aspg-1-2239-1792176559 20261016184919 American Scientific Publishing Group admin@americaspg.com American Scientific Publishing Group American Journal of Business and Operations Research AJBOR 2770-0216 2692-2967 2020 1 2 Muzafer Saracevic Department of Computer Sciences, University of Novi Pazar, Serbia Nan Wang Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun 130117, China Elma Elfic Zukorlic International University of Novi Pazar, Novi Pazar, Serbia Suad Becirovic International University of Novi Pazar, Novi Pazar, Serbia To evaluate and promote ecologically responsible practices in the sintering business, conducting a sustainability evaluation of sintering flue gas is essential. An important step in making iron and steel, sintering releases flue gas emissions that, if not controlled, may harm the environment. Reducing emissions, improving energy efficiency, managing waste, using water, utilizing resources, monitoring community effects, complying with regulations, conducting a life cycle assessment, and continuously improving are all part of the assessment's extensive scope. When these aspects are considered, stakeholders may better understand the economic, social, and environmental effects of sintering flue gas management. This paper used the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodology to evaluate the criteria. We used the DEMATEL method as an MCDM method. The DEMATEL is used to build the relation between the criteria. We collect ten criteria in this study. We compute the criteria weights to show this study’s best and worst criterion. The DEMATEL method is used to draw the effect diagram between criteria. 2020 84 92 2239 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 10.54216/AJBOR.010204 https://americaspg.com/journal/1/article/2239 https://americaspg.com/storage/81700242805.pdf