Fusion: Practice and Applications

Journal DOI

https://doi.org/10.54216/FPA

Submit Your Paper

2692-4048ISSN (Online) 2770-0070ISSN (Print)

Volume 21 , Issue 2 , PP: 211-227, 2026 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article

Age and Language Learning a Comparative Study of Young and Adult Learners with Data Fusion Perspectives

Shahab Ahmad Al Maaytah 1 *

  • 1 Associate professor, Department of Languages and Humanities, Applied College, King Faisal University, Alhafof, The Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia - (Salmaaytah@kfu.edu.sa)
  • Doi: https://doi.org/10.54216/FPA.210214

    Received: April 02, 2025 Revised: June 05, 2025 Accepted: August 07, 2025
    Abstract

    This study investigates the influence of age on second language acquisition by comparing language learning outcomes between young learners (aged 8–12) and adult learners (aged 25–40). Drawing on both cognitive and sociolinguistic perspectives, and leveraging data fusion techniques that integrate test results, classroom observations, and learner interviews, the research examines differences in pronunciation, grammar acquisition, vocabulary retention, and communicative competence. The fusion of multiple data modalities ensures a more holistic view of learner performance. Findings indicate that young learners exhibit greater native-like pronunciation and long-term retention, while adult learners outperform in grammatical accuracy and metalinguistic awareness. Motivational factors and learning environments also played significant roles. The study concludes that while age affects specific aspects of language learning, no age group holds a universal advantage. Data fusion-based insights highlight the need for age-sensitive instructional strategies that cater to the cognitive and emotional needs of learners at different stages.

    Keywords :

    Adults , Age influence , Cognitive skills , Communication , Data Fusion , Fluency , Grammar , Learning motivation , Pronunciation , Retention , Vocabulary

    References

    [1]       Z. F. Al-Lami, Z. L. Naser, and M. M. Abdulhasan, "Navigating the prognostics landscape: Deep reinforcement learning-enabled remaining useful life estimation with novel methodology," in Proc. Int. Conf. Communication, Computer Sciences and Engineering (IC3SE), 2024, pp. 520–526. doi: 10.1109/IC3SE62002.2024.10592974.

     

    [2]       S. C. Alexander, J. H. Sun, F. K. Tan, et al., “Daily second-language podcasts support word-form learning,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2023.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02190-1

     

    [3]       L. E. Austin and C. L. Hudson Kam, “Learning a language from inconsistent input: How children outperform adults,” Language Learning and Development, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 121–140, 2022.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2021.1954927

     

    [4]       Berger, C. T. Hill, N. K. Kalashnikova, et al., “Children extract a new linguistic rule more quickly than adults,” Developmental Science, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13498

     

    [5]       E. Bylund, K. Hyltenstam and N. Abrahamsson, “Age of acquisition—not bilingualism—primary determinant of less-than-nativelike L2 ultimate attainment,” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2021.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728920000188

     

    [6]       H. Byeon, R. Nair, V. Mahalakshmi, M. I. Khalaf, B. Kaushik, and M. Shabaz, "Enhancing medical image-based diagnostics through the application of convolutional neural networks techniques," in Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Distributed Computing and Electrical Circuits and Electronics (ICDCECE), Ballari, India, 2024, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ICDCECE60827.2024.10548500.

     

    [7]       C. L. Caldwell-Harris and B. MacWhinney, “The L2 Grammar Fallacy,” Brain and Language, vol. 238, p. 105269, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2023.105269

     

    [8]       R. Foushee, M. H. Goldstein and J. A. Schwade, “Active learning in language development,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 32, no. 2, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214221123920

     

    [9]       R. C. H. Fong, A. Yamashita, M. T. Ullman, et al., “Declarative/procedural memory contributions to second-language learning and retention: A review,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 16, p. 787413, 2022.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.787413

     

    [10]    S. I. Gray, R. Levy, M. Alt, T. P. Hogan and N. Cowan, “Working memory predicts new word learning over and above existing vocabulary and nonverbal IQ,” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 1044–1069, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00397

     

    [11]    J. K. Hartshorne, J. B. Tenenbaum and S. Pinker, “A critical period for second language acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 million English speakers,” Cognition, vol. 177, pp. 263–277, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.007

     

    [12]    M. Hennebry-Leung, “Language learning motivation in diverse educational contexts,” Discover Education, 2024.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-024-00179-8

     

    [13]    K. Immonen, P. Alku and M. S. Peltola, “Phonetic listen-and-repeat training alters 6–7-year-old children’s non-native vowel contrast production after one training session,” Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 95–115, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.21005.imm

