2692-2967ISSN (Online)
2770-0216ISSN (Print)
Volume 0 , Issue 1 , PP: 55-65, 2019 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article
Irina V. Pustokhina 1 * , Denis A. Pustokhin 2
Subterranean infrastructure excavation necessitates stringent safety assessment methodologies due to its complex nature. This study addresses this imperative by presenting an integrated framework based on the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) technique. This methodology amalgamates multi-source information fusion and DEMATEL-driven multi-criteria decision-making techniques. The approach evaluates safety parameters within subterranean infrastructure excavation by synthesizing expert insights, on-site measured data, and predefined criteria. Through a systematic construction of judgment matrices, our approach offers a standardized means to assess observed values against established safety benchmarks. The collaborative synthesis of expert assessments and empirical data not only informs the comprehensive relation matrix, highlighting intricate interdependencies among key factors but also fosters a structured pathway for evaluating safety. This integrated methodology, adaptable across diverse excavation scenarios, equips stakeholders with a holistic understanding of safety factors within subterranean construction. Facilitating informed decision-making, enables the optimization of safety protocols and interventions, thereby enhancing overall safety standards within such critical infrastructure projects.
Subterranean infrastructure , safety assessment , Multi-source Information , multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) , Integrated information synthesis , Safety management.
[1] Rao, Congjun, Xinping Xiao, Ming Xie, Mark Goh, and Junjun Zheng. 2017. “Low Carbon Supplier Selection under Multi-Source and Multi-Attribute Procurement.” Journal of Intelligent \& Fuzzy Systems 32 (6): 4009–22.
[2] Sodenkamp, Mariya A, Madjid Tavana, and Debora Di Caprio. 2018. “An Aggregation Method for Solving Group Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Problems with Single-Valued Neutrosophic Sets.” Applied Soft Computing 71: 715–27.
[3] Jiao, Yuliang, and Yi Xiao Lian’e Li. n.d. “Comparison Method of Multi-Source Data Fusion Based on Fuzzy Evidence Theory.”
[4] Zhang, Limao, Lieyun Ding, Xianguo Wu, and Miroslaw J Skibniewski. 2017. “An Improved Dempster--Shafer Approach to Construction Safety Risk Perception.” Knowledge-Based Systems 132: 30–46.
[5] Liang, Zhenyu, Li Liang, Yuze Cai, and Alessandro Bertoni. 2019. “The Influence Factors of the Stability of Tailings Dam Based on Multi-Source Information Fusion Method.” Journal of Intelligent \& Fuzzy Systems 37 (3): 3365–72.
[6] Lila, Reni Bibriven. 2018. “Landslide Hazard Modeling in Ventura and Santa Barbara Counties, California Using Multi-Tiered Geospatial Data Analysis.”
[7] Mir, Usama, Ubaid Abbasi, Yang Yang, Zeeshan Ahmed Bhatti, and Talha Mir. 2018. “Spatial Big Data and Moving Objects: A Comprehensive Survey.” IEEE Access 6: 58835–57.
[8] Peng, Yi, Yong Zhang, Yu Tang, and Shiming Li. 2011. “An Incident Information Management Framework Based on Data Integration, Data Mining, and Multi-Criteria Decision Making.” Decision Support Systems 51 (2): 316–27.
[9] Catalina, Tiberiu, Joseph Virgone, and Eric Blanco. 2011. “Multi-Source Energy Systems Analysis Using a Multi-Criteria Decision Aid Methodology.” Renewable Energy 36 (8): 2245–52.
[10] Danielson, Patrick, Limin Yang, Suming Jin, Collin Homer, and Darrell Napton. 2016. “An Assessment of the Cultivated Cropland Class of NLCD 2006 Using a Multi-Source and Multi-Criteria Approach.” Remote Sensing 8 (2): 101.
[11] Danumah, Jean Homian, Samuel Nii Odai, Bachir Mahaman Saley, Joerg Szarzynski, Michael Thiel, Adjei Kwaku, Fernand Koffi Kouame, and Lucette You Akpa. 2016. “Flood Risk Assessment and Mapping in Abidjan District Using Multi-Criteria Analysis (AHP) Model and Geoinformation Techniques,(Cote d’ivoire).” Geoenvironmental Disasters 3: 1–13.
[12] Stein, Eric W. 2013. “A Comprehensive Multi-Criteria Model to Rank Electric Energy Production Technologies.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 22: 640–54.
