1
Information Systems Department Faculty of Computers and Information Sciences Mansoura University, Egypt
(nadaadel@mans.edu.eg)
2
Information Systems Department Faculty of Computers and Informatics Zagazig University, Egypt
(AlshaimaaTantawy@zu.edu.eg)
Abstract :
The blockchain as a distributed ledger with flourishing blocks are secured and linked with cryptographic hashes. The blockchain is a type of distributed database that is used in many vital business transactions of replication, sharing, tracking, synchronization data among various sites. Recently, the global technological and industrial revolution is accelerating, the bitcoin extends the industrial revolution to become a lot of interest from both the business world and academic circles. This paper aims to take the advantages of blockchain concepts to be applied in Enterprise Banking Systems (EBS). The EBS depend on smart contract and blockchain technologies for trust only the installation of a blockchain platform with a solid design and a proven user base. Unfortunately, only a few blockchain platforms (BP) have achieved stable design and confident implementation. The selection of appropriate BP is leading step for decision makers that pretended to be a real challenge. Therefore, any digital transformation project that makes use of blockchain must contend with the difficulty of selecting a BP that is suited to the requirements of EBS. In this study, a hybrid approach of a neutrosophic theory for uncertainty conditions in a multi-criteria decision-making problem with the use wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) and Weighted Sum Method (WSM) to select the appropriate and efficient BP. A case study is applied on EBS, as an uncertain environment, to show the efficiency for the proposed model in aiding decision makers to achieve to ideal BP according to challenges to achieve sustainability.
Keywords :
Blockchain; MCDM; SWARA; WSM; Neutrosophic Sets; Enterprise Banking System.
References :
[1] S. Zafar, Z. Alamgir, and M. H. Rehman, “An effective blockchain evaluation system based on entropy-CRITIC weight method and MCDM techniques,” Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 3110–3123, 2021.
[2] I. Erol, I. M. Ar, I. Peker, and C. Searcy, “Alleviating the impact of the barriers to circular economy adoption through blockchain: an investigation using an integrated MCDM-based QFD with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 165, p. 107962, 2022.
[3] Z. A. Siddiqui and M. Haroon, “Research on significant factors affecting adoption of blockchain technology for enterprise distributed applications based on integrated MCDM FCEM-MULTIMOORA-FG method,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 118, p. 105699, 2023.
[4] V. S. Yadav, A. R. Singh, R. D. Raut, and N. Cheikhrouhou, “Blockchain drivers to achieve sustainable food security in the Indian context,” Annals of Operations Research, pp. 1–39, 2021.
[5] W. Lu, L. Wu, and F. Xue, “Blockchain technology for projects: A multicriteria decision matrix,” Project Management Journal, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 84–99, 2022.
[6] C. Pu, “A novel blockchain-based trust management scheme for vehicular networks,” in 2021 wireless telecommunications symposium (WTS), 2021, pp. 1–6.
[7] S. Farshidi, S. Jansen, S. España, and J. Verkleij, “Decision support for blockchain platform selection: Three industry case studies,” IEEE transactions on Engineering management, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 1109–1128, 2020.
[8] A. Abdel-Monem, A. A. Gawad, and H. Rashad, Blockchain Risk Evaluation on Enterprise Systems using an Intelligent MCDM based model, vol. 38. Infinite Study, 2020.
[9] M. Kaska and A. C. Tolga, “Blockchain software selection for a maritime organization with MCDM method,” in Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques: Smart and Innovative Solutions: Proceedings of the INFUS 2020 Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, July 21-23, 2020, 2021, pp. 543–549.
[10] E. Filatovas, M. Marcozzi, L. Mostarda, and R. Paulavičius, “A MCDM-based framework for blockchain consensus protocol selection,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 204, p. 117609, 2022.
[11] I. Erol, A. Oztel, C. Searcy, and İ. T. Medeni, “Selecting the most suitable blockchain platform: A case study on the healthcare industry using a novel rough MCDM framework,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 186, p. 122132, 2023.
[12] H. Hassani, X. Huang, and E. Silva, “Banking with blockchain-ed big data,” Journal of Management Analytics, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 256–275, 2018.
[13] W. L. Harris and J. Wonglimpiyarat, “Blockchain platform and future bank competition,” Foresight, 2019.
[14] Q. K. Nguyen, “Blockchain-a financial technology for future sustainable development,” in 2016 3rd International conference on green technology and sustainable development (GTSD), 2016, pp. 51–54.
[15] M. Çolak, I. Kaya, B. Özkan, A. Budak, and A. Karaşan, “A multi-criteria evaluation model based on hesitant fuzzy sets for blockchain technology in supply chain management,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 935–946, 2020.