     

    [14]    E.-M. Lan, “A comparative study of computer- and mobile-assisted pronunciation training: The case of university students in Taiwan,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 1559–1583, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10647-4

     

    [15]    B. Lee, L. Plonsky and K. Saito, “The effects of perception- vs. production-based pronunciation instruction,” System, vol. 88, p. 102185, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102185

     

    [16]    H.-C. Lin, “A conceptual model of second-language pronunciation in social contexts,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 14, p. 1125157, 2023.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1125157

     

    [17]    Martin, M. A. Nugiel and S. M. Petersen, “Plasticity of the language system in children and adults,” in Handbook of Clinical Neurology, vol. 187, 2022, pp. 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819410-2.00021-7

     

    [18]    W. M. Menks, M. K. Bloechle, C. Hauser, et al., “Developmental changes in brain activation during novel grammar learning across the first three decades of life,” Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 66, p. 101347, 2024.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101347

     

    [19]    C. N. Moreau, M. F. Joanisse, J. Mulgrew and L. J. Batterink, “No statistical learning advantage in children over adults: Evidence from behaviour and neural entrainment,” Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 57, p. 101154, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101154

     

    [20]    M. J. Munro, “Intelligible pronunciation and the learner’s age,” Frontiers in Communication, vol. 6, p. 639398, 2021.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.639398

     

    [21]    R. Nair, M. M. Abdulhasan, H. H. Khalaf, and A. M. Shareef, "A deep learning-based model for mutation rate prediction of COVID-19 using genomic sequences," in Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Image Information Processing (ICIIP), Solan, India, 2023, pp. 759–764. doi: 10.1109/ICIIP61524.2023.10537657.

     

    [22]    C. L. Nagle, “Revisiting perception–production relationships: Exploring a new approach to investigate perception as a time-varying predictor,” Language Learning, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 243–279, 2021.  https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12431

     

    [23]    T. T.-N. Ngo, H. H.-J. Chen and K. K.-W. Lai, “The effectiveness of automatic speech recognition in ESL/EFL pronunciation: A meta-analysis,” ReCALL, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 4–21, 2024.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344023000113

     

    [24]    M. Pikhart and B. Klímová, “Foreign language vocabulary acquisition and retention in print and digital,” Systems, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 30, 2023.  https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11010030

     

    [25]    L. Prela, L. Wiater, M. Horn, et al., “Does age at onset of acquisition predict cross-linguistic phonetic assimilation? A meta-analysis,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 15, p. 1419116, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1419116

     

    [26]    K. Saito, “Age effects in spoken second language vocabulary attainment beyond the critical period,” Studies in Second Language Acquisition, vol. 46, no. 1, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000432

     

    [27]    J. Supriya, "Enhanced EEG artifact removal for epilepsy detection: Integrating CCA, EMD, and DFA-based denoising technique," in Proc. IEEE 4th Int. Conf. ICT in Business, Industry and Government (ICTBIG), 2024. doi: 10.1109/ICTBIG64922.2024.10911564.

     

    [28]    M. F. Teng and D. Zhang, “The associations between working memory and the effects of multimedia input on L2 vocabulary learning,” International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 1021–1049, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021-0130

     

    [29]    R. I. Thomson, “How long can naturalistic L2 pronunciation learning continue?” Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2023 (online). https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2023.2227559

    Cite This Article As :
    Ahmad, Shahab. Age and Language Learning a Comparative Study of Young and Adult Learners with Data Fusion Perspectives. Fusion: Practice and Applications, vol. , no. , 2026, pp. 211-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/FPA.210214
    Ahmad, S. (2026). Age and Language Learning a Comparative Study of Young and Adult Learners with Data Fusion Perspectives. Fusion: Practice and Applications, (), 211-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/FPA.210214
    Ahmad, Shahab. Age and Language Learning a Comparative Study of Young and Adult Learners with Data Fusion Perspectives. Fusion: Practice and Applications , no. (2026): 211-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/FPA.210214
    Ahmad, S. (2026) . Age and Language Learning a Comparative Study of Young and Adult Learners with Data Fusion Perspectives. Fusion: Practice and Applications , () , 211-227 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/FPA.210214
    Ahmad S. [2026]. Age and Language Learning a Comparative Study of Young and Adult Learners with Data Fusion Perspectives. Fusion: Practice and Applications. (): 211-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/FPA.210214
    Ahmad, S. "Age and Language Learning a Comparative Study of Young and Adult Learners with Data Fusion Perspectives," Fusion: Practice and Applications, vol. , no. , pp. 211-227, 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/FPA.210214