Active Agent Capacity and Liquidity Discipline in Mobile Money
Operations: A Business Analytics Perspective
Heba Moselhy1,* Dina K. Hassan2
1 Business Administration Department, Delta Higher Institute for Management and Accounting Information Systems, Egypt
2 Faculty of Commerce, Kafr El Sheikh University, Egypt
Emails: hebamoselhy5299@std.mans.edu.eg · dina.abdelsalam@com.kfs.edu.eg
Received: January 03, 2024 Revised: March 03, 2024 Accepted: June 24, 2024 ⋆ Corresponding author
ABSTRACT
Mobile money has evolved into a business-critical financial technology infrastructure, yet its operating strength
cannot be judged from customer scale alone. A platform may report rapid growth in registered accounts, transaction
value, or agent coverage while still facing service fragility when active agents do not expand at the same pace as
transaction demand. This study develops a business analytics model for evaluating active agent capacity, customer
activation, transaction intensity, and liquidity pressure as connected dimensions of mobile money operations. The
empirical analysis uses public aggregate indicators from mobile money industry reporting and demand-side financial
inclusion indicators from the Global Findex database. The model distinguishes between three managerial questions
that are often combined in practice: whether customers are becoming active users, whether agents are becoming
productive service points, and whether transaction value places increasing pressure on the active agent base. The
results show that transaction value and transaction volume grow more rapidly than customer scale, while registered
agent expansion exceeds active agent growth. Scenario analysis indicates that agent reactivation can reduce liquidity
pressure, whereas customer activation without corresponding service-capacity expansion increases operational
stress. The study contributes a practical measurement lens for FinTech managers, payment providers, investors, and
regulators seeking to scale mobile money while maintaining reliable last-mile service capacity.
Keywords: Financial technology Mobile money Agent liquidity Digital payments Business analytics
1. INTRODUCTION
Mobile money has become one of the most important operating
infrastructures in inclusive financial technology. It
supports peer-to-peer transfers, cash-in and cash-out, bill payment,
merchant acceptance, salary disbursement, remittances,
savings links, and digital credit interfaces. As the industry matures,
the strategic question changes from whether accounts
can be opened at scale to whether a provider can sustain reliable
service when more customers transact more frequently
and at higher values.
The agent network is central to this question. Agents convert
cash into electronic value, support account use, provide customer
assistance, and give mobile money a physical presence
in places where formal bank branches are limited. However,
the size of the registered agent base can be misleading. A
provider may have wide nominal coverage but weak service
capacity when a large share of agents are dormant, undercapitalized,
or unable to rebalance liquidity. In cash-dependent
markets, this distinction can directly affect customer trust and
transaction completion.
This study treats active agent capacity as a strategic constraint
in mobile money scaling. The approach differs from
adoption-focused FinTech analysis that emphasizes account