2690-6791ISSN (Online)
2769-786XISSN (Print)
Volume 7 , Issue 2 , PP: 22-29, 2022 | Cite this article as | XML | Html | PDF | Full Length Article
Ahmed Abdelaziz 1 * , Alia Nabil Mahmoud 2
Doi: https://doi.org/10.54216/JISIoT.070202
The fast advancement of technology has contributed to a rise in everyone's demand to be connected to the internet. The Internet of Things is a notion that emerged with the fourth industrial revolution as a result of the finding that things that were born of the Internet can connect without the need for external causes (IoT). The communication of items with one another ensures that firms will spend as little time and money as possible on labor. Businesses that want to make the switch to the Internet of Things are going to run across a lot of challenges. The process of identifying and fixing these issues may result in both time and financial waste. Within the scope of this research, we looked at the challenges that are associated with the IoT. As a consequence of the research, the level of relevance of the elements that are generating these challenges was figured out using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) procedures, and the findings were given to the businesses. We decided on the primary criteria, as well as the secondary criteria that are connected to these primary criteria. The communication of different objects with one another is the primary goal of businesses that are making the shift to Industry 4.0. The purpose of this research was to identify the factors that contributed to the challenges encountered throughout the evolution to Industry 4.0. In the next step of the MCDM process, the DEMATEL approach was used to evaluate the level of significance associated with each of the factors. As a result of the research, we were able to establish which factors should be regarded as important for businesses that are interested in making the shift to the IoT. In this approach, businesses will be able to speed up the transition while limiting the amount of time and money lost in the process.
Decision Making , IoT , MCDM , DEMATEL , Internet of Things
[1] S. C. Rajkumar and L. J. Deborah, “Survey: Handling on difficulties in internet of things (iot) applications and its challenges,” in 2017 Second International Conference on Recent Trends and Challenges in Computational Models (ICRTCCM), 2017, pp. 37–42.
[2] B. Uslu, T. Eren, Ş. Gür, and E. Özcan, “Evaluation of the difficulties in the internet of things (IoT) with multi-criteria decision-making,” Processes, vol. 7, no. 3, p. 164, 2019.
[3] M. Abdel-Basset, N. A. Nabeeh, H. A. El-Ghareeb, and A. Aboelfetouh, “Utilising neutrosophic theory to solve transition difficulties of IoT-based enterprises,” Enterprise Information Systems, vol. 14, no. 9–10, pp. 1304–1324, 2020.
[4] N. Uchihira, H. Ishimatsu, and K. Inoue, “IoT service business ecosystem design in a global, competitive, and collaborative environment,” in 2016 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), 2016, pp. 1195–1201.
[5] R. G. Babu, P. Karthika, and V. A. Rajan, “Secure IoT systems using raspberry Pi machine learning artificial intelligence,” in International conference on computer networks and inventive communication technologies, 2020, pp. 797–805.
[6] J. Guth et al., “A detailed analysis of IoT platform architectures: concepts, similarities, and differences,” in Internet of everything, Springer, 2018, pp. 81–101.
[7] A. Shukla, “A study on Internet of things: Industrial application and difficulties,” EasyChair, 2021.
[8] I. Brass, L. Tanczer, M. Carr, M. Elsden, and J. Blackstock, “Standardising a moving target: The development and evolution of IoT security standards,” 2018.
[9] K. G. Chaudhari, “Review on Challenges and Advanced Research Areas in Internet of Things,” International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 3570–3574, 2019.
[10] S. Li, “Application of blockchain technology in smart city infrastructure,” in 2018 IEEE international conference on smart internet of things (SmartIoT), 2018, pp. 276–2766.
[11] J. L. Schaefer, J. C. M. Siluk, and P. S. de Carvalho, “An MCDM-based approach to evaluate the performance objectives for strategic management and development of Energy Cloud,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 320, p. 128853, 2021.
[12] S. Qahtan et al., “Novel multi security and privacy benchmarking framework for blockchain-based IoT healthcare industry 4.0 systems,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 6415–6423, 2022.
[13] M. Abdel-Basset, G. Manogaran, A. Gamal, and V. Chang, “A novel intelligent medical decision support model based on soft computing and IoT,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 4160–4170, 2019.
[14] S. M. U. Islam, S. Khan, H. Ahmad, M. A. U. Rahman, S. Tomar, and M. Z. Khan, “Assessment of challenges and problems in supply chain among retailers during COVID-19 epidemic through AHP-TOPSIS hybrid MCDM technique,” Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, vol. 2, pp. 180–193, 2022.
[15] M. Grida, R. Mohamed, and A. N. H. Zaied, A novel plithogenic MCDM framework for evaluating the performance of IoT based supply chain. Infinite Study, 2021.
[16] Y.-S. Kao, K. Nawata, and C.-Y. Huang, “Evaluating the performance of systemic innovation problems of the IoT in manufacturing industries by novel MCDM methods,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 18, p. 4970, 2019.
[17] B. B. Gardas, A. Heidari, N. J. Navimipour, and M. Unal, “A fuzzy-based method for objects selection in blockchain-enabled edge-IoT platforms using a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model,” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 17, p. 8906, 2022.
[18] V. Kumar, P. Vrat, and R. Shankar, “Prioritization of strategies to overcome the barriers in Industry 4.0: a hybrid MCDM approach,” Opsearch, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 711–750, 2021.
[19] M. Repetto, D. La Torre, and M. Tariq, “Goal Programming in Federated Learning: an Application to Time Series Forecasting,” in 2022 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA), 2022, pp. 1672–1677.
[20] C.-L. Lin, J. K. C. Chen, and H.-H. Ho, “BIM for smart hospital management during COVID-19 Using MCDM,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 11, p. 6181, 2021.
[21] W. Zhang and Y. Deng, “Combining conflicting evidence using the DEMATEL method,” Soft computing, vol. 23, no. 17, pp. 8207–8216, 2019.
[22] K.-H. Chang and C.-H. Cheng, “Evaluating the risk of failure using the fuzzy OWA and DEMATEL method,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 113–129, 2011.
[23] M. Sharma, S. Joshi, and A. Kumar, “Assessing enablers of e-waste management in circular economy using DEMATEL method: An Indian perspective,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 13325–13338, 2020.
[24] Y. Han and Y. Deng, “An enhanced fuzzy evidential DEMATEL method with its application to identify critical success factors,” Soft computing, vol. 22, no. 15, pp. 5073–5090, 2018.
[25] G.-H. Tzeng, W.-H. Chen, R. Yu, and M.-L. Shih, “Fuzzy decision maps: a generalization of the DEMATEL methods,” Soft Computing, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1141–1150, 2010.
[26] M. Abdel-Basset, G. Manogaran, A. Gamal, and F. Smarandache, “A hybrid approach of neutrosophic sets and DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria,” Design Automation for Embedded Systems, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 257–278, 2018.
