Volume 1 , Issue 2 , PP: 08-15, 2023 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article
Ahmed Abdelhafeez 1 * , Hoda K Mohamed 2
Doi: https://doi.org/10.54216/NIF.010201
As a method of transportation, the bus rapid transit system (BRT), also known as BRT, has a greater occupancy rate and is better suited for travelling over longer distances. Evaluating the performance of potential alternatives is necessary because of concerns over sustainability and the need to improve BRT's performance to increase customer satisfaction. On the other hand, criteria that are predicated on the fundamental idea of the emission performance of BRT call for ambiguous or indeterminate expert evaluations to be addressed using single-valued neutrosophic sets (SVNSs). An integrated paradigm for making decisions based on several factors is shown here. To evaluate and rank the solutions, we used a measurement of the different options available and ranked them with the Neutrosophic MARCOS method.
Bus rapid transit system , MCDM , Neutrosophic Sets , MARCOS ,
[1] H. S. Levinson, S. Zimmerman, J. Clinger, and H. C. S. Rutherford, “Bus rapid transit: An overview,” Journal of Public Transportation, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–30, 2002.
[2] D. A. RODRÍGUEZ** and F. Targa, “Value of accessibility to Bogotá’s bus rapid transit system,” Transport Reviews, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 587–610, 2004.
[3] H. Levinson et al., “Bus rapid transit,” Transit Cooperative Research Program Report, vol. 90, 2003.
[4] D. A. Hensher and T. F. Golob, “Bus rapid transit systems: a comparative assessment,” Transportation, vol. 35, pp. 501–518, 2008.
[5] T. Deng and J. D. Nelson, “Recent developments in bus rapid transit: a review of the literature,” Transport Reviews, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 69–96, 2011.
[6] T. Satiennam, A. Fukuda, and R. Oshima, “A study on the introduction of bus rapid transit system in Asian developing cities: A case study on Bangkok Metropolitan Administration Project,” IATSS research, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 59–69, 2006.
[7] L. A. Lindau, D. Hidalgo, and D. Facchini, “Curitiba, the cradle of bus rapid transit,” Built Environment, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 274–282, 2010.
[8] L. A. Lindau, D. Hidalgo, and A. de Almeida Lobo, “Barriers to planning and implementing Bus Rapid Transit systems,” Research in Transportation Economics, vol. 48, pp. 9–15, 2014.
[9] M. Poku-Boansi and G. Marsden, “Bus rapid transit systems as a governance reform project,” Journal of transport geography, vol. 70, pp. 193–202, 2018.
[10] M. Leyva-Vazquez, J. Estupiñan, and F. Smarandache, “Neutrosophic in Latin America, advances and perspectives (Neutrosofía en Latinoamérica, advances y perspectivas),” Neutrosophic Computing and Machine Learning, vol. 14, p. 1, 2020.
[11] J. E. Ricardo, A. J. R. Fernández, T. T. C. Martínez, and W. A. C. Calle, “Analysis of Sustainable Development Indicators through Neutrosophic Correlation Coefficients,” 2022.
[12] H. Garrett, Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023.
[13] M. Abobala, “On the representation of neutrosophic matrices by neutrosophic linear transformations,” Journal of Mathematics, vol. 2021, pp. 1–5, 2021.
[14] E. O. Adeleke, A. A. A. Agboola, and F. Smarandache, Refined neutrosophic rings II. Infinite Study, 2020.
[15] M. B. Bouraima, N. A. Tengecha, Ž. Stević, V. Simić, and Y. Qiu, “An integrated fuzzy MCDM model for prioritizing strategies for successful implementation and operation of the bus rapid transit system,” Annals of Operations Research, pp. 1–32, 2023.
[16] R. K. Mavi, N. Zarbakhshnia, and A. Khazraei, “Bus rapid transit (BRT): A simulation and multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approach,” Transport Policy, vol. 72, pp. 187–197, 2018.
[17] M. Nassereddine and H. Eskandari, “An integrated MCDM approach to evaluate public transportation systems in Tehran,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 106, pp. 427–439, 2017.
[18] R. S. U. Haq et al., “Sustainable material selection with crisp and ambiguous data using a single-valued neutrosophic-MEREC-MARCOS framework,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 128, p. 109546, 2022.
[19] Y. Rong, W. Niu, H. Garg, Y. Liu, and L. Yu, “A hybrid group decision approach based on MARCOS and regret theory for pharmaceutical enterprises assessment under a single-valued neutrosophic scenario,” Systems, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 106, 2022.
[20] D. Pamucar, F. Ecer, and M. Deveci, “Assessment of alternative fuel vehicles for sustainable road transportation of United States using integrated fuzzy FUCOM and neutrosophic fuzzy MARCOS methodology,” Science of The Total Environment, vol. 788, p. 147763, 2021.
[21] E. Çakır, M. A. Taş, and Z. Ulukan, “Neutrosophic fuzzy MARCOS approach for sustainable hybrid electric vehicle assessment,” in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 2021, pp. 3423–3428.
[22] V. Simic, I. Gokasar, M. Deveci, and L. Švadlenka, “Mitigating Climate Change Effects of Urban Transportation Using a Type-2 Neutrosophic MEREC-MARCOS Model,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2022.
[23] L. Á. Cortés, M. R. H. Ruiz, and M. P. M. Rodrigo, Neutrosophic Multicriteria Method for Evaluating the Impact of Informal Trade on the “Mariscal de Puyo” Market, vol. 37. Infinite Study, 2020.
[24] R. G. Ortega, M. D. O. Rodríguez, M. L. Vázquez, J. E. Ricardo, J. A. S. Figueiredo, and F. Smarandache, Pestel analysis based on neutrosophic cognitive maps and neutrosophic numbers for the sinus river basin management. Infinite Study, 2019.