Neutrosophic and Information Fusion

Submit Your Paper

2836-7863ISSN (Online)

Volume 6 , Issue 1 , PP: 21–33, 2026 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article

Neutrosophic Information Fusion: Foundations, Frameworks, Algorithms, and Research Frontiers

Agnes Osagie 1 * , Mohammad Abobala 2

  • 1 Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Faculty of Applied Science, South Africa - (Osagieagne2000@cput.ac.za)
  • 2 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Tishreen University, Syria - (mohammadabobala777@gmail.com)
  • Doi: https://doi.org/10.54216/NIF.060103

    Received: July 07, 2025 Accepted: September 21, 2025
    Abstract

    Neutrosophic set theory, which explicitly models truth (T ), indeterminacy (I), and falsity (F) as independent membership components, has emerged as one of the most active mathematical frameworks for uncertain information fusion over the 2020–2025 period. This comprehensive survey reviews, synthesises, and critically analyses more than 200 research contributions spanning single-valued neutrosophic sets (SVNS), interval neutrosophic sets (INS), neutrosophic cubic sets (NCS), neutrosophic Z-numbers, linguistic neutrosophic sets, and their integration with Dempster-Shafer evidence theory. We organise the literature across four interlocking axes— mathematical foundations, aggregation operators, information measures, and decision-support methods—and map these onto seven application domains including medical diagnosis, supply chain management, environmental assessment, and engineering fault diagnosis. Three representative algorithms are formally presented with pseudocode, complexity analysis, and mathematical justifications: (i) the SVNWA entropy weighted aggregation framework, (ii) the Neutrosophic Dempster-Shafer Evidence Theory (N-DSET) fusion pipeline with conflict r edistribution, a nd (iii) the Neutrosophic TOPSIS multi-criteria d ecision-making a lgorithm. A comparative performance analysis shows that neutrosophic methods achieve mean AUC improvements of +4.2% to +7.1% over intuitionistic fuzzy set baselines across reported experimental studies. Six precisely formulated open problems are identified, and a five-horizon research roadmap from 2025 to 2030 is proposed, covering mathematical completeness, computational scalability, hybrid deep-learning architectures, domain expansion to quantum and large language model settings, and the long-term vision of a unified neutrosophic information quality standard.

    Keywords :

    Neutrosophic sets , Information fusion , Aggregation operators , Dempster-Shafer theory , MCDM , Uncertainty quantification , Survey , Research directions

    References

    [1] Atanassov, K. T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), 87–96. doi: 10.1016/S0165 0114(86)80034 -3

     

    [2] Chai, J. S., Selvachandran, G., Smarandache, F., Gerogiannis, V. C., Son, L. H., Bui, Q.-T., & Vo, B. (2021). New similarity measures for single-valued neutrosophic sets with applications in pattern recognition and medical diagnosis problems. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 7(2), 703–723. doi: 10.1007/s40747-020-00220-w

     

    [3] Du, S., Ye, J., Yong, R., & Zhang, F. (2021). Some aggregation operators of neutrosophic Z-numbers and their multicriteria decision making method. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 7(1), 429–438. doi: 10.1007/s40747-020-00204-w

     

    [4] European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union, L119/1.

     

    [5] Garg, H., & Nancy. (2020). Linguistic single-valued neutrosophic power aggregation operators and their applications to group decision-making problems. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 7(2), 546–558. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2019.1911522

     

    [6] Lu, Z., & Ye, J. (2017). Cosine measures of neutrosophic cubic sets for multiple attribute decision-making. Symmetry, 9(7), 121. doi: 10.3390/sym9070121

     

    [7] Peng, X., & Dai, J. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of neutrosophic set: two decades review from 1998 to 2017. Artificial Intelligence Review, 53(1), 199–255. doi: 10.1007/s10462-018-9652-0

     

    [8] Qin, M., Tang, Y., & Wen, J. (2020). An improved total uncertainty measure in the evidence theory and its application in decision making. Entropy, 22(4), 487. doi: 10.3390/e22040487

     

    [9] Smarandache, F. (1998). Neutrosophy: Neutrosophic probability, set, and logic. Rehoboth, NM: American Research Press.

     

    [10] Wang, H., Smarandache, F., Zhang, Y., & Sunderraman, R. (2010). Single valued neutrosophic sets. Multispace and Multistructure, 4, 410–413.

     

    [11] Wang, H., Smarandache, F., Zhang, Y.-Q., & Sunderraman, R. (2005). Interval neutrosophic sets and logic: Theory and applications in computing. Hexis.

     

    [12] Xiao, F. (2023). GEJS: A generalized evidential divergence measure for multisource information fusion. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 53(4), 2246–2258. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2022.3219498

     

    [13] Ye, J., Du, S., & Yong, R. (2022). Aczel-Alsina weighted aggregation operators of neutrosophic Z-numbers and their multiple attribute decision-making method. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 24(5), 2397–2410. doi: 10.1007/ s40815-022-01289-w

     

    [14] Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353. doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X

     

    [15] Zhang, Z., Wang, H., Zhang, J., & Jiang, W. (2023). A new correlation measure for belief functions and their application in data fusion. Entropy, 25(6), 925. doi: 10.3390/e25060925

    Cite This Article As :
    Osagie, Agnes. , Abobala, Mohammad. Neutrosophic Information Fusion: Foundations, Frameworks, Algorithms, and Research Frontiers. Neutrosophic and Information Fusion, vol. , no. , 2026, pp. 21–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/NIF.060103
    Osagie, A. Abobala, M. (2026). Neutrosophic Information Fusion: Foundations, Frameworks, Algorithms, and Research Frontiers. Neutrosophic and Information Fusion, (), 21–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/NIF.060103
    Osagie, Agnes. Abobala, Mohammad. Neutrosophic Information Fusion: Foundations, Frameworks, Algorithms, and Research Frontiers. Neutrosophic and Information Fusion , no. (2026): 21–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/NIF.060103
    Osagie, A. , Abobala, M. (2026) . Neutrosophic Information Fusion: Foundations, Frameworks, Algorithms, and Research Frontiers. Neutrosophic and Information Fusion , () , 21–33 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/NIF.060103
    Osagie A. , Abobala M. [2026]. Neutrosophic Information Fusion: Foundations, Frameworks, Algorithms, and Research Frontiers. Neutrosophic and Information Fusion. (): 21–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/NIF.060103
    Osagie, A. Abobala, M. "Neutrosophic Information Fusion: Foundations, Frameworks, Algorithms, and Research Frontiers," Neutrosophic and Information Fusion, vol. , no. , pp. 21–33, 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/NIF.060103