International Journal of Advances in Applied Computational Intelligence
Journal DOI
2833-5600ISSN (Online)
Volume 1 , Issue 1 , PP: 08-22, 2022 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article
Rose Aljanada 1 * , Ghadeer W. Abukhalil 2 , Aseel M. Alfaisal 3 , Raghad M. Alfaisal 4
Doi: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJAACI.010101
This inclination is caused by the fact that the topic of technology incorporation has not received enough attention. The use of information and communication technology (ICT) like Google Glass has allowed instructors and students to engage in a technology-based educational setting because of the subsequent dramatic transformation. Yet, just a small number of schools and universities have started using Google Glass in their classrooms. This research aims to look at Google Glass adoption in the UAE. We reasoned those educating instructors and students about Google Glass's effective capabilities would help them make up their minds about adopting the device in classrooms. The layout of a framework that connects TAM with other influential factors is discussed in this study. To improve the interaction between instructors and learners in the classroom, this research explored the incorporation of the technology acceptance model (TAM) with the widely acknowledged potent features of the gadget, such as the teaching and learning mediator, "Motivation," and trust and information privacy. 750 questionnaires from various universities were acquired in total. According to the student's survey data gathered, the research model was studied using partial least squares-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and machine learning models. The findings showed a significant association between motivation, trust, and privacy, as well as perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of Google Glass. Moreover, the adoption of Google Glass was substantially correlated with perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. The perceived ease of use, trust, and privacy are all important factors in the adoption of Google Glass. These results' practical implications for subsequent research were also discussed.
Google Glass , Technology Acceptance Model , PLS-SEM , and Machine Learning Models.
[1] N. M. Kumar, P. R. Krishna, P. K. Pagadala, and N. M. S. Kumar, “Use of smart glasses in education-a study,” in 2018 2nd International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud)(I-SMAC) I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud)(I-SMAC), 2018 2nd International Conference on, 2018, pp. 56–59.
[2] S. Higgins, Z. Xiao, and M. Katsipataki, “The impact of digital technology on learning: A summary for the education endowment foundation,” Durham, UK Educ. Endow. Found. Durham Univ., 2012.
[3] I. Akour, M. Alshurideh, B. Al Kurdi, A. Al Ali, and S. Salloum, “Using machine learning algorithms to predict people’s intention to use mobile learning platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic: Machine learning approach,” JMIR Med. Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, 2021.
[4] S. Alshurideh, M., Al Kurdi, B., Abumari, A., and Salloum, “Pharmaceutical Promotion Tools Effect on Physician’s Adoption of Medicine Prescribing: Evidence from Jordan,” Mod. Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 210–222, 2018.
[5] S. A. Salloum, R. Khan, and K. Shaalan, “A Survey of Semantic Analysis Approaches,” in Joint European-US Workshop on Applications of Invariance in Computer Vision, 2020, pp. 61–70.
[6] S. A. Salloum, C. Mhamdi, B. Al Kurdi, and K. Shaalan, “Factors affecting the Adoption and Meaningful Use of Social Media: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach,” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Lang. Stud., vol. 2, no. 3, 2018.
[7] S. A. Salloum, M. Al-Emran, and K. Shaalan, “Mining Text in News Channels: A Case Study from Facebook,” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Lang. Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2017.
[8] S. A. Salloum, M. Al-Emran, and K. Shaalan, “A Survey of Lexical Functional Grammar in the Arabic Context,” Int. J. Com. Net. Tech, vol. 4, no. 3, 2016.
[9] D. A. Berque and J. T. Newman, “GlassClass: Exploring the Design, Implementation, and Acceptance of Google Glass in the Classroom,” in International Conference on Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality, 2015, pp. 243–250.
[10] S. F. S. Alhashmi, S. A. Salloum, and C. Mhamdi, “Implementing Artificial Intelligence in the United Arab Emirates Healthcare Sector: An Extended Technology Acceptance Model,” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Lang. Stud., vol. 3, no. 3, 2019.
[11] S. A. Salloum and K. Shaalan, “Adoption of E-Book for University Students,” in International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics, 2018, pp. 481–494.
[12] M. T. Alshurideh, B. Al Kurdi, and S. A. Salloum, “The moderation effect of gender on accepting electronic payment technology: a study on United Arab Emirates consumers,” Rev. Int. Bus. Strateg., 2021.
[13] A. Aburayya et al., “An Empirical Examination of the Effect of TQM Practices on Hospital Service Quality: An Assessment Study in UAE Hospitals.”
[14] R. Saeed Al-Maroof, K. Alhumaid, and S. Salloum, “The Continuous Intention to Use E-Learning, from Two Different Perspectives,” Educ. Sci., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 6, 2020.
