Volume 20 , Issue 4 , PP: 181-191, 2023 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article
Najla M. Alnaqbi 1 * , Walaa Fouda 2
Doi: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.200414
This paper provides an in-depth analysis of how Chat GPT and social media can be used as tools for capturing real-time student feedback on teaching styles in higher education. The study employs neutrosophic sets to deal with the uncertainties and ambiguities that arise in student evaluation data. Traditional methods of evaluating teaching styles in higher education, such as paper-based surveys, may not fully capture the nuanced experiences of students in the classroom. Recent advancements in chatbots, such as ChatGPT, and the growing use of social media platforms offer new opportunities for more efficient and effective methods of evaluating teaching styles. However, there are significant challenges in using these technologies, including the handling of indeterminate and uncertain data. Neutrosophic sets provide a mathematical framework for handling ambiguity and uncertainty in data and can be used to better capture the complex and multifaceted aspects of student experiences in the classroom. Additionally, the use of chatbots and social media platforms raises practical and ethical concerns that must be addressed in the evaluation process. This study aims to explore the role of ChatGPT and social media in enhancing student evaluation of teaching styles in higher education using neutrosophic sets, while also addressing the practical and ethical challenges that arise from their use.
Neutrosophic Sets , AHP , Uncertainty , Education , Chat GPT
[1] M. Shidiq, “THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-BASED CHAT-GPT AND ITS CHALLENGES FOR THE WORLD OF EDUCATION; FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF CREATIVE WRITING SKILLS,” in PROCEEDING OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION, SOCIETY AND HUMANITY, 2023, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 360–364.
[2] K. Draganic, “Artificial intelligence: Opportunities and challenges in NP education,” The Nurse Practitioner, vol. 48, no. 4, p. 6, 2023.
[3] N. Al-Qaysi, N. Mohamad-Nordin, and M. Al-Emran, “A systematic review of social media acceptance from the perspective of educational and information systems theories and models,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 2085–2109, 2020.
[4] A. E. E. Sobaih, A. M. Hasanein, and A. E. Abu Elnasr, “Responses to COVID-19 in higher education: Social media usage for sustaining formal academic communication in developing countries,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 16, p. 6520, 2020.
[5] D. G. Krutka, S. Manca, S. M. Galvin, C. Greenhow, M. J. Koehler, and E. Askari, “Teaching ‘against’ social media: Confronting problems of profit in the curriculum,” Teachers College Record, vol. 121, no. 14, pp. 1–42, 2019.
[6] H. Cho, J. Cannon, R. Lopez, and W. Li, “Social media literacy: A conceptual framework,” New media & society, p. 14614448211068530, 2022.
[7] A. Gilson et al., “How does CHATGPT perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination? the implications of large language models for medical education and knowledge assessment,” JMIR Medical Education, vol. 9, no. 1, p. e45312, 2023.
[8] B. D. Lund and T. Wang, “Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries?,” Library Hi Tech News, 2023.
[9] J. S. Barrot, “Scientific mapping of social media in education: A decade of exponential growth,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 645–668, 2021.
[10] A. Al-Azawei, “What Drives Successful Social Media in Education and E-Learning? A Comparative Study on Facebook and Moodle.,” Journal of Information Technology Education, vol. 18, 2019.
[11] M. S. Marquart and L. Goldkind, “ChatGPT: Implications for social work education and practice,” 2023.
[12] R. A. Khan, M. Jawaid, A. R. Khan, and M. Sajjad, “ChatGPT-Reshaping medical education and clinical management,” Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 39, no. 2, 2023.
[13] H. Karimi, T. Derr, K. T. Torphy, K. A. Frank, and J. Tang, “A roadmap for incorporating online social media in educational research,” Teachers College Record, vol. 121, no. 14, pp. 1–24, 2019.
[14] R. Chugh, R. Grose, and S. A. Macht, “Social media usage by higher education academics: A scoping review of the literature,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 26, pp. 983–999, 2021.
[15] A. A. Salamai, “Neutrosophic-based machine learning context for the trustworthiness of devices in the internet of things,” Journal of Neutrosophic and Fuzzy Systems, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 59, 2023.
[16] A. Karasan, E. Ilbahar, S. Cebi, and C. Kahraman, “Customer–oriented product design using an integrated neutrosophic AHP & DEMATEL & QFD methodology,” Applied Soft Computing, p. 108445, 2022.
[17] A. Vafadarnikjoo, H. Badri Ahmadi, J. J. H. Liou, T. Botelho, and K. Chalvatzis, “Analyzing blockchain adoption barriers in manufacturing supply chains by the neutrosophic analytic hierarchy process,” Annals of Operations Research, pp. 1–28, 2021.
[18] R. Atassi and K. Yang, “An integrated neutrosophic AHP and TOPSIS methods for assessment renewable energy barriers for sustainable development,” International Journal of Neutrosophic Science, vol. 18, no. 2, p. 157, 2022.
[19] B. Y. Kavus, P. G. Tas, E. Ayyildiz, and A. Taskin, “A three-level framework to evaluate airline service quality based on interval valued neutrosophic AHP considering the new dimensions,” Journal of Air Transport Management, vol. 99, p. 102179, 2022.
[20] A. A. Salamai, “An integrated neutrosophic SWARA and VIKOR method for ranking risks of green supply chain,” Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, vol. 41, pp. 113–125, 2021.
[21] I. Mamites et al., “Factors Influencing Teaching Quality in Universities: Analyzing Causal Relationships Based on Neutrosophic DEMATEL,” Education Research International, vol. 2022, 2022.
[22] H. Yilmaz, S. Karadayi-Usta, and S. Yanık, “A novel neutrosophic AHP-Copeland approach for distance education: towards sustainability,” Interactive Learning Environments, pp. 1–23, 2022.
[23] A. Tack and C. Piech, “The AI Teacher test: Measuring the pedagogical ability of Blender and GPT-3 in educational dialogues,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.07540, 2022.
[24] H. Tkacová, R. Králik, M. Tvrdoň, Z. Jenisová, and J. G. Martin, “Credibility and Involvement of Social Media in Education—Recommendations for Mitigating the Negative Effects of the Pandemic among High School Students,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, no. 5, p. 2767, 2022.
[25] M. Yucesan and M. Gul, “Failure modes and effects analysis based on neutrosophic analytic hierarchy process: method and application,” Soft Computing, vol. 25, no. 16, pp. 11035–11052, 2021.
[26] P. Gulum, E. Ayyildiz, and A. T. Gumus, “A two level interval valued neutrosophic AHP integrated TOPSIS methodology for post-earthquake fire risk assessment: An application for Istanbul,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 61, p. 102330, 2021.
[27] M. Abdel-Basset and M. Mohamed, “Multicriteria group decision making based on neutrosophic analytic hierarchy process: Suggested modifications,” Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, Vol. 43, 2021, p. 246, 2021.
