Volume 17 , Issue 2 , PP: 232-248, 2025 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article
Walaa Fouda 1 * , Najla M. Alnaqbi 2 , Sanjar Mirzaliev 3 , Dina Sabry Said 4
Doi: https://doi.org/10.54216/FPA.170218
In the realm of education, understanding the impact of different teaching styles on student engagement and satisfaction is essential. Recent advancements in sentiment analysis provide new avenues for evaluating student feedback, particularly through informal channels such as social media. While formal student evaluations offer structured feedback on teaching styles, they may not fully capture the nuanced opinions and sentiments expressed by students in informal settings, such as social media. This research aims to address the gap by integrating sentiment analysis of social media data to evaluate teaching effectiveness across various styles and comparing it with formal evaluation results. This study employs sentiment analysis using the VADER (Valence Aware Dictionary and sEntiment Reasoner) tool to analyze student posts on social media platforms. The analysis includes the extraction of sentiment distributions, identification of common keywords, and tracking of sentiment trends over time. Additionally, formal student evaluations (Likert scale) are collected to offer a direct comparison. The teaching styles analyzed include lecture-based teaching, project-based learning, flipped classrooms, online learning, hybrid learning, and traditional exam-based learning. The findings demonstrate that student sentiment varies significantly across teaching styles. Flipped classrooms and project-based learning received the highest positive sentiment scores, while traditional exam-based teaching showed the most negative sentiment. Social media feedback tended to align with formal evaluations for certain teaching styles, such as the flipped classroom and hybrid learning but showed divergence in others, like online learning, which received higher sentiment in social media feedback. Trends over time reveal evolving sentiments, with fluctuating satisfaction as the academic semester progressed. The integration of social media sentiment analysis provides a more dynamic and real-time understanding of student experiences, offering deeper insights into teaching style effectiveness.
Social media analysis , Student Evaluation , Teaching styles , Sentiment analysis , VADER , Educational feedback
[1] Whiteside, A.L., Dikkers, A.G. and Swan, K. eds., 2023. Social presence in online learning: Multiple perspectives on practice and research. Taylor & Francis.
[2] Tess, P.A., 2013. The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual)–A literature review. Computers in human behavior, 29(5), pp. A60-A68.
[3] Elbagir, S. and Yang, J., 2019, March. Twitter sentiment analysis using natural language toolkit and VADER sentiment. In Proceedings of the international multiconference of engineers and computer scientists (Vol. 122, No. 16). sn.
[4] Cone, L., Brøgger, K., Berghmans, M., Decuypere, M., Förschler, A., Grimaldi, E., Hartong, S., Hillman, T., Ideland, M., Landri, P. and van de Oudeweetering, K., 2022. Pandemic Acceleration: Covid-19 and the emergency digitalization of European education. European Educational Research Journal, 21(5), pp.845-868.
[5] Daly, A.J., Moolenaar, N.M., Bolivar, J.M. and Burke, P., 2010. Relationships in reform: The role of teachers' social networks. Journal of educational administration, 48(3), pp.359-391.
[6] Marzano, R.J., Pickering, D. and McTighe, J., 1993. Assessing student outcomes: Performance assessment using the dimensions of learning model. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1250 N. Pitt St., Alexandria, VA 22314 (Stock Number 611-93179, $13.95).
[7] Mujahid, M., Lee, E., Rustam, F., Washington, P.B., Ullah, S., Reshi, A.A. and Ashraf, I., 2021. Sentiment analysis and topic modeling on tweets about online education during COVID-19. Applied Sciences, 11(18), p.8438.
[8] Darling-Hammond, L., Friedlaender, D. and Snyder, J., 2014. Student-centered schools: Policy supports for closing the opportunity gap. Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education, pp.1-12.
[9] Marshall, K., 2013. Rethinking teacher supervision and evaluation: How to work smart, build collaboration, and close the achievement gap. John Wiley & Sons. [10] Bennett, R.E., 2011. Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in education: principles, policy & practice, 18(1), pp.5-25.
[11] Ortigosa, A., Martín, J.M. and Carro, R.M., 2014. Sentiment analysis in Facebook and its application to e-learning. Computers in human behavior, 31, pp.527-541.
[12] Doyle, T., 2023. Helping students learn in a learner-centered environment: A guide to facilitating learning in higher education. Taylor & Francis.
[13] Tishkovskaya, S. and Lancaster, G.A., 2012. Statistical education in the 21st century: A review of challenges, teaching innovations and strategies for reform. Journal of Statistics Education, 20(2).
[14] Alnaqbi NM, Fouda W. Exploring the role of ChatGPT and social media in enhancing student evaluation of teaching styles in higher education using neutrosophic sets. International Journal of Neutrosophic Science. 2023;20(4):181-90.
[15] Al Kharusi I. Students’ Evaluation of Teaching (SET) for Improving Learning and Teaching Quality in HE: Students’ and Teachers’ Perspectives. Journal of World Englishes and Educational Practices. 2023 Dec 4;5(3):93-103.