[16] B. Özkan, İ. Kaya, M. Erdoğan, and A. Karaşan, “Evaluating blockchain risks by using a MCDM methodology based on pythagorean fuzzy sets,” in Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques in Big Data Analytics and Decision Making: Proceedings of the INFUS 2019 Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, July 23-25, 2019, 2020, pp. 935–943.
[17] I. Peker, I. M. AR, I. Erol, and C. Searcy, “Leveraging blockchain in response to a pandemic through disaster risk management: an IF-MCDM framework,” Operations Management Research, pp. 1–26, 2022.
[18] L. Cocco, A. Pinna, and M. Marchesi, “Banking on blockchain: Costs savings thanks to the blockchain technology,” Future internet, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 25, 2017.
[19] Y. Guo and C. Liang, “Blockchain application and outlook in the banking industry,” Financial innovation, vol. 2, pp. 1–12, 2016.
[20] R. Wang, Z. Lin, and H. Luo, “Blockchain, bank credit and SME financing,” Quality & Quantity, vol. 53, pp. 1127–1140, 2019.
[21] N. A. Nabeeh, A. Abdel-Monem, and A. Abdelmouty, A hybrid approach of neutrosophic with multimoora in application of personnel selection. Infinite Study, 2019.
[22] R. K. Chakrabortty, M. Abdel-Basset, and A. M. Ali, “A multi-criteria decision analysis model for selecting an optimum customer service chatbot under uncertainty,” Decision Analytics Journal, p. 100168, 2023.
[23] N. A. Nabeeh et al., “A Neutrosophic Evaluation Model for Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management,” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), 2022, pp. 1–8.
[24] N. A. Nabeeh, A. Abdel-Monem, and A. Abdelmouty, “A novel methodology for assessment of hospital service according to BWM, MABAC, PROMETHEE II,” Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, vol. 31, pp. 63–79, 2020.
[25] A. Vafadarnikjoo, H. Badri Ahmadi, J. J. H. Liou, T. Botelho, and K. Chalvatzis, “Analyzing blockchain adoption barriers in manufacturing supply chains by the neutrosophic analytic hierarchy process,” Annals of Operations Research, pp. 1–28, 2021.
[26] U. Cali, M. Deveci, S. S. Saha, U. Halden, and F. Smarandache, “Prioritizing energy blockchain use cases using type-2 neutrosophic number-based EDAS,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 34260–34276, 2022.
[27] A. Aliahmadi and H. Nozari, “Evaluation of security metrics in AIoT and blockchain-based supply chain by Neutrosophic decision-making method,” in Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 2022, pp. 1–12.
[28] M. A. B. Promentilla and F. Kuok, “AT-Spherical Neutrosophic Fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP Approach to Problematiques of Blockchain Technology in Smart Cities,” in 2022 14th International Conference on Software, Knowledge, Information Management and Applications (SKIMA), 2022, pp. 145–150.
[29] A. E. Torkayesh, M. Deveci, S. E. Torkayesh, and E. B. Tirkolaee, “Analyzing failures in adoption of smart technologies for medical waste management systems: A type-2 neutrosophic-based approach,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, pp. 1–14, 2021.
[30] J.-S. Kim and N. Shin, “The impact of blockchain technology application on supply chain partnership and performance,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 21, p. 6181, 2019.
[31] A. Haleem, M. Javaid, R. P. Singh, R. Suman, and S. Rab, “Blockchain technology applications in healthcare: An overview,” International Journal of Intelligent Networks, vol. 2, pp. 130–139, 2021.
[32] M. Javaid, A. Haleem, R. P. Singh, S. Khan, and R. Suman, “Blockchain technology applications for Industry 4.0: A literature-based review,” Blockchain: Research and Applications, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 100027, 2021.
[33] O. Hutsaliuk, O. V Yaroshevska, N. M. Shmatko, I. V Kulko-Labyntseva, and A. Navolokina, “Stakeholder approach to selecting enterprise-bank interaction strategies,” 2020.
[34] A. Gupta and S. Gupta, “blockchain technology application in Indian banking sector,” Delhi Business Review, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 75–84, 2018.
[35] P. Garg, B. Gupta, A. K. Chauhan, U. Sivarajah, S. Gupta, and S. Modgil, “Measuring the perceived benefits of implementing blockchain technology in the banking sector,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 163, p. 120407, 2021.
[36] M. Abdel-Basset, M. Mohamed, A. Abdel-Monem, and M. A. Elfattah, “New extension of ordinal priority approach for multiple attribute decision-making problems: design and analysis,” Complex & Intelligent Systems, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 4955–4970, 2022.
[37] N. A. Nabeeh et al., “A Comparative Analysis for a Novel Hybrid Methodology using Neutrosophic theory with MCDM for Manufacture Selection,” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), 2022, pp. 1–8.
[38] A. Abdelhafeez, H. K. Mohamed, A. Maher, and A. Abdelmonem, “A Neutrosophic based C-Means Approach for Improving Breast Cancer Clustering Performance.”
