2, 2010.
[27] Campos-Varela, I., & Ruano-Raviña, A. “Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors,” Gaceta Sanitaria, vol. 33, pp. 356-360, 2019.
[28] Ferguson C, Marcus A, Oransky I. “Publishing: the peer-review scam,” Nature, vol. 515, non. 7528, pp. 480–482, 2014.
[29] Hanner, O., “Retraction and extension of mappings of metric and nonmetric spaces,” Arkiv för matematik, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 315-360, 1952.
[30] Singh, P. K., & Ch, A. K. “A note on constructing fuzzy homomorphism map for a given fuzzy formal context,” In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Soft Computing for Problem Solving: SocProS 2013, vol. 1, pp. 845-855, 2013.
[31] Fang, F. C., & Casadevall, A. “Retracted science and the retraction index,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 79, no. 10, pp. 3855-3859, 2011.
[32] Quilliot, A. “A retraction problem in graph theory,” Discrete Mathematics, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 61-71, 1985.
[33] Belnap J. N. “A useful four-valued logic,”. In:Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic, Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logic. Indiana University, pp 8-37, 1985.
[34] G.A. Ganati, V. N. S. R. Repalle, M.A. Ashebo. “Relations in the context of Turiyam sets,” BMC Research Notes, vol. 16, no 1, pp.1-6, 2023,
[35] G.A. Ganati, V. N. S. R. Repalle, M.A. Ashebo, M. Amini, “Turiyam Graphs and its Applications,” Information Sciences Letters, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 2423-2434, 2023.
[36] M. Bal, Singh. P. K., K. D. Ahmad, “A Short Introduction to The Concept Of Symbolic Turiyam Matrix,” Journal of Neutrosophic and Fuzzy Systems, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 88-99, 2022.
[37] A. Ani, M. Mashadi, S. “Gemawati, Invers Moore-Penrose pada Matriks Turiyam Simbolik Real,” Jambura Journal of Mathematics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 95-114, 2023.
[38] Singh, P. K., Surathu, N., & Prakash, G. S. “Turiyam Based Four Way Unknown Profile Characterization on Social Networks,” Galoitica: Journal of Mathematical Structures and Applications, vol. 10 , no. 2, pp. 27-43, 2024.