[16] Keerthigha C, Singh S. The effect of teaching style and academic motivation on student evaluation of teaching: Insights from social cognition. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023 Jan 19;13:1107375.
[17] Ajmal M, Basit I, Sadaf S. Evaluating the Role of Students’ Feedback in Enhancing Teaching Effectiveness. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2024 May 27;12(2):1492-9.
[18] Oletti BL. Board 79: Leveraging Learning Styles for Enhanced Student Outcomes: A Study at a New York University. In2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition 2024 Jun 23.
[19] Ahmed S, Zaki A, Bentley Y. Automated Evaluation Techniques and AI-Enhanced Methods. InUtilizing AI for Assessment, Grading, and Feedback in Higher Education 2024 (pp. 1-27). IGI Global.
[20] Neu S, Liu J. Utilizing Multiple Teaching Styles to Enhance Student Learning. Strategies. 2023 Nov 2;36(6):30-3.
[21] Byrne N, Cowley H, Speight S. How in-class electronic collection of student evaluations is providing teachers and managers with better information for the development of teaching. InEDULEARN19 Proceedings 2019 (pp. 755-764). IATED.
[22] Dimitriadou E, Lanitis A. An integrated framework for developing and evaluating an automated lecture style assessment system. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.00201. 2023 Nov 30.
[23] Bhagat BP, Dhande-Dandge SS. A Literature Review on Sentiment Analysis Using Machine Learning in Education Domain. InProceedings of 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Advances and Applications: ICAIAA 2022 2023 Apr 15 (pp. 191-207). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
[24] Peña-Torres JA. Towards an improved of teaching practice using Sentiment Analysis in Student Evaluation. Ingeniería y Competitividad. 2024 Jun 20;26(2).
[25] Sweta S. The Transformative Role of Sentiment Analysis in Education. InSentiment Analysis and its Application in Educational Data Mining 2024 Apr 21 (pp. 47-60). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
[26] Fan X, Zhang J, Yang M. A sentiment analysis model for electroencephalogram signals of students in universities using a convolutional neural network and support vector machine models. Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology. 2023 Nov 13;23(09):2340086.
[27] Alkhodair SA. A SENTIMENT ANALYSIS-BASED SMARTPHONE APPLICATION TO CONTINUOUSLY ASSESS STUDENTS’FEEDBACK AND MONITOR THE QUALITY OF COURSES AND THE LEARNING EXPERIENCE IN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS. IJAEDU-International E-Journal of Advances in Education. 2023 May 4;9(25):15-26.
[28] Alkhodair SA. A SENTIMENT ANALYSIS-BASED SMARTPHONE APPLICATION TO CONTINUOUSLY ASSESS STUDENTS’FEEDBACK AND MONITOR THE QUALITY OF COURSES AND THE LEARNING EXPERIENCE IN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS. IJAEDU-International E-Journal of Advances in Education. 2023 May 4;9(25):15-26. [29] Bhagat BP, Dhande-Dandge SS. A Comparison of Different Machine Learning Techniques for Sentiment Analysis in Education Domain. InInternational Conference on Communications and Cyber Physical Engineering 2018 2023 Mar 10 (pp. 441-450). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
[30] Jimmy J, Prasetyo VR. Sentiment analysis on feedback of higher education teaching conduct: An empirical evaluation of methods. InAIP Conference Proceedings 2022 Apr 25 (Vol. 2470, No. 1). AIP Publishing.
[31] Sweta S. Sentiment Tech: Exploring the Tools Shaping Emotional Analysis. InSentiment Analysis and its Application in Educational Data Mining 2024 Apr 21 (pp. 61-78). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
[32] Spatiotis N, Perikos I, Mporas I, Paraskevas M. Sentiment analysis of teachers using social information in educational platform environments. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools. 2020 Mar 31;29(02):2040004.
[33] Chandrasekaran S, Dutt V, Vyas N, Kumar R. Student Sentiment Analysis Using Various Machine Learning Techniques. In2023 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Smart Communication (AISC) 2023 Jan 27 (pp. 104-107). IEEE.
[34] Mite-Baidal K, Delgado-Vera C, Solís-Avilés E, Espinoza AH, Ortiz-Zambrano J, Varela-Tapia E. Sentiment analysis in education domain: A systematic literature review. InInternational conference on technologies and innovation 2018 Oct 2 (pp. 285-297). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
[35] Menaha R, Dhanaranjani R, Rajalakshmi T, Yogarubini R. Student feedback mining system using sentiment analysis. IJCATR. 2017; 6:1-69.
[36] Tian X, Tang S, Zhu H, Xia D. Real‐time sentiment analysis of students based on mini‐Xception architecture for wisdom classroom. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience. 2022 Sep 25;34(21): e7059.
[37] Efuwape TO, Abioye TE, Abdullah AK. Text Analytics of Opinion-Poll On Adoption of Digital Collaborative Tools for Academic Planning using Vader-Based Lexicon Sentiment Analysis. FUDMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCES. 2022 Mar 31;6(1):152-9.