2692-4048ISSN (Online)
2770-0070ISSN (Print)
Volume 20 , Issue 1 , PP: 01-11, 2025 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article
Rimma Yunusova 1 * , Roman Pantin 2
Doi: https://doi.org/10.54216/FPA.200101
This study delves into the relationship between cyber-physical systems (CPS) and economic security, with particular emphasis on how networking technologies facilitate more efficient data integration. It investigates how CPS adoption is reshaping national economies by influencing productivity levels, altering labor market structures, and introducing new cybersecurity challenges. Employing a hybrid research design that merges cross-sectional data evaluation with expert consultations, the research offers a comprehensive view of the implications of CPS implementation on sectoral productivity, employment trends, and macroeconomic resilience.CPS are positioned in the study as strategic innovations powered by data intelligence, underlining both their promising opportunities and associated threats. The findings support the development of informed policy measures that aim to enhance benefits while reducing potential risks. Ultimately, the work contributes to the evolving discourse on CPS by offering a balanced analysis of their socio-economic impacts and outlining actionable recommendations for decision-makers and industry stakeholders to capitalize on CPS innovations effectively.
Cyber-Physical Systems , Economic Security , Labor Market Dynamics , Cybersecurity , 5G Net-work Optimization , Public-Private Innovation Hubs
[1] Y. Ashibani and Q. Mahmoud, “Cyber physical systems security: Analysis, challenges and solutions,” Comput. Secur., vol. 68, pp. 81–97, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2017.04.005
[2] A. Sh. Durmanov et al., “Accounting for Organizational and Economic Mechanisms in Greenhouse Activities,” WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, vol. 20, pp. 242–255, 2024. https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2024.20.25
[3] A. Fournaris et al., “Design and Run-Time Aspects of Secure Cyber-Physical Systems,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 357–382, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25312-7-13
[4] M. Hermann et al., “Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios,” in 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 3928–3937, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.488
[5] T. S. Zhang and L. H. Chen, “Integrating FinTech and Green Finance: A Review of Current Trends and Future Directions,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 18, p. 7621, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187621
[6] N. Jazdi, “Cyber physical systems in the context of Industry 4.0,” in 2014 IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics, pp. 1–4, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/AQTR.2014.6857843
[7] N. Y. Kim et al., “A Survey on Cyber Physical System Security for IoT: Issues, Challenges, Threats, Solutions,” J. Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 14, pp. 1361–1384, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3745/JIPS.03.0105
[8] A. Kumar, “Cyber Physical Systems (CPSs) – Opportunities and Challenges for Improving Cyber Security,” International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 137, pp. 19–27, 2016. https://doi.org/10.5120/IJCA2016908877
[9] P. Lis and J. Mendel, “Cyberattacks on critical infrastructure: An economic perspective,” Economics and Business Review, vol. 5, pp. 24–47, 2019. https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2019.2.2
[10] Z. Liu et al., “Constrained Variational Policy Optimization for Safe Reinforcement Learning,” ArXiv, abs/2201.11927, 2022. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.11927
[11] K. Ly et al., “Emerging challenges in cyber-physical systems: A balance of performance, correctness, and security,” in 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), pp. 498–502, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFCOMW.2016.7562128
[12] M. Moghaddam and A. Deshmukh, “Resilience of cyber-physical manufacturing control systems,” Manufacturing Letters, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MFGLET.2019.05.002
[13] V. V. Muthuswamy and R. Yunusova, “Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Bankruptcy Financial Risks: Moderating Role of Corporate Governance Index,” Cuadernos de Economia, vol. 46, no. 132, pp. 69–78, 2023. https://doi.org/10.32826/cude.v46i132.1207
[14] H. Nguyen et al., “Apprenticeship Learning for Continuous State Spaces and Actions in a Swarm-Guidance Shepherding Task,” in 2019 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI), pp. 102–109, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSCI44817.2019.9002756
[15] R. Pantin, “Developing a Dynamic Decision-Support Framework for Higher Education Management Systems through Real-time Information Extraction,” ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 497–502, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1145/3644713.3644786
[16] H. Ravichandar et al., “Recent Advances in Robot Learning from Demonstration,” Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, vol. 3, pp. 297–330, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-control-100819-063206
[17] M. Segovia-Ferreira et al., “Cyber-Resilience Approaches for Cyber-Physical Systems,” ArXiv, abs/2302.05402, 2023. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.05402
[18] R. Patel and S. Kumar, “Smart Manufacturing and Cyber-Physical Systems: A Review of Recent Developments,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 58, pp. 123–139, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.09.012
[19] Y. Soupionis et al., “Cyber security impact on power grid including nuclear plant,” in 2016 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), pp. 767–773, 2016. https://doi.org/10.15439/2016F164
[20] M. Khakimova et al., “Neuroscientific Discoveries and Their Implications for Early Childhood Language Education,” Forum for Linguistic Studies, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 656–668, 2025. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i3.8446
[21] J. A. Smith and L. M. Johnson, “Blockchain Technology and Its Impact on Economic Security: A Comprehensive Review,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 45–62, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.2024.0023