[39] A. Abdel-Monem and A. A. Gawad, “A hybrid Model Using MCDM Methods and Bipolar Neutrosophic Sets for Select Optimal Wind Turbine: Case Study in Egypt,” Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, vol. 42, pp. 1–27, 2021.
[40] N. A. Nabeeh, M. Abdel-Basset, H. A. El-Ghareeb, and A. Aboelfetouh, “Neutrosophic multi-criteria decision making approach for iot-based enterprises,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 59559–59574, 2019.
[41] N. A. Nabeeh, F. Smarandache, M. Abdel-Basset, H. A. El-Ghareeb, and A. Aboelfetouh, “An integrated neutrosophic-topsis approach and its application to personnel selection: A new trend in brain processing and analysis,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 29734–29744, 2019.
[42] S. Vrtagić, E. Softić, M. Subotić, Ž. Stević, M. Dordevic, and M. Ponjavic, “Ranking road sections based on MCDM model: New improved fuzzy SWARA (IMF SWARA),” Axioms, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 92, 2021.
[43] S. H. Zolfani and J. Saparauskas, “New application of SWARA method in prioritizing sustainability assessment indicators of energy system,” Engineering Economics, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 408–414, 2013.
[44] S. H. Zolfani, E. K. Zavadskas, and Z. Turskis, “Design of products with both International and Local perspectives based on Yin-Yang balance theory and SWARA method,” Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 153–166, 2013.
[45] D. Radović and Ž. Stević, “Evaluation and selection of KPI in transport using SWARA method,” Transport & Logistics: The International Journal, vol. 8, no. 44, pp. 60–68, 2018.
[46] D. Handoko, M. Mesran, S. D. Nasution, Y. Yuhandri, and H. Nurdiyanto, “Application of Weight Sum Model (WSM) in determining special allocation funds recipients,” The IJICS (International Journal of Informatics and Computer Science), vol. 1, no. 2, 2017.
[47] Z. Chourabi, F. Khedher, A. Babay, and M. Cheikhrouhou, “Multi-criteria decision making in workforce choice using AHP, WSM and WPM,” The Journal of The Textile Institute, vol. 110, no. 7, pp. 1092–1101, 2019.
[48] A. Jadhav and R. Sonar, “Analytic hierarchy process (AHP), weighted scoring method (WSM), and hybrid knowledge based system (HKBS) for software selection: a comparative study,” in 2009 Second International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering & Technology, 2009, pp. 991–997.
[49] R. J. Bathurst, T. M. Allen, and D. L. Walters, “Reinforcement loads in geosynthetic walls and the case for a new working stress design method,” Geotextiles and Geomembranes, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 287–322, 2005.
[50] H.-C. Lee and C.-T. Chang, “Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for ranking renewable energy sources in Taiwan,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 92, pp. 883–896, 2018.
[51] M. Abdel-Basset, A. Gamal, N. Moustafa, A. Abdel-Monem, and N. El-Saber, “A Security-by-Design Decision-Making Model for Risk Management in Autonomous Vehicles,” IEEE Access, 2021.
| Style | # |
|---|---|
| MLA | Nada A. Nabeeh, Alshaimaa A. Tantawy. "A Neutrosophic Model for Blockchain Platform Selection based on SWARA and WSM." Neutrosophic and Information Fusion, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2023 ,PP. 29-43 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/NIF.010204) |
| APA | Nada A. Nabeeh, Alshaimaa A. Tantawy. (2023). A Neutrosophic Model for Blockchain Platform Selection based on SWARA and WSM. Journal of Neutrosophic and Information Fusion, 1 ( 2 ), 29-43 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/NIF.010204) |
| Chicago | Nada A. Nabeeh, Alshaimaa A. Tantawy. "A Neutrosophic Model for Blockchain Platform Selection based on SWARA and WSM." Journal of Neutrosophic and Information Fusion, 1 no. 2 (2023): 29-43 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/NIF.010204) |
| Harvard | Nada A. Nabeeh, Alshaimaa A. Tantawy. (2023). A Neutrosophic Model for Blockchain Platform Selection based on SWARA and WSM. Journal of Neutrosophic and Information Fusion, 1 ( 2 ), 29-43 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/NIF.010204) |
| Vancouver | Nada A. Nabeeh, Alshaimaa A. Tantawy. A Neutrosophic Model for Blockchain Platform Selection based on SWARA and WSM. Journal of Neutrosophic and Information Fusion, (2023); 1 ( 2 ): 29-43 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/NIF.010204) |
| IEEE | Nada A. Nabeeh, Alshaimaa A. Tantawy, A Neutrosophic Model for Blockchain Platform Selection based on SWARA and WSM, Journal of Neutrosophic and Information Fusion, Vol. 1 , No. 2 , (2023) : 29-43 (Doi : https://doi.org/10.54216/NIF.010204) |