Volume 4 , Issue 2 , PP: 34-43, 2024 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article
Samandarboy Sulaymanov 1 *
Decision-makers at wastewater treatment plants must increase process efficiency and circularity while preserving economic performance. They must comply with increasing requirements about lowering emissions, sustainability, and human health safety. To operate and choose technologies to fulfil these expectations leads to complicated multi-objective issues. As a consequence, the water industry has developed several decision support systems. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) is used to deal with various criteria in the evaluation process. The MCDM methodology integrated with the probabilistic neutrosophic hesitant fuzzy set (PNHFS) to deal with vague and incomplete information. The PNHFS used the VIKOR method to rank the alternatives and used the optimal wastewater treatment plants. The criteria weights are computed. The results show that safety is of the highest importance—the sensitivity analysis was conducted to show the different ranks under different cases. The main results show the different ranks are stable, and the suggested MCDM methodology is robust compared with other MCDM methods.
Probabilistic Neutrosophic Hesitant Fuzzy Set , Waste Water Treatment , Multi-Criteria Decision Making ,
[1] G. L. Karia, R. A. Christian, and N. D. JARIWALA, Wastewater treatment: Concepts and design approach. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd., 2023.
[2] Z. Boger, “Application of neural networks to water and wastewater treatment plant operation,” ISA transactions, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 1992.
[3] K. V Gernaey, M. C. M. Van Loosdrecht, M. Henze, M. Lind, and S. B. Jørgensen, “Activated sludge wastewater treatment plant modelling and simulation: state of the art,” Environmental modelling & software, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 763–783, 2004.
[4] N. Schwarzenbeck, W. Pfeiffer, and E. Bomball, “Can a wastewater treatment plant be a powerplant? A case study,” Water science and technology, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 1555–1561, 2008.
[5] P. Vesilind, Wastewater treatment plant design, vol. 2. IWA publishing, 2003.
[6] S. R. Qasim, Wastewater treatment plants: planning, design, and operation. Routledge, 2017.
[7] I. Bodik and M. Kubaska, “Energy and sustainability of operation of a wastewater treatment plant,” Environment Protection Engineering, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 15–24, 2013.
[8] M. M. Hamed, M. G. Khalafallah, and E. A. Hassanien, “Prediction of wastewater treatment plant performance using artificial neural networks,” Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 919–928, 2004.
[9] A. Demirbas, G. Edris, and W. M. Alalayah, “Sludge production from municipal wastewater treatment in sewage treatment plant,” Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 999–1006, 2017.
[10] K. Kumar, P. Kumar, and M. Babu, “Performance evaluation of waste water treatment plant,” International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 7785–7796, 2010.
[11] P. A. Vanrolleghem, U. Jeppsson, J. Carstensen, B. Carlssont, and G. Olsson, “Integration of wastewater treatment plant design and operation—a systematic approach using cost functions,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 34, no. 3–4, pp. 159–171, 1996.
[12] R. O. Carey and K. W. Migliaccio, “Contribution of wastewater treatment plant effluents to nutrient dynamics in aquatic systems: a review,” Environmental management, vol. 44, pp. 205–217, 2009.
[13] S. Gillot, B. De Clercq, D. Defour, F. Simoens, K. Gernaey, and P. A. Vanrolleghem, “Optimization of wastewater treatment plant design and operation using simulation and cost analysis,” in Proceedings of 72nd Annual WEF Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, USA, 1999, pp. 9–13.
[14] L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, 1965.
[15] U. Rivieccio, “Neutrosophic logics: Prospects and problems,” Fuzzy sets and systems, vol. 159, no. 14, pp. 1860–1868, 2008.
[16] F. Smarandache, Introduction to neutrosophic measure, neutrosophic integral, and neutrosophic probability. Infinite Study, 2013.
[17] I. M. Hanafy, A. A. Salama, and K. Mahfouz, “Correlation of neutrosophic Data,” International Refereed Journal of Engineering and Science (IRJES), vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 39–43, 2012.
[18] K. M. Sallam and A. W. Mohamed, “Single Valued Neutrosophic Sets for Assessment Quality of Suppliers under Uncertainty Environment,” Multicriteria Algorithms with Applications, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2023.
[19] P. A. Rodrigo and S. Maheswari, “Neutrosophic gsα*-Open and Closed Maps in Neutrosophic Topological Spaces,” Neutrosophic Systems with Applications, vol. 8, pp. 42–49, 2023.
[20] F. Smarandache, Introduction to neutrosophic statistics. Infinite Study, 2014.
[21] F. Smarandache and S. Pramanik, New trends in neutrosophic theory and applications, vol. 1. Infinite Study, 2016.
[22] N. El-Hefenawy, M. A. Metwally, Z. M. Ahmed, and I. M. El-Henawy, “A review on the applications of neutrosophic sets,” Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 936–944, 2016.
[23] G. Kaur and H. Garg, “A novel algorithm for autonomous parking vehicles using adjustable probabilistic neutrosophic hesitant fuzzy set features,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 226, p. 120101, 2023.
[24] M. Abdel-Basset, Y. Zhou, M. Mohamed, and V. Chang, “A group decision making framework based on neutrosophic VIKOR approach for e-government website evaluation,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 4213–4224, 2018.
[25] M. Abdel-Baset, V. Chang, A. Gamal, and F. Smarandache, “An integrated neutrosophic ANP and VIKOR method for achieving sustainable supplier selection: A case study in importing field,” Computers in Industry, vol. 106, pp. 94–110, 2019.