[15] M. Alghizzawi, M. Habes, and S. A. Salloum, The Relationship Between Digital Media and Marketing Medical Tourism Destinations in Jordan: Facebook Perspective, vol. 1058. 2020.
[16] R. S. Al-Maroof, S. A. Salloum, A. Q. AlHamadand, and K. Shaalan, “Understanding an Extension Technology Acceptance Model of Google Translation: A Multi-Cultural Study in United Arab Emirates,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 14, no. 03, pp. 157–178, 2020.
[17] R. Al-Maroof et al., “The acceptance of social media video for knowledge acquisition, sharing and application: A com-parative study among YouTube users and TikTok Users’ for medical purposes,” Int. J. Data Netw. Sci., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 197–214, 2021.
[18] T. Zarraonandia, P. Díaz, Á. Montero, I. Aedo, and T. Onorati, “Using a Google Glass-based Classroom Feedback System to improve students to teacher communication,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 16837–16846, 2019.
[19] S. Larabi Marie-Sainte, M. S. Alrazgan, F. Bousbahi, S. Ghouzali, and W. Abdul, “From mobile to wearable system: a wearable RFID system to enhance teaching and learning conditions,” Mob. Inf. Syst., vol. 2016, 2016.
[20] J. M. Woodside, “Wearable technology acceptance model: Google Glass,” in Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 2015, pp. 1800–1802.
[21] R. Kirkham and C. Greenhalgh, “Social access vs. privacy in wearable computing: a case study of autism,” IEEE Pervasive Comput., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 26–33, 2015.
[22] E. Boykin, “Google glass in the class: Wearable technology of the educational future,” Retrieved January, vol. 9, p. 2018, 2014.
[23] H. M. Knight, P. R. Gajendragadkar, and A. Bokhari, “Wearable technology: using Google Glass as a teaching tool,” Case Reports, vol. 2015, 2015.
[24] G. R. Parslow, “Commentary: Google glass: A head‐up display to facilitate teaching and learning,” Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 91–92, 2014.
[25] A.-D. Salamin, “Using Google Glass to enrich printed textbooks in a blended learning environment to meet digital natives’ expectations,” in E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, 2014, pp. 1741–1748.
[26] M. Burke, “ways Google Glass can be used in education.” 5AD.
[27] S. S. A. Al-Maroof R.S., “An Integrated Model of Continuous Intention to Use of Google Classroom.,” Al-Emran M., Shaalan K., Hassanien A. Recent Adv. Intell. Syst. Smart Appl. Stud. Syst. Decis. Control. vol 295. Springer, Cham, 2021.
[28] R. S. Al-Maroof, M. T. Alshurideh, S. A. Salloum, A. Q. M. AlHamad, and T. Gaber, “Acceptance of Google Meet during the spread of Coronavirus by Arab university students,” in Informatics, 2021, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 24.
[29] H. Yousuf, A. Y. Zainal, M. Alshurideh, and S. A. Salloum, “Artificial Intelligence Models in Power System Analysis,” in Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Development: Theory, Practice and Future Applications, Springer, pp. 231–242.
[30] M. AlShamsi, S. A. Salloum, M. Alshurideh, and S. Abdallah, “Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain for Transparency in Governance,” in Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Development: Theory, Practice and Future Applications, Springer, pp. 219–230.
[31] M. Habes, M. Alghizzawi, S. A. Salloum, and C. Mhamdi, “Effects of Facebook Personal News Sharing on Building Social Capital in Jordanian Universities,” in Recent Advances in Intelligent Systems and Smart Applications, Springer, 2020, pp. 653–670.
[32] Z. E. Brewer, H. C. Fann, W. D. Ogden, T. A. Burdon, and A. Y. Sheikh, “Inheriting the learner’s view: a Google Glass-based wearable computing platform for improving surgical trainee performance,” J. Surg. Educ., vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 682–688, 2016.
[33] G. A. Dafoulas, C. Maia, and M. Loomes, “Using Optical Head-Mounted Devices (OHMD) for provision of feedback in education,” in 2016 12th International Conference on Intelligent Environments (IE), 2016, pp. 159–162.
[34] A. Adapa, F. F.-H. Nah, R. H. Hall, K. Siau, and S. N. Smith, “Factors influencing the adoption of smart wearable devices,” Int. J. Human–Computer Interact., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 399–409, 2018.
[35] K. Sidiya, N. Alzanbagi, and A. Bensenouci, “Google glass and Apple Watch will they become our learning tools?,” in 2015 12th Learning and Technology Conference, 2015, pp. 6–8.