[13] Li, Wenxiang, Ye Li, Jing Fan, and Haopeng Deng. 2017. “Siting of Carsharing Stations Based on Spatial Multi-Criteria Evaluation: A Case Study of Shanghai EVCARD.” Sustainability 9 (1): 152.
[14] Wen, Zhu, Ziming Xiong, Hao Lu, and Yuanpu Xia. 2019. “Optimisation of Treatment Scheme for Water Inrush Disaster in Tunnels Based on Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making in an Uncertain Environment.” Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 44: 8249–63.
[15] Halepoto, Irfan Ahmed, Anwar Ali Sahito, Muhammad Aslam Uqaili, Bhawani Shankar Chowdhry, and Tahir Riaz. 2015. “Multi-Criteria Assessment of Smart City Transformation Based on SWOT Analysis.” In 2015 5th National Symposium on Information Technology: Towards New Smart World (NSITNSW), 1–6.
[16] Wang, Shaoyi, Zhongjie Sheng, Yuliang Xi, Xiangyuan Ma, Huihui Zhang, Mengjun Kang, Fu Ren, Qingyun Du, Ke Hu, and Zhenbiao Han. 2018. “The Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and a New Correlation Algorithm to Urban Construction and Supervision Using Multi-Source Government Data in Tianjin.” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 7 (2): 50.
[17] Xu, Weihua, and Jianhang Yu. 2017. “A Novel Approach to Information Fusion in Multi-Source Datasets: A Granular Computing Viewpoint.” Information Sciences 378: 410–23.
[18] Mariappan, S, R Roslee, and K Sharir. 2019. “Flood Susceptibility Analysis (FSAn) Using Multi-Criteria Evaluation (MCE) Technique for Landuse Planning: A Case from Penampang, Sabah, Malaysia.” In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1358:12067.
[19] Zhou, Jianli, Yunna Wu, Chenghao Wu, Zhongqing Deng, Chuanbo Xu, and Yong Hu. 2019. “A Hybrid Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Performance Analysis and Evaluation of Park-Level Integrated Energy System.” Energy Conversion and Management 201: 112134.
[20] Yu, Hao, and Wei Deng Solvang. 2016. “A Stochastic Programming Approach with Improved Multi-Criteria Scenario-Based Solution Method for Sustainable Reverse Logistics Design of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE).” Sustainability 8 (12): 1331.
[21] Meenakshi, G. 2012. “Multi Source Feedback Based Performance Appraisal System Using Fuzzy Logic Decision Support System.” ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1203.1882.
[22] Ribeiro, Rita A, Antonio Falcao, Andre Mora, and Jose M Fonseca. 2014. “FIF: A Fuzzy Information Fusion Algorithm Based on Multi-Criteria Decision Making.” Knowledge-Based Systems 58: 23–32.
[23] Khameneh, Azadeh Zahedi, Adem K\il\içman, and Abdul Razak Salleh. 2017. “An Adjustable Approach to Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Based on a Preference Relationship under Fuzzy Soft Information.” International Journal of Fuzzy Systems 19: 1840–65.
[24] Seddiki, Mohammed, and Amar Bennadji. 2019. “Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Renewable Energy Alternatives for Electricity Generation in a Residential Building.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 110: 101–17.
[25] Li, Mengmeng, and Xiaoyan Zhang. 2017. “Information Fusion in a Multi-Source Incomplete Information System Based on Information Entropy.” Entropy 19 (11): 570.
[26] Georgiou, Dimitris, Essam Sh Mohammed, and Stelios Rozakis. 2015. “Multi-Criteria Decision Making on the Energy Supply Configuration of Autonomous Desalination Units.” Renewable Energy 75: 459–67.
[27] Zhang, Lei, Yanzhang Wang, and Xuanyi Zhao. 2018. “A New Emergency Decision Support Methodology Based on Multi-Source Knowledge in 2-Tuple Linguistic Model.” Knowledge-Based Systems 144: 77–87.
[28] Yager, Ronald R, and Fred Petry. 2016. “An Intelligent Quality-Based Approach to Fusing Multi-Source Probabilistic Information.” Information Fusion 31: 127–36.
[29] Singh, Laishram Kanta, Madan K Jha, and V M Chowdary. 2017. “Multi-Criteria Analysis and GIS Modeling for Identifying Prospective Water Harvesting and Artificial Recharge Sites for Sustainable Water Supply.” Journal of Cleaner Production 142: 1436–56.
Choi, Wonik, Ling Liu, and Boseon Yu. 2012. “Multi-Criteria Decision Making with Skyline Computation.” In 2012 IEEE 13th International Conference on Information Reuse \& Integration
