aspg-39-4348-1792222259 20261017073059 American Scientific Publishing Group admin@americaspg.com American Scientific Publishing Group Neutrosophic and Information Fusion NIF 2836-7863 2026 6 1 Arwa Hajjari Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt Decision environments that combine laboratory indicators, expert warnings, chemical descriptors, and regulatory traces rarely produce a single consistent description of risk. Classical aggregation rules usually collapse incomplete, contradictory, and partially reliable evidence into one scalar before the contradiction itself has been modelled. This paper develops an indeterminacy-balanced neutrosophic granulation method for prioritization problems in which truth, falsity, and hesitation must remain simultaneously visible during fusion. Each alternative is represented by a single-valued neutrosophic profile, criterion weights are obtained from a contrast-sensitive entropy functional, and the final ranking is produced by an indeterminacy-penalized evidence score. The mathematical contribution is a bounded fusion operator that separates positive support, negative pressure, and contradiction-induced hesitation. A numerical study reports detailed intermediate matrices, criterion weights, fused memberships, ranking stability, sensitivity to the indeterminacy penalty, ablation results, and computational complexity. The findings show that retaining indeterminacy during fusion changes the ordering of borderline alternatives and makes the decision trace easier to audit than scalar aggregation alone. 2026 09 15 4348 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 10.54216/NIF.060102 https://americaspg.com/journal/39/article/4348 https://americaspg.com/storage/articles/manuscripts/01KYGJBWTQSQSRGNC15BZEJZYN.pdf