[36] M. Silva, D. Freitas, E. Neto, C. Lins, V. Teichrieb, and J. M. Teixeira, “Glassist: using augmented reality on Google Glass as an aid to classroom management,” in 2014 XVI Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality, 2014, pp. 37–44.
[37] F. D. Davis, “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Q., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989.
[38] J. He, J. S. McCarley, K. Crager, M. Jadliwala, L. Hua, and S. Huang, “Does wearable device bring distraction closer to drivers? Comparing smartphones and Google Glass,” Appl. Ergon., vol. 70, pp. 156–166, 2018.
[39] M. Dehghani, “An assessment towards adoption and diffusion of smart wearable technologies by consumers: the cases of smart watch and fitness wristband products.,” in HT (Extended Proceedings), 2016, pp. 1–6.
[40] P. A. Rauschnabel, J. He, and Y. K. Ro, “Antecedents to the adoption of augmented reality smart glasses: A closer look at privacy risks,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 92, pp. 374–384, 2018.
[41] M. H. Hansen, “Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage,” Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 175–190, 1994.
[42] H. Drummond, “The Icarus paradox: An analysis of a totally destructive system,” J. Inf. Technol., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 176–184, 2008.
[43] J. Huang, Y. Lin, and S. Chuang, “Elucidating user behavior of mobile learning,” Electron. Libr., 2007.
[44] S.-H. Liu, H.-L. Liao, and J. A. Pratt, “Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance,” Comput. Educ., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 599–607, 2009.
[45] Y.-M. Cheng, S.-J. Lou, S.-H. Kuo, and R.-C. Shih, “Investigating elementary school students’ technology acceptance by applying digital game-based learning to environmental education,” Australas. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 29, no. 1, 2013.
[46] J.-Y. Hsu, C.-C. Chen, and P.-F. Ting, “Understanding MOOC continuance: An empirical examination of social support theory,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1100–1118, 2018.
[47] J. Khlaisang, T. Teo, and F. Huang, “Acceptance of a flipped smart application for learning: a study among Thai university students,” Interact. Learn. Environ., pp. 1–18, 2019.
[48] F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Q., pp. 319–340, 1989.
[49] P. A. Rauschnabel, A. Brem, and B. S. Ivens, “Who will buy smart glasses? Empirical results of two pre-market-entry studies on the role of personality in individual awareness and intended adoption of Google Glass wearables,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 49, pp. 635–647, 2015.
[50] J. C. Nunnally and I. H. Bernstein, “Psychometric theory,” 1978.
[51] K. Alameeri, M. Alshurideh, B. Al Kurdi, and S. A. Salloum, The Effect of Work Environment Happiness on Employee Leadership, vol. 1261 AISC. 2021.
[52] D. Barclay, C. Higgins, and R. Thompson, The Partial Least Squares (pls) Approach to Casual Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption Ans Use as an Illustration. 1995.
[53] I. Arpaci, “A hybrid modeling approach for predicting the educational use of mobile cloud computing services in higher education,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 90, pp. 181–187, 2019.
[54] J. F. Hair Jr, G. T. M. Hult, C. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, 2016.
[55] J. F. Hair, W. C. Black Jr, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson, “Multivariate Data Analysis”, Pearson Prentice Hall, USA,” 2010.
[56] C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, “Evaluating Structural Equation Models With Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” J. Mark. Res., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 39–50, 1981.
[57] J. Henseler, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, “A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling,” J. Acad. Mark. Sci., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 115–135, 2015.
[58] I. Akour, N. Alnazzawi, R. Alfaisal, and S. A. Salloum, “USING CLASSICAL MACHINE LEARNING FOR PHISHING WEBSITES DETECTION FROM URLS.”
[59] H. Yousuf, A. Q. Al-Hamad, and S. Salloum, “An Overview on CryptDb and Word2vec Approaches.”
[60] A. Wahdan, S. A. Salloum, and K. Shaalan, “Qualitative study in Natural Language Processing: text classification,” in International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Intelligent Systems, 2021, pp. 83–92.
[61] F. Almatrooshi, S. Alhammadi, S. A. Salloum, and K. Shaalan, “Text and web content mining: a systematic review,” in International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Intelligent Systems, 2021, pp. 79–87.
[62] S. Salloum, T. Gaber, S. Vadera, and K. Shaalan, “Phishing Website Detection from URLs Using Classical Machine Learning ANN Model,” in International Conference on Security and Privacy in Communication Systems, 2021, pp. 509–523.
[63] A. A. Khamees, H. D. Hejazi, M. Alshurideh, and S. A. Salloum, “Classifying Audio Music Genres Using CNN and RNN,” Adv. Mach. Learn. Technol. Appl. Proc. AMLTA 2021, p. 315.
[64] A. Wahdan, S. A. Salloum, and K. Shaalan, “Text Classification of Arabic Text: Deep Learning in ANLP,” in Advanced Machine Learning Technologies and Applications: Proceedings of AMLTA 2021, 2021, pp. 95–103.
[65] S. A. Salloum, “Classifying Audio Music Genres Using a Multilayer Sequential Model,” Adv. Mach. Learn. Technol. Appl. Proc. AMLTA 2021, p. 301.
[66] S. A. Salloum, “Sentiment Analysis in Dialectal Arabic: A Systematic Review,” Adv. Mach. Learn. Technol. Appl. Proc. AMLTA 2021, p. 407.
[67] H. Yousuf, M. Lahzi, S. A. Salloum, and K. Shaalan, “A systematic review on sequence-to-sequence learning with neural network and its models.,” Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng., vol. 11, no. 3, 2021.
[68] H. Yousuf and S. Salloum, “Survey Analysis: Enhancing the Security of Vectorization by Using word2vec and CryptDB.”
[69] A. Alshamsi, R. Bayari, and S. Salloum, “Sentiment analysis in English Texts,” Adv. Sci. Technol. Eng. Syst., vol. 5, no. 6, 2020.
[70] C. Mhamdi, M. Al-Emran, and S. A. Salloum, Text mining and analytics: A case study from news channels posts on Facebook, vol. 740. 2018.
[71] S. A. Salloum, M. Al-Emran, A. A. Monem, and K. Shaalan, Using text mining techniques for extracting information from research articles, vol. 740. 2018.
[72] M. Al-Emran, I. Arpaci, and S. A. Salloum, “An empirical examination of continuous intention to use m-learning: An integrated model,” Educ. Inf. Technol., 2020.
[73] I. A. Akour, R. S. Al-Maroof, R. Alfaisal, and S. A. Salloum, “A conceptual framework for determining metaverse adoption in higher institutions of gulf area: An empirical study using hybrid SEM-ANN approach,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., p. 100052, 2022.
[74] R. S. Al-Maroof et al., “Acceptance determinants of 5G services,” Int. J. Data Netw. Sci., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 613–628, 2021.
[75] R. S. Al-Maroof et al., “The effectiveness of online platforms after the pandemic: will face-to-face classes affect students’ perception of their Behavioural Intention (BIU) to use online platforms?,” in Informatics, 2021, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 83.
[76] M. Elareshi, M. Habes, E. Youssef, S. A. Salloum, R. Alfaisal, and A. Ziani, “SEM-ANN-based approach to understanding students’ academic-performance adoption of YouTube for learning during Covid,” Heliyon, p. e09236, 2022.
[77] K. Alhumaid et al., “Predicting the Intention to Use Audi and Video Teaching Styles: An Empirical Study with PLS-SEM and Machine Learning Models,” in International Conference on Advanced Machine Learning Technologies and Applications, 2022, pp. 250–264.
[78] R. S. Al-Maroof et al., “Students’ perception towards behavioral intention of audio and video teaching styles: An acceptance study,” Int. J. Data Netw. Sci., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 603, 2022.
[79] R. Alfaisal et al., “PREDICTING THE INTENTION TO USE GOOGLE GLASS IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROJECTS: A HYBRID SEM-ML APPROACH.”
[80] M. V Calcagno, P. J. Barklund, L. Zhao, S. Azzam, S. S. Knoll, and S. Chang, “Semantic analysis system for interpreting linguistic structures output by a natural language linguistic analysis system.” Google Patents, 13-Feb-2007.
[81] F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw, “Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace,” J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., vol. 22, no. 14, pp. 1111–1132, 1992.
[82] S.-H. Liu, H.-L. Liao, and C.-J. Peng, “Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online e-learning users’ acceptance behavior,” E-learning, vol. 4, no. H6, p. H8, 2005.
[83] E. Frank et al., “Weka-a machine learning workbench for data mining,” in Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook, Springer, 2009, pp. 1269–1277.
[84] Y. J. Park and M. Skoric, “Personalized ad in your Google Glass? Wearable technology, hands-off data collection, and new policy imperative,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 142, no. 1, pp. 71–82, 2017.
[85] A. Marakhimov and J. Joo, “Consumer adaptation and infusion of wearable devices for healthcare,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 76, pp. 135–148, 2017.
[86] R. M. Dickey, N. Srikishen, L. I. Lipshultz, P. E. Spiess, R. E. Carrion, and T. S. Hakky, “Augmented reality assisted surgery: a urologic training tool,” Asian J. Androl., vol. 18, no. 5, p. 732, 2016.